Physicians Assistant yelling “HELP ME” while stealing a CitiBike ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this man is in the right, why not come forward with your receipt as everything is online and he clearly has a phone and speak the truth.

Don’t worry. They’ll be subpeonaed for discovery in the PA’s lawsuits.

Only if the PA pays to find them. So far the police haven't acknowledged anything needing their involvement, and the perpetrators are in hiding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Monique’s latest from about an hour ago:

“The evidence is in the video. The bike is active throughout the entire interaction, which is why her colleague suggested the young man "reset it."

Also evidenced when she walks away from said bike to rent a different one at the end of the video.

The video is his receipt.”

What a terrible liar she is.

Have you considered going to Twitter and whining to her directly instead of behind your keyboard here? What is the purpose of stalking her Twitter account and relaying information about this person here where she is not actively posting? Insanity.

DP. Monique (the coward) has blocked all comments except from people she already follows, i.e. people she's confident might agree with her. PP can't complain directly to Monique.

I was able to correct the record in the comments of her TikTok, just FYI. I didn’t respond to her directly, I just pointed out facts in the replies of her comment sections.

How many sites are you engaged in being a keyboard warrior for this woman?

You’ll be horrified to know I’ve helped her in real life too—and may do even more in the future. And DCUM is full of people with real-life pull. Safe to say this thread has backfired on its OP’s original intention.

Give me a freakin break. People with real life pull don't argue incessantly about some damn lady renting a weird bike on a moms website. More like old hens

Believe whatever you need to believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this man is in the right, why not come forward with your receipt as everything is online and he clearly has a phone and speak the truth.

Don’t worry. They’ll be subpeonaed for discovery in the PA’s lawsuits.

Only if the PA pays to find them. So far the police haven't acknowledged anything needing their involvement, and the perpetrators are in hiding.

Citibike has the records and can easily be subpeonaed. And she’s raised all she needs for legal expenses. Not that subpeonaing these records is an expensive task.

I understand you don’t know how litigation and discovery works but feel free to ask questions instead of showing off your ignorance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Monique’s latest from about an hour ago:

“The evidence is in the video. The bike is active throughout the entire interaction, which is why her colleague suggested the young man "reset it."

Also evidenced when she walks away from said bike to rent a different one at the end of the video.

The video is his receipt.”

That makes no sense and is just more obfuscating and gaslighting, but ok.

I’m curious as to why Monique won’t admit she could be wrong. It’s baffling.

Monique is a grifter who lies for money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These men did not post the video. They didn't publicly identify her. And again her lawyer said these were "young men" and he emphasized young men so I am guessing they were minors.

Maybe they sent it to one friend or posted it on one of their social media pages with 10 followers. Maybe they hashtagged it Karen and one of the many sites that troll for viral videos came across it.

The account that posted the video and started the spin about what happened is https://twitter.com/Imposter_Edits. He is still posting about it but has changed his tune.

The young men are likely in hiding as well. Like on here I am sure there are many others desperate to identify them and drag them into similar hate filled online mobs that went after the women. Their lives would be in danger if they were to be identified and the woman involved has said via her lawyer she does not want them going through what she is going through.

I visited that guy’s Twitter and this is what he posted:

“It turns out City Bike allows you to rent a bike by entering a serial number directly into the app. I went through the entire process myself and the only thing stopping me from renting that same bike was geolocation. Anyone in the NY area could produce a canceled receipt for that exact bike from their couch without leaving home.”

So is that admitting he was wrong? As someone who has never rented one of these bikes, I'm confused by the whole thing.

I was a poster who really believed she was in the wrong after watching the video. Her behavior did not seem to match anything I've seen from victims or experienced as a victim myself. Obviously I was wrong.

There weren't really any victims in this. There was a misunderstanding that led to a very minor confrontation as both parties felt they were in the right. She was tired and fed up and wanted to go home and some of that came out. The boys were being rude and she realized she just needed to let it go and get on a differnet bike and go home.

Her lawyer is very professional and not a drama / lime light / dramatizing type. He is an employment lawyer, not a celebrity lawyer. There is no reason to not believe her account (told via her lawyer).

The woman who was out umnered, harassed, and had her fetus threatened, and was humiliated on video on Intermet, who was stalked and scared away from her own home, and was sent away from her job, is certainly a victim. I hope she wins a huge payout. And social media sites need to pay for spreading this stuff recklessly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These men did not post the video. They didn't publicly identify her. And again her lawyer said these were "young men" and he emphasized young men so I am guessing they were minors.

