Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it just one really unhinged, hateful poster here? The level of visceral rage this poster has for MM is remarkable, to say the least. It’s almost like she personally knows MM and has a vendetta against her. I’ve never really seen anything quite like this, especially considering MM is fairly inoffensive.

The post was deleted but I was called barren for defending her. Someone (or more than one) here is really flipping out about her.

It’s because of what is in website feedback.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The truth is that nobody gives damn if you or anyone else has a miscarriage.l

That’s the problem.

People should care. It’s a hard loss to take for most people.

Yes, there are some people who say they didn’t feel any sadnesss, but that’s a low percentage. Most people feel sadness. Some feel that sadness even decades later after having subsequent successful pregnancies.

Are these the same navel-gazers who still feel sadness that they had to wear a peach prom dress when they wanted pink?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel for Harry, but I am sure we will be hearing of the divorce soon.

My own mother died young, and it definitely influenced my partner choices and relationships, and those of my brothers. Somehow that essential relationship being cut short in a sudden, traumatic way caused all of us to try to replay different aspects of how we related to our mother, revisiting things we regretted in our relationship with her as we forged new relationships; it took a long time before a therapist pointed this out to me. But I see Harry doing the same thing.

I think Meghan is quite good at presenting the 'woe is me' act, and this type of person is often quite good at sparking sympathy and protective feelings in others, at least initially. Harry wanted to protect her in a way he couldn't protect his mother. But the Meghan types become exhausting and difficult (note her string of broken relationships), and it is unfortunate Harry didn't heed his brother's advice and wait before plunging into an early marriage.

You are a vile, misogynistic hypocrite. Harry had many many many broken relationships before Meghan. And his earned accomplishments prior to marriage were minimal compared to Meghan’s. If he weren’t a lucky sperm born in the royal family, Meghan would have been the catch by far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel for Harry, but I am sure we will be hearing of the divorce soon.

My own mother died young, and it definitely influenced my partner choices and relationships, and those of my brothers. Somehow that essential relationship being cut short in a sudden, traumatic way caused all of us to try to replay different aspects of how we related to our mother, revisiting things we regretted in our relationship with her as we forged new relationships; it took a long time before a therapist pointed this out to me. But I see Harry doing the same thing.

I think Meghan is quite good at presenting the 'woe is me' act, and this type of person is often quite good at sparking sympathy and protective feelings in others, at least initially. Harry wanted to protect her in a way he couldn't protect his mother. But the Meghan types become exhausting and difficult (note her string of broken relationships), and it is unfortunate Harry didn't heed his brother's advice and wait before plunging into an early marriage.

You are a vile, misogynistic hypocrite. Harry had many many many broken relationships before Meghan. And his earned accomplishments prior to marriage were minimal compared to Meghan’s. If he weren’t a lucky sperm born in the royal family, Meghan would have been the catch by far.

So let me get this straight: I am a misogynist because I happen to identify with another human being who lost his mother in circumstances not unlike those in which I lost my own mother, and this person happens to be male? Plus, I dislike this person's spouse, who happens to be female? Oh, OK then.

I don't know where the 'hypocrite' thing comes in here. My mum died young, and so did Harry's. Harry and I are the same age. I have always followed his misadventures (from the UK, where I lived) and identified with his blunders because they remind me of my own or my brother's, and I do think that losing a mother early and suddenly contributes to a lot of upheaval in a person's teen/young adult years. I sympathise with him and I don't think a person who hasn't lost a mother young can fully understand why.

And no, I don't think one can compare Harry's early romantic misadventures with Meghan's broken relationships with family and friends. It isn't the same thing at all.

As for her 'accomplishments', I don't think she is a very good actor, and her charitable efforts have been showy and crassly me-me-me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel for Harry, but I am sure we will be hearing of the divorce soon.

My own mother died young, and it definitely influenced my partner choices and relationships, and those of my brothers. Somehow that essential relationship being cut short in a sudden, traumatic way caused all of us to try to replay different aspects of how we related to our mother, revisiting things we regretted in our relationship with her as we forged new relationships; it took a long time before a therapist pointed this out to me. But I see Harry doing the same thing.

I think Meghan is quite good at presenting the 'woe is me' act, and this type of person is often quite good at sparking sympathy and protective feelings in others, at least initially. Harry wanted to protect her in a way he couldn't protect his mother. But the Meghan types become exhausting and difficult (note her string of broken relationships), and it is unfortunate Harry didn't heed his brother's advice and wait before plunging into an early marriage.

