GA Case

[Anonymous]

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is nothing about being a woman or an AA. This is about someone having HORRIBLE judgment against one of the most influential persons in the world. She just ruined justice for everyone because she was 'lonely'. Don't take the case if you can't sacrifice. She is a huge disappointment.

You are buying into the smear campaign. Congratulations.

It’s not a smear, she blew up her credibility and any patina of professionalism she had sleeping with a married man and sliding him millions of dollars (?) in legal billings. Good lawyers have ethics and judgment. She has none.

So you agree that Trump has no credibility or patina of professionalism?

Sure. Bozos on all sides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

As someone who never wants Trump to be President again...this is exactly my friends don't understand the MAGA cult. The Dems have a cult too.
Just call balls and strikes....going against Trump you have to be perfect....and she clearly didn't get the memo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her explantion for having cash, in context of the African-American experience, makes perfect sense.

And the idea that she or Mr. Wade benefited in some what because of their relationship as it pertains to the trump case, is a crock.

This should all be put to bed.

Yet, she paid the person rent using a Cash App, per her testimony.
Interesting that her claim of reimbursing her lover is not traceable.

I always want a receipt when I pay rent. If there’s ever a question of if it was paid, I want to be able to prove I paid it.

I never ask for receipts from friends or lovers. When I go out with one friend, we take turns paying. When I pay it’s not a gift and when she pays it’s not a gift. We don’t write IOU’s. When I book a girls trip some pay me back with cash apps and some with cash. One writes checks (so annoying). Never issued a receipt to them. When I’ve booked concert tickets with a boyfriend, sometimes he’d pay me back for his ticket, or sometimes he’d pay for the rest of the evening to keep it fair. I didn’t write it in a ledger or issue receipts.

When I go a work trip, I save receipts for reimbursement.

It is absolutely normal to pay in a traceable way in some contexts, and not to care about being able to provide proof of payment in others. It is terribly uninteresting that she didn’t get a receipt from her lover when she reimbursed him for her portion of a trip they took together. If she had kept a receipt book with all their travel and dining expenses and who paid for what, she’d be raked over the coals for that because it’s quite abnormal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

It's not small-minded to have morals and a moral compass. It's not small-minded to not engage in an affair. As Donna Brazile stated, Fani Willis displayed "bad judgment."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Love how she puts the charade into perspective.

Love this. I’m mad at her because everyone knows that when you’re fighting corruption, you have to be beyond reproach. It’s wrong but that’s the way it is. She was the hero we needed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:5 vacation trips in 6 months, this is one horny lady. I want a job like that.

Hearing the trips she went on as someone of means is not a lot.
She went on two cruises...I know a lot of people like that. That is nothing....she just has horrible judgement.

She has abysmal judgment. She's going after Trump. Everyone else knows better, including NY.

Good for her. Maybe we need more bad judgment.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

In which case, one needs to exercise good judgment and not be derailed from the mission by sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

Wow are you WAY off base. Had you listened to today's questioning and testimony you would be completely dispelled of just about every one of of those notions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Oh please. Trump, Steve Bannon and others conducted themselves MUCH worse in testimony and depositions. Reminder, Trump alone refused to answer questions and invoked the 5th no less than 440 times. That's no typo, over FOUR HUNDRED times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

I agree. This is a red herring desperate attempt by Trump to get the case dismissed.

However, I watched some of Willis being questioned and she was combative. I have had a couple of times when I had to testify in court and both lawyers told me to answer the questions with "yes/no" and not to offer any explanations because they would come back and clear up anything that needed to be done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If he was paid to find job then it's his money to send as he pleases.