Maybe they sent it to one friend or posted it on one of their social media pages with 10 followers. Maybe they hashtagged it Karen and one of the many sites that troll for viral videos came across it.

The account that posted the video and started the spin about what happened is https://twitter.com/Imposter_Edits. He is still posting about it but has changed his tune.

The young men are likely in hiding as well. Like on here I am sure there are many others desperate to identify them and drag them into similar hate filled online mobs that went after the women. Their lives would be in danger if they were to be identified and the woman involved has said via her lawyer she does not want them going through what she is going through.

I visited that guy’s Twitter and this is what he posted:

“It turns out City Bike allows you to rent a bike by entering a serial number directly into the app. I went through the entire process myself and the only thing stopping me from renting that same bike was geolocation. Anyone in the NY area could produce a canceled receipt for that exact bike from their couch without leaving home.”

So is that admitting he was wrong? As someone who has never rented one of these bikes, I'm confused by the whole thing.

I was a poster who really believed she was in the wrong after watching the video. Her behavior did not seem to match anything I've seen from victims or experienced as a victim myself. Obviously I was wrong.

There weren't really any victims in this. There was a misunderstanding that led to a very minor confrontation as both parties felt they were in the right. She was tired and fed up and wanted to go home and some of that came out. The boys were being rude and she realized she just needed to let it go and get on a differnet bike and go home.

Her lawyer is very professional and not a drama / lime light / dramatizing type. He is an employment lawyer, not a celebrity lawyer. There is no reason to not believe her account (told via her lawyer).

The woman who was out umnered, harassed, and had her fetus threatened, and was humiliated on video on Intermet, who was stalked and scared away from her own home, and was sent away from her job, is certainly a victim. I hope she wins a huge payout. And social media sites need to pay for spreading this stuff recklessly.

Her defamation case is really, really good. Here’s the law:

The four elements of defamation are:

A defendant made an oral or written factual and defamatory statement;
Regarding the plaintiff;
That was published without privilege or authorization to others by the defendant; and
There was resultant injury, unless the statement falls within a category of “per se” harm.
In defamation per se cases, a plaintiff does not need to prove damages. The categories of defamation per se in New York are:

Charging a plaintiff with a serious crime;
Stating false facts that tend to injure a plaintiff in his or her business trade or profession;
Charging that a plaintiff has a loathsome disease;
Imputing that a plaintiff is unchaste.

There are two categories of per se damages I have seen: 1) accusing her of attempted theft (news outlets) 2) accusing her of treating patients improperly due to her racism (twitter activists).

This is why I was particularly astonished that so many outlets didn’t hesitate to state she had committed an attempted theft. That’s rookie league stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this man is in the right, why not come forward with your receipt as everything is online and he clearly has a phone and speak the truth.

Don’t worry. They’ll be subpeonaed for discovery in the PA’s lawsuits.

Only if the PA pays to find them. So far the police haven't acknowledged anything needing their involvement, and the perpetrators are in hiding.

Citibike has the records and can easily be subpeonaed. And she’s raised all she needs for legal expenses. Not that subpeonaing these records is an expensive task.

I understand you don’t know how litigation and discovery works but feel free to ask questions instead of showing off your ignorance.

Since you're such a talented, high powered attorney, why don't you do it pro bono?
It's a BIG case!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this man is in the right, why not come forward with your receipt as everything is online and he clearly has a phone and speak the truth.

Don’t worry. They’ll be subpeonaed for discovery in the PA’s lawsuits.

Only if the PA pays to find them. So far the police haven't acknowledged anything needing their involvement, and the perpetrators are in hiding.

Citibike has the records and can easily be subpeonaed. And she’s raised all she needs for legal expenses. Not that subpeonaing these records is an expensive task.

I understand you don’t know how litigation and discovery works but feel free to ask questions instead of showing off your ignorance.

Since you're such a talented, high powered attorney, why don't you do it pro bono?
It's a BIG case!!!!!

Yeah, I’m sure those men are worth millions. /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this man is in the right, why not come forward with your receipt as everything is online and he clearly has a phone and speak the truth.

Don’t worry. They’ll be subpeonaed for discovery in the PA’s lawsuits.

Only if the PA pays to find them. So far the police haven't acknowledged anything needing their involvement, and the perpetrators are in hiding.