You are a vile, misogynistic hypocrite. Harry had many many many broken relationships before Meghan. And his earned accomplishments prior to marriage were minimal compared to Meghan’s. If he weren’t a lucky sperm born in the royal family, Meghan would have been the catch by far.

What is “a lucky sperm?” A sperm whale?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it just one really unhinged, hateful poster here? The level of visceral rage this poster has for MM is remarkable, to say the least. It’s almost like she personally knows MM and has a vendetta against her. I’ve never really seen anything quite like this, especially considering MM is fairly inoffensive.

The post was deleted but I was called barren for defending her. Someone (or more than one) here is really flipping out about her.

And that poster emerges at 07:45 (see post)...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel for Harry, but I am sure we will be hearing of the divorce soon.

My own mother died young, and it definitely influenced my partner choices and relationships, and those of my brothers. Somehow that essential relationship being cut short in a sudden, traumatic way caused all of us to try to replay different aspects of how we related to our mother, revisiting things we regretted in our relationship with her as we forged new relationships; it took a long time before a therapist pointed this out to me. But I see Harry doing the same thing.

I think Meghan is quite good at presenting the 'woe is me' act, and this type of person is often quite good at sparking sympathy and protective feelings in others, at least initially. Harry wanted to protect her in a way he couldn't protect his mother. But the Meghan types become exhausting and difficult (note her string of broken relationships), and it is unfortunate Harry didn't heed his brother's advice and wait before plunging into an early marriage.

You are a vile, misogynistic hypocrite. Harry had many many many broken relationships before Meghan. And his earned accomplishments prior to marriage were minimal compared to Meghan’s. If he weren’t a lucky sperm born in the royal family, Meghan would have been the catch by far.

So let me get this straight: I am a misogynist because I happen to identify with another human being who lost his mother in circumstances not unlike those in which I lost my own mother, and this person happens to be male? Plus, I dislike this person's spouse, who happens to be female? Oh, OK then.

I don't know where the 'hypocrite' thing comes in here. My mum died young, and so did Harry's. Harry and I are the same age. I have always followed his misadventures (from the UK, where I lived) and identified with his blunders because they remind me of my own or my brother's, and I do think that losing a mother early and suddenly contributes to a lot of upheaval in a person's teen/young adult years. I sympathise with him and I don't think a person who hasn't lost a mother young can fully understand why.

And no, I don't think one can compare Harry's early romantic misadventures with Meghan's broken relationships with family and friends. It isn't the same thing at all.

As for her 'accomplishments', I don't think she is a very good actor, and her charitable efforts have been showy and crassly me-me-me.

I would normally report this to Jeff for being so self-indulgently OFF Topic but I don't want to ruin his Sunday morning.

This is a Megan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates thread people, not a confessional box for your family histories.

[Anonymous]

I mean Meghan clearly wants people to connect their own lives to hers, so mentioning the connection to family history should be okay. It is fully in context. I can't imagine Harry would be upset at someone sympathizing over shared orphanhood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel for Harry, but I am sure we will be hearing of the divorce soon.

My own mother died young, and it definitely influenced my partner choices and relationships, and those of my brothers. Somehow that essential relationship being cut short in a sudden, traumatic way caused all of us to try to replay different aspects of how we related to our mother, revisiting things we regretted in our relationship with her as we forged new relationships; it took a long time before a therapist pointed this out to me. But I see Harry doing the same thing.

I think Meghan is quite good at presenting the 'woe is me' act, and this type of person is often quite good at sparking sympathy and protective feelings in others, at least initially. Harry wanted to protect her in a way he couldn't protect his mother. But the Meghan types become exhausting and difficult (note her string of broken relationships), and it is unfortunate Harry didn't heed his brother's advice and wait before plunging into an early marriage.

You are a vile, misogynistic hypocrite. Harry had many many many broken relationships before Meghan. And his earned accomplishments prior to marriage were minimal compared to Meghan’s. If he weren’t a lucky sperm born in the royal family, Meghan would have been the catch by far.

So let me get this straight: I am a misogynist because I happen to identify with another human being who lost his mother in circumstances not unlike those in which I lost my own mother, and this person happens to be male? Plus, I dislike this person's spouse, who happens to be female? Oh, OK then.

I don't know where the 'hypocrite' thing comes in here. My mum died young, and so did Harry's. Harry and I are the same age. I have always followed his misadventures (from the UK, where I lived) and identified with his blunders because they remind me of my own or my brother's, and I do think that losing a mother early and suddenly contributes to a lot of upheaval in a person's teen/young adult years. I sympathise with him and I don't think a person who hasn't lost a mother young can fully understand why.

