Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My God, with the exception of the title of King, Harry has basically repeated history of his grandmother’s uncle. Fleeing to America with a divorcee and having to beg for an allowance. The hate and disdain for his fleeing just like it was back then. Ironically, the present Queen was the one to show a minimal bit of empathy for her Uncle that left to be an American playboy on the arm of his American actress who had carry nicknames for all the members of the Royal family. It’s uncanny. It’s like the followed the playbook.

Yes, pretty much the same . Meghan leads him and tells him what to do. He is pathetic in those sad videos they post and she is OTT in everything she writes or posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My God, with the exception of the title of King, Harry has basically repeated history of his grandmother’s uncle. Fleeing to America with a divorcee and having to beg for an allowance. The hate and disdain for his fleeing just like it was back then. Ironically, the present Queen was the one to show a minimal bit of empathy for her Uncle that left to be an American playboy on the arm of his American actress who had carry nicknames for all the members of the Royal family. It’s uncanny. It’s like the followed the playbook.

Huge difference. The spares always are left to beg for money and places to live for themselves and their kids. Look at Charles siblings. Or how hard Andrew had to beg for a wedding for Beatrice. AND Charles has been very clear that he is planning to streamline the monarchy to direct heirs.

Harry is a much better person than his great uncle but honestly gave up much less for love.

[Anonymous]

I feel for Harry, but I am sure we will be hearing of the divorce soon.

My own mother died young, and it definitely influenced my partner choices and relationships, and those of my brothers. Somehow that essential relationship being cut short in a sudden, traumatic way caused all of us to try to replay different aspects of how we related to our mother, revisiting things we regretted in our relationship with her as we forged new relationships; it took a long time before a therapist pointed this out to me. But I see Harry doing the same thing.

I think Meghan is quite good at presenting the 'woe is me' act, and this type of person is often quite good at sparking sympathy and protective feelings in others, at least initially. Harry wanted to protect her in a way he couldn't protect his mother. But the Meghan types become exhausting and difficult (note her string of broken relationships), and it is unfortunate Harry didn't heed his brother's advice and wait before plunging into an early marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My God, with the exception of the title of King, Harry has basically repeated history of his grandmother’s uncle. Fleeing to America with a divorcee and having to beg for an allowance. The hate and disdain for his fleeing just like it was back then. Ironically, the present Queen was the one to show a minimal bit of empathy for her Uncle that left to be an American playboy on the arm of his American actress who had carry nicknames for all the members of the Royal family. It’s uncanny. It’s like the followed the playbook.

Yes, pretty much the same . Meghan leads him and tells him what to do. He is pathetic in those sad videos they post and she is OTT in everything she writes or posts.

I think that, as a royal, he was probably used to being advised about behaviour and protocol for every situation, and this is what he is used to doing. He doesn't know how to be truly independent, and that isn't his fault. But Meghan is a strong personality, and manipulative, so she really wasn't the right choice for Harry as a life partner if he truly did want to strike out on his own, away from the royal lifestyle.

[Anonymous]

Personally, I do not understand why she has to be in the news so frequently. I have stopped clicking on any of it since about this time last year, but when I saw this thread pop up, it meant even more headlines. It is all so manufactured and pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Usually a miscarriage has to do with fetal problems.
As hard as it is to lose an unviable fetus, it would be a lifetime of hardship to bring a compromised one into the world.
As well would saddle a sibling with a responsibility that the sibling never asked for.
I've never really understood the self-pity of women who have had miscarriages.
It's fairly common. There is a reason why most people wait until after 12 weeks to inform their families - because after 12 weeks the fetus is usually viable.

I can understand the tragedy of loss in 3rd trimester as that is likely a healthy child with healthy development but for some unfortunate twist of the umbilical cord or other.

I couldn't imagine nor live with the thought of imposing on my kids a lifetime of caring for a disabled brother/sister after their parents pass.

What Markle is actually lamenting is her advanced maternal age and her waning fecundity.

[Anonymous]

The family was supportive of Harry and Meghan when they were actuallu going through their private grief. Meghan obviously needs the public support now, as usual.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/amp34810237/prince-harry-supported-by-charles-william-after-meghan-markle-miscarriage/

[Anonymous]

Next stop: reality tv.

[Anonymous]

We need a new royal family. Keeping up with the Kardashians is ending.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Next stop: reality tv.

100%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Usually a miscarriage has to do with fetal problems.
As hard as it is to lose an unviable fetus, it would be a lifetime of hardship to bring a compromised one into the world.
As well would saddle a sibling with a responsibility that the sibling never asked for.
I've never really understood the self-pity of women who have had miscarriages.
It's fairly common. There is a reason why most people wait until after 12 weeks to inform their families - because after 12 weeks the fetus is usually viable.

I can understand the tragedy of loss in 3rd trimester as that is likely a healthy child with healthy development but for some unfortunate twist of the umbilical cord or other.

I couldn't imagine nor live with the thought of imposing on my kids a lifetime of caring for a disabled brother/sister after their parents pass.

What Markle is actually lamenting is her advanced maternal age and her waning fecundity.

No what Megan is lamenting is her waning public stature, which is all she cares about.

[Anonymous]

I think she is mentally ill and preying on and manipulating a coddled halfwit. It's just sad all-around -- I don't care how much money they "make" or how big their mansion is. She's a talentless nobody who oozes desperation and bottom-rung stock.

[Anonymous]

Is it just one really unhinged, hateful poster here? The level of visceral rage this poster has for MM is remarkable, to say the least. It’s almost like she personally knows MM and has a vendetta against her. I’ve never really seen anything quite like this, especially considering MM is fairly inoffensive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it just one really unhinged, hateful poster here? The level of visceral rage this poster has for MM is remarkable, to say the least. It’s almost like she personally knows MM and has a vendetta against her. I’ve never really seen anything quite like this, especially considering MM is fairly inoffensive.

Man, Jeff was right. Here’s the hyperbole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it just one really unhinged, hateful poster here? The level of visceral rage this poster has for MM is remarkable, to say the least. It’s almost like she personally knows MM and has a vendetta against her. I’ve never really seen anything quite like this, especially considering MM is fairly inoffensive.

The post was deleted but I was called barren for defending her. Someone (or more than one) here is really flipping out about her.