Physicians Assistant yelling “HELP ME” while stealing a CitiBike ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My, the people trying to malign the PA are salty AF. Seethe!

They are struggling with their own internal misogyny.

They aren’t. They don’t see it as misogyny. Pointing it out changes nothing.

I suppose that is true. Typically progressives deny misogyny on the left exists.

and there it is...

There's always one that has to drag everything back to politics.

God forbid there's ever a discussion where politics isn't mentioned, rest assured the trolls like pp will pathetically insert it in.

+1, complete with lies about the entire Dem leadership calling all white women Karen or something. Sick of that poster, who is probably also the dog whistle poster .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what is happening in the viral video of a woman (in scrubs later ID’s as a PA) on a CitiBike next to a guy who apparently paid for the bike? And yelling and then crying? And can’t make out the dialog except “HELP ME”

Yes. Receipts reveal that the young woman paid for the disputed bike BEFORE the man did.

The young woman then paid for a second bike and left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These men did not post the video. They didn't publicly identify her. And again her lawyer said these were "young men" and he emphasized young men so I am guessing they were minors.

Maybe they sent it to one friend or posted it on one of their social media pages with 10 followers. Maybe they hashtagged it Karen and one of the many sites that troll for viral videos came across it.

The account that posted the video and started the spin about what happened is https://twitter.com/Imposter_Edits. He is still posting about it but has changed his tune.

The young men are likely in hiding as well. Like on here I am sure there are many others desperate to identify them and drag them into similar hate filled online mobs that went after the women. Their lives would be in danger if they were to be identified and the woman involved has said via her lawyer she does not want them going through what she is going through.

I visited that guy’s Twitter and this is what he posted:

“It turns out City Bike allows you to rent a bike by entering a serial number directly into the app. I went through the entire process myself and the only thing stopping me from renting that same bike was geolocation. Anyone in the NY area could produce a canceled receipt for that exact bike from their couch without leaving home.”

So is that admitting he was wrong? As someone who has never rented one of these bikes, I'm confused by the whole thing.

I was a poster who really believed she was in the wrong after watching the video. Her behavior did not seem to match anything I've seen from victims or experienced as a victim myself. Obviously I was wrong.

There weren't really any victims in this. There was a misunderstanding that led to a very minor confrontation as both parties felt they were in the right. She was tired and fed up and wanted to go home and some of that came out. The boys were being rude and she realized she just needed to let it go and get on a differnet bike and go home.

Her lawyer is very professional and not a drama / lime light / dramatizing type. He is an employment lawyer, not a celebrity lawyer. There is no reason to not believe her account (told via her lawyer).

The woman who was out umnered, harassed, and had her fetus threatened, and was humiliated on video on Intermet, who was stalked and scared away from her own home, and was sent away from her job, is certainly a victim. I hope she wins a huge payout. And social media sites need to pay for spreading this stuff recklessly.

Her defamation case is really, really good. Here’s the law:

The four elements of defamation are:

A defendant made an oral or written factual and defamatory statement;
Regarding the plaintiff;
That was published without privilege or authorization to others by the defendant; and
There was resultant injury, unless the statement falls within a category of “per se” harm.
In defamation per se cases, a plaintiff does not need to prove damages. The categories of defamation per se in New York are:

Charging a plaintiff with a serious crime;
Stating false facts that tend to injure a plaintiff in his or her business trade or profession;
Charging that a plaintiff has a loathsome disease;
Imputing that a plaintiff is unchaste.

There are two categories of per se damages I have seen: 1) accusing her of attempted theft (news outlets) 2) accusing her of treating patients improperly due to her racism (twitter activists).

This is why I was particularly astonished that so many outlets didn’t hesitate to state she had committed an attempted theft. That’s rookie league stuff.

Yeah and I love Monique Judge’s tweet where she doubles down and says “I meant precisely and factually every word I said” lol.

[Anonymous]

Marino on Twitter:

“
@AttorneyJMarino
·
8h
I created this account so individuals can tag me as to defamatory statements/videos made against Ms. Comrie. I'm looking for comments labeling Ms. Comrie a: 1) Karen; 2) racist; and/or 3) thief. Also, videos referencing a third party doing the foreging is also actionable.”

Monique judge has already been tagged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marino on Twitter:

“
@AttorneyJMarino
·
8h
I created this account so individuals can tag me as to defamatory statements/videos made against Ms. Comrie. I'm looking for comments labeling Ms. Comrie a: 1) Karen; 2) racist; and/or 3) thief. Also, videos referencing a third party doing the foreging is also actionable.”

Monique judge has already been tagged.

he is not playing!!! wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marino on Twitter:

“
@AttorneyJMarino
·
8h
I created this account so individuals can tag me as to defamatory statements/videos made against Ms. Comrie. I'm looking for comments labeling Ms. Comrie a: 1) Karen; 2) racist; and/or 3) thief. Also, videos referencing a third party doing the foreging is also actionable.”