And no, I don't think one can compare Harry's early romantic misadventures with Meghan's broken relationships with family and friends. It isn't the same thing at all.

As for her 'accomplishments', I don't think she is a very good actor, and her charitable efforts have been showy and crassly me-me-me.

I would normally report this to Jeff for being so self-indulgently OFF Topic but I don't want to ruin his Sunday morning.

This is a Megan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates thread people, not a confessional box for your family histories.

DP. This is nutty. This thread isn't only for updates. It's for discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Usually a miscarriage has to do with fetal problems.
As hard as it is to lose an unviable fetus, it would be a lifetime of hardship to bring a compromised one into the world.
As well would saddle a sibling with a responsibility that the sibling never asked for.
I've never really understood the self-pity of women who have had miscarriages.
It's fairly common. There is a reason why most people wait until after 12 weeks to inform their families - because after 12 weeks the fetus is usually viable.

I can understand the tragedy of loss in 3rd trimester as that is likely a healthy child with healthy development but for some unfortunate twist of the umbilical cord or other.

I couldn't imagine nor live with the thought of imposing on my kids a lifetime of caring for a disabled brother/sister after their parents pass.

What Markle is actually lamenting is her advanced maternal age and her waning fecundity.

No what Megan is lamenting is her waning public stature, which is all she cares about.

I'm sure she's terribly sad about having had a miscarriage, just like anyone else who's ever experienced it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel for Harry, but I am sure we will be hearing of the divorce soon.

My own mother died young, and it definitely influenced my partner choices and relationships, and those of my brothers. Somehow that essential relationship being cut short in a sudden, traumatic way caused all of us to try to replay different aspects of how we related to our mother, revisiting things we regretted in our relationship with her as we forged new relationships; it took a long time before a therapist pointed this out to me. But I see Harry doing the same thing.

I think Meghan is quite good at presenting the 'woe is me' act, and this type of person is often quite good at sparking sympathy and protective feelings in others, at least initially. Harry wanted to protect her in a way he couldn't protect his mother. But the Meghan types become exhausting and difficult (note her string of broken relationships), and it is unfortunate Harry didn't heed his brother's advice and wait before plunging into an early marriage.

You are a vile, misogynistic hypocrite. Harry had many many many broken relationships before Meghan. And his earned accomplishments prior to marriage were minimal compared to Meghan’s. If he weren’t a lucky sperm born in the royal family, Meghan would have been the catch by far.

So let me get this straight: I am a misogynist because I happen to identify with another human being who lost his mother in circumstances not unlike those in which I lost my own mother, and this person happens to be male? Plus, I dislike this person's spouse, who happens to be female? Oh, OK then.

I don't know where the 'hypocrite' thing comes in here. My mum died young, and so did Harry's. Harry and I are the same age. I have always followed his misadventures (from the UK, where I lived) and identified with his blunders because they remind me of my own or my brother's, and I do think that losing a mother early and suddenly contributes to a lot of upheaval in a person's teen/young adult years. I sympathise with him and I don't think a person who hasn't lost a mother young can fully understand why.

And no, I don't think one can compare Harry's early romantic misadventures with Meghan's broken relationships with family and friends. It isn't the same thing at all.

As for her 'accomplishments', I don't think she is a very good actor, and her charitable efforts have been showy and crassly me-me-me.

Everything she does is seen as "me-me-me" by her detractors. Even having a miscarriage was described upthread as a PR stunt. I'm sure the charities are happy to have her work, her money and her attention, no matter what her motives may be. I wish I were in a position to make a difference to a charity just by showing up. I would love that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My God, with the exception of the title of King, Harry has basically repeated history of his grandmother’s uncle. Fleeing to America with a divorcee and having to beg for an allowance. The hate and disdain for his fleeing just like it was back then. Ironically, the present Queen was the one to show a minimal bit of empathy for her Uncle that left to be an American playboy on the arm of his American actress who had carry nicknames for all the members of the Royal family. It’s uncanny. It’s like the followed the playbook.

Huge difference. The spares always are left to beg for money and places to live for themselves and their kids. Look at Charles siblings. Or how hard Andrew had to beg for a wedding for Beatrice. AND Charles has been very clear that he is planning to streamline the monarchy to direct heirs.

Harry is a much better person than his great uncle but honestly gave up much less for love.

