
The bar association was shocked that an investigation was ‘tainted’ because documents were stolen from Democrats’ computer servers and turned over to Kavanaugh and ‘Kavanaugh wasn’t concerned’?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/02/us/politics/kavanaugh-bar-association-aba.html In a transcript of the conference call, Ms. Tucker raised concerns about documents concerning judicial nominations stolen from the computer servers of Democratic lawmakers and passed along to Mr. Kavanaugh when he worked in the White House Counsel’s Office. He has said he did not know the documents had been stolen. Ms. Tucker said she was surprised by Mr. Kavanaugh’s attitude when she asked him about the matter. “He did not express any concern that the process had been compromised or that there was the need for a White House investigation,” she said. “We were concerned about his lack of interest in that particular matter, considering we felt that the process for which he was responsible had been tainted.” |
I’m sure you have at least one who isn’t a belligerent, unbalanced hack. Right? Maybe not. Must be tough to recruit and retain in the GOP. |
+1 |
If he hadn't lied with a blanket denial when the Ford allegation first surfaced, he would have been sworn in already. He made a grave tactical error and he dug his hole deeper with further lies and obfuscation. It really is his own fault for his own behavior, both in 1982 and 2018. |
You can keep rehashing this, but it doesn't change the facts on the ground today. Kavanaugh lied repeatedly on Fox and before the senate. His behavior did not display judicial temperment and only a small percentage of the American public support his nomination. |
Will the expose about Trump tax evasions strategies put DT over the edge today? |
Exactly. There were a few different ways he could have handled it. “Belligerent BS” was not the best approach. |
Was that an act for DT not to withdraw his nomination? |
Because she understood that the yearbook comment was stupid, idiotic teenage boy behavior that, in the 1980s, was commonplace. She saw it in 1983(?) and has had 35 years to recover. Since they were good friends, it stands to reason that the people involved talked about it at the time. May have even been in on the "joke" and thought it was stupid but okay, as we women often were at that time. |
Doubt it. We all know he’s a fraud and a crook. Now if someone can actually prosecute him, that’s a different story. But the investigation didn’t reveal anything we didn’t already know about him. |
True. But will eat at him to have it all laid out so clearly with so much evidence in the "failing" NYT? |
Trump doesn’t care what BK does or says. He just wants him in that seat. For protection. As a notch in his belt. He will do it at any cost. |
Hope the price is too high for some of those key senators. |
Bill Clinton’s grossness was a different time - back then people thought that men could behave badly, but as long as they were taking care of the people we gave them a pass. The press used to not even report on Presidents’ bad behavior way back when and that obviously changed (more for corruption, less for infidelity). Times have changed and we now expect better. It does not seem reasonable at all for people to still be rd ting about ‘Bill Clinton ‘ did this or that when plenty of voting citizens today were still in diapers then. Of course I don’t understand how the lying under oath passed muster? I still find that shocking, despite the fact that Trump lies every day and apparently has apparently evaded paying his taxes for years. But I digress. |
Dude lives in la-la land. And has zero sense of self-reflection and loads of denial. It will be someone else’s fault if he even comprehends what happened. |