GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

I agree. This is a red herring desperate attempt by Trump to get the case dismissed.

However, I watched some of Willis being questioned and she was combative. I have had a couple of times when I had to testify in court and both lawyers told me to answer the questions with "yes/no" and not to offer any explanations because they would come back and clear up anything that needed to be done.

She was combative because the filings she was there to testify about are full of lies. Trump is combative when he thinks people are lying about him, too. Why is one OK and not the other?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

I agree. This is a red herring desperate attempt by Trump to get the case dismissed.

However, I watched some of Willis being questioned and she was combative. I have had a couple of times when I had to testify in court and both lawyers told me to answer the questions with "yes/no" and not to offer any explanations because they would come back and clear up anything that needed to be done.

A DA is supposed to be aggressive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

That’s not what he said. He said he uses his business credit card for personal expenses too. He gives the statements to his accountant at tax time and separates the personal from the business.

[Anonymous]

What public servant doesn’t keep over $15,000 cash around the house. And when I owe friends thousands of dollars, I give them a brown paper bag full of 10s and 20s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

That’s not what he said. He said he uses his business credit card for personal expenses too. He gives the statements to his accountant at tax time and separates the personal from the business.

Save your breath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

That’s not what he said. He said he uses his business credit card for personal expenses too. He gives the statements to his accountant at tax time and separates the personal from the business.

Save your breath.

That’s how most people do it. Why the eye roll?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What public servant doesn’t keep over $15,000 cash around the house. And when I owe friends thousands of dollars, I give them a brown paper bag full of 10s and 20s.

So, she had a horde of cash laying around her house, but had a tax lien of over $4000 on her AND she claimed in the book about this case that she was nearly destitute in 2018.
Sorry, folks, this doesn't add up.

[Anonymous]

This was a fun 30 seconds at today's hearing.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. I carry thousands in cash if I’m taking cash to a place to pay for something or pay a friend my portion of a joint purchase. I don’t know what you’re talking about. Some people prefer to deal in cash. I don’t even like dealing with cash and I understand that carrying thousands of dollars in cash for a specific reason can happen occasionally and doesn’t mean she’s always got several thousands in her purse. Let’s not be unreasonable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. I carry thousands in cash if I’m taking cash to a place to pay for something or pay a friend my portion of a joint purchase. I don’t know what you’re talking about. Some people prefer to deal in cash. I don’t even like dealing with cash and I understand that carrying thousands of dollars in cash for a specific reason can happen occasionally and doesn’t mean she’s always got several thousands in her purse. Let’s not be unreasonable.

According to her, she has cash A LOT. She keeps up to $15,000 in her home and takes cash on vacations because she can barter better.
But, she used the cash app to pay her friend when she was renting from her.
But, don't you dare ask her about bank statements that would show her withdrawing large sums of money. And, don't you dare ask Wade about bank statements that would show him depositing the large sums she claims she paid him. Those don't exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

I agree. This is a red herring desperate attempt by Trump to get the case dismissed.

However, I watched some of Willis being questioned and she was combative. I have had a couple of times when I had to testify in court and both lawyers told me to answer the questions with "yes/no" and not to offer any explanations because they would come back and clear up anything that needed to be done.

A DA is supposed to be aggressive.

+1 And Fox News’s body language expert called her “direct and forthcoming.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. I carry thousands in cash if I’m taking cash to a place to pay for something or pay a friend my portion of a joint purchase. I don’t know what you’re talking about. Some people prefer to deal in cash. I don’t even like dealing with cash and I understand that carrying thousands of dollars in cash for a specific reason can happen occasionally and doesn’t mean she’s always got several thousands in her purse. Let’s not be unreasonable.

According to her, she has cash A LOT. She keeps up to $15,000 in her home and takes cash on vacations because she can barter better.
But, she used the cash app to pay her friend when she was renting from her.
But, don't you dare ask her about bank statements that would show her withdrawing large sums of money. And, don't you dare ask Wade about bank statements that would show him depositing the large sums she claims she paid him. Those don't exist.

This has been addressed already. The people who want to be paid via CashApp, she pays via CashApp. That’s not hard to understand.
- Landlord who gets paid via Venmo or PayPal because I don’t have CashApp

[Anonymous]

Don’t they have her nailed for lying on a campaign disclosure form? Have you received anything over $100 in value from a person seeking to do business with the office or whatever that standard disclosure is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

A mistress is a woman who is dependent on a man to pay for her housing. Food. Clothes and all other needs and in return is available for all of his sexual demands. She is a kept woman.

Ms. Willis is employed and does not need to depend on a man to provide for her needs. At no time did she testify that she gave him bags of cash.