Monique judge has already been tagged.

I love this lawyer. Someone is finally going after the Karen libelers, but also the other libels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marino on Twitter:

“
@AttorneyJMarino
·
8h
I created this account so individuals can tag me as to defamatory statements/videos made against Ms. Comrie. I'm looking for comments labeling Ms. Comrie a: 1) Karen; 2) racist; and/or 3) thief. Also, videos referencing a third party doing the foreging is also actionable.”

Monique judge has already been tagged.

Monique spent lots of yesterday retweeting third party attacks on the PA. She probably thought she was putting enough distance between herself and defamation. Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marino on Twitter:

“
@AttorneyJMarino
·
8h
I created this account so individuals can tag me as to defamatory statements/videos made against Ms. Comrie. I'm looking for comments labeling Ms. Comrie a: 1) Karen; 2) racist; and/or 3) thief. Also, videos referencing a third party doing the foreging is also actionable.”

Monique judge has already been tagged.

Monique spent lots of yesterday retweeting third party attacks on the PA. She probably thought she was putting enough distance between herself and defamation. Nope.

Saw that. And she also blocked pretty much everyone else. She dug herself in deeper. This is getting so good. Theater of the living!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marino on Twitter:

“
@AttorneyJMarino
·
8h
I created this account so individuals can tag me as to defamatory statements/videos made against Ms. Comrie. I'm looking for comments labeling Ms. Comrie a: 1) Karen; 2) racist; and/or 3) thief. Also, videos referencing a third party doing the foreging is also actionable.”

Monique judge has already been tagged.

I love this lawyer. Someone is finally going after the Karen libelers, but also the other libels.

You know he's not a real lawyer? He's an employment lawyer. /s

[Anonymous]

I’m just bummed they’re not going after the black guy. He’s probably sitting at home laughing his a$$ off, waiting to do it again. Because all he learned from this is he can pull sh¡t like he did and face no consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My, the people trying to malign the PA are salty AF. Seethe!

They are struggling with their own internal misogyny.

They aren’t. They don’t see it as misogyny. Pointing it out changes nothing.

I suppose that is true. Typically progressives deny misogyny on the left exists.

and there it is...

There's always one that has to drag everything back to politics.

God forbid there's ever a discussion where politics isn't mentioned, rest assured the trolls like pp will pathetically insert it in.

+1, complete with lies about the entire Dem leadership calling all white women Karen or something. Sick of that poster, who is probably also the dog whistle poster .

+1 Everything is about politics for them. Have you seen Twitter? Do you know who are obsessed with this case? MAGA crazy people, they are using it to justify their racism. Rational people can understand and acknowledge what happened here without this level of obsession.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m just bummed they’re not going after the black guy. He’s probably sitting at home laughing his a$$ off, waiting to do it again. Because all he learned from this is he can pull sh¡t like he did and face no consequences.

Nah he's watching the PA get rich off this and he's sitting home with nothing. He's never had anything and never will.

[Anonymous]

I love this Monique Judge tweet:

https://twitter.com/thejournalista/status/1658887094931189765

She’s basically saying “Yeah I meant exactly what I wrote factually when I called her a racist thief! It was fact, not my opinion.”

She is staring down bankruptcy now, and totally deserves it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My, the people trying to malign the PA are salty AF. Seethe!

They are struggling with their own internal misogyny.

They aren’t. They don’t see it as misogyny. Pointing it out changes nothing.

I suppose that is true. Typically progressives deny misogyny on the left exists.

and there it is...

There's always one that has to drag everything back to politics.

God forbid there's ever a discussion where politics isn't mentioned, rest assured the trolls like pp will pathetically insert it in.

+1, complete with lies about the entire Dem leadership calling all white women Karen or something. Sick of that poster, who is probably also the dog whistle poster .

+1 Everything is about politics for them. Have you seen Twitter? Do you know who are obsessed with this case? MAGA crazy people, they are using it to justify their racism. Rational people can understand and acknowledge what happened here without this level of obsession.

True, but this is what the Democrats get for tolerating racially toxic language. Which they have been doing for a long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this man is in the right, why not come forward with your receipt as everything is online and he clearly has a phone and speak the truth.

Don’t worry. They’ll be subpeonaed for discovery in the PA’s lawsuits.

Only if the PA pays to find them. So far the police haven't acknowledged anything needing their involvement, and the perpetrators are in hiding.

Citibike has the records and can easily be subpeonaed. And she’s raised all she needs for legal expenses. Not that subpeonaing these records is an expensive task.

I understand you don’t know how litigation and discovery works but feel free to ask questions instead of showing off your ignorance.

Since you're such a talented, high powered attorney, why don't you do it pro bono?
It's a BIG case!!!!!

A lawyer very similar to me has taken it. And I’m sure he’ll make more than enough for it to have been worth his time.