Yes, I say good for Harry for leaving and making his own path. He has a beautiful wife, a beautiful son and lots of money. Let the haters hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel for Harry, but I am sure we will be hearing of the divorce soon.

My own mother died young, and it definitely influenced my partner choices and relationships, and those of my brothers. Somehow that essential relationship being cut short in a sudden, traumatic way caused all of us to try to replay different aspects of how we related to our mother, revisiting things we regretted in our relationship with her as we forged new relationships; it took a long time before a therapist pointed this out to me. But I see Harry doing the same thing.

I think Meghan is quite good at presenting the 'woe is me' act, and this type of person is often quite good at sparking sympathy and protective feelings in others, at least initially. Harry wanted to protect her in a way he couldn't protect his mother. But the Meghan types become exhausting and difficult (note her string of broken relationships), and it is unfortunate Harry didn't heed his brother's advice and wait before plunging into an early marriage.

You are a vile, misogynistic hypocrite. Harry had many many many broken relationships before Meghan. And his earned accomplishments prior to marriage were minimal compared to Meghan’s. If he weren’t a lucky sperm born in the royal family, Meghan would have been the catch by far.

So let me get this straight: I am a misogynist because I happen to identify with another human being who lost his mother in circumstances not unlike those in which I lost my own mother, and this person happens to be male? Plus, I dislike this person's spouse, who happens to be female? Oh, OK then.

I don't know where the 'hypocrite' thing comes in here. My mum died young, and so did Harry's. Harry and I are the same age. I have always followed his misadventures (from the UK, where I lived) and identified with his blunders because they remind me of my own or my brother's, and I do think that losing a mother early and suddenly contributes to a lot of upheaval in a person's teen/young adult years. I sympathise with him and I don't think a person who hasn't lost a mother young can fully understand why.

And no, I don't think one can compare Harry's early romantic misadventures with Meghan's broken relationships with family and friends. It isn't the same thing at all.

As for her 'accomplishments', I don't think she is a very good actor, and her charitable efforts have been showy and crassly me-me-me.

Hm, you seem to think this thread is about you. It's not. And even when speaking about you, you, and more you, you speak of no accomplishments of your own while disparaging another person's accomplishments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My God, with the exception of the title of King, Harry has basically repeated history of his grandmother’s uncle. Fleeing to America with a divorcee and having to beg for an allowance. The hate and disdain for his fleeing just like it was back then. Ironically, the present Queen was the one to show a minimal bit of empathy for her Uncle that left to be an American playboy on the arm of his American actress who had carry nicknames for all the members of the Royal family. It’s uncanny. It’s like the followed the playbook.

Huge difference. The spares always are left to beg for money and places to live for themselves and their kids. Look at Charles siblings. Or how hard Andrew had to beg for a wedding for Beatrice. AND Charles has been very clear that he is planning to streamline the monarchy to direct heirs.

Harry is a much better person than his great uncle but honestly gave up much less for love.

Yes, I say good for Harry for leaving and making his own path. He has a beautiful wife, a beautiful son and lots of money. Let the haters hate.

Exactly. How many of these anti-H&M posters would want to turn forty still living at the financial mercy of a parent or older sibling? We tell our children everyday, forge your path and yet these posters are upset that a grown ass man finally did. So what if it took the help of a strong woman to give him the courage, at least he finally took the plunge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My God, with the exception of the title of King, Harry has basically repeated history of his grandmother’s uncle. Fleeing to America with a divorcee and having to beg for an allowance. The hate and disdain for his fleeing just like it was back then. Ironically, the present Queen was the one to show a minimal bit of empathy for her Uncle that left to be an American playboy on the arm of his American actress who had carry nicknames for all the members of the Royal family. It’s uncanny. It’s like the followed the playbook.

Huge difference. The spares always are left to beg for money and places to live for themselves and their kids. Look at Charles siblings. Or how hard Andrew had to beg for a wedding for Beatrice. AND Charles has been very clear that he is planning to streamline the monarchy to direct heirs.

Harry is a much better person than his great uncle but honestly gave up much less for love.

Yes, I say good for Harry for leaving and making his own path. He has a beautiful wife, a beautiful son and lots of money. Let the haters hate.

Exactly. How many of these anti-H&M posters would want to turn forty still living at the financial mercy of a parent or older sibling? We tell our children everyday, forge your path and yet these posters are upset that a grown ass man finally did. So what if it took the help of a strong woman to give him the courage, at least he finally took the plunge.

He has the ultimate helicopter grandma