Citibike has the records and can easily be subpeonaed. And she’s raised all she needs for legal expenses. Not that subpeonaing these records is an expensive task.

I understand you don’t know how litigation and discovery works but feel free to ask questions instead of showing off your ignorance.

Since you're such a talented, high powered attorney, why don't you do it pro bono?
It's a BIG case!!!!!

Yeah, I’m sure those men are worth millions. /s

DP. The men are obviously not the appropriate litigation targets. But there are journalism companies with insurance that are completely appropriate targets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this man is in the right, why not come forward with your receipt as everything is online and he clearly has a phone and speak the truth.

Don’t worry. They’ll be subpeonaed for discovery in the PA’s lawsuits.

Only if the PA pays to find them. So far the police haven't acknowledged anything needing their involvement, and the perpetrators are in hiding.

Citibike has the records and can easily be subpeonaed. And she’s raised all she needs for legal expenses. Not that subpeonaing these records is an expensive task.

I understand you don’t know how litigation and discovery works but feel free to ask questions instead of showing off your ignorance.

Since you're such a talented, high powered attorney, why don't you do it pro bono?
It's a BIG case!!!!!

Yeah, I’m sure those men are worth millions. /s

DP. The men are obviously not the appropriate litigation targets. But there are journalism companies with insurance that are completely appropriate targets.

+1. I would love to see some individuals on social media be held to account as co-defendants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this man is in the right, why not come forward with your receipt as everything is online and he clearly has a phone and speak the truth.

Don’t worry. They’ll be subpeonaed for discovery in the PA’s lawsuits.

Only if the PA pays to find them. So far the police haven't acknowledged anything needing their involvement, and the perpetrators are in hiding.

Citibike has the records and can easily be subpeonaed. And she’s raised all she needs for legal expenses. Not that subpeonaing these records is an expensive task.

I understand you don’t know how litigation and discovery works but feel free to ask questions instead of showing off your ignorance.

Since you're such a talented, high powered attorney, why don't you do it pro bono?
It's a BIG case!!!!!

What a nut case you are.

Yeah, I’m sure those men are worth millions. /s

DP. The men are obviously not the appropriate litigation targets. But there are journalism companies with insurance that are completely appropriate targets.

+1. I would love to see some individuals on social media be held to account as co-defendants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My, the people trying to malign the PA are salty AF. Seethe!

They are struggling with their own internal misogyny.

They aren’t. They don’t see it as misogyny. Pointing it out changes nothing.

I suppose that is true. Typically progressives deny misogyny on the left exists.

and there it is...

There's always one that has to drag everything back to politics.

God forbid there's ever a discussion where politics isn't mentioned, rest assured the trolls like pp will pathetically insert it in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Monique’s latest from about an hour ago:

“The evidence is in the video. The bike is active throughout the entire interaction, which is why her colleague suggested the young man "reset it."

Also evidenced when she walks away from said bike to rent a different one at the end of the video.

The video is his receipt.”

What a terrible liar she is.

Have you considered going to Twitter and whining to her directly instead of behind your keyboard here? What is the purpose of stalking her Twitter account and relaying information about this person here where she is not actively posting? Insanity.

DP. Monique (the coward) has blocked all comments except from people she already follows, i.e. people she's confident might agree with her. PP can't complain directly to Monique.

I was able to correct the record in the comments of her TikTok, just FYI. I didn’t respond to her directly, I just pointed out facts in the replies of her comment sections.

How many sites are you engaged in being a keyboard warrior for this woman?

You’ll be horrified to know I’ve helped her in real life too—and may do even more in the future. And DCUM is full of people with real-life pull. Safe to say this thread has backfired on its OP’s original intention.

Give me a freakin break. People with real life pull don't argue incessantly about some damn lady renting a weird bike on a moms website. More like old hens

and yet, here you are. 🤨

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These men did not post the video. They didn't publicly identify her. And again her lawyer said these were "young men" and he emphasized young men so I am guessing they were minors.

Maybe they sent it to one friend or posted it on one of their social media pages with 10 followers. Maybe they hashtagged it Karen and one of the many sites that troll for viral videos came across it.

The account that posted the video and started the spin about what happened is https://twitter.com/Imposter_Edits. He is still posting about it but has changed his tune.

The young men are likely in hiding as well. Like on here I am sure there are many others desperate to identify them and drag them into similar hate filled online mobs that went after the women. Their lives would be in danger if they were to be identified and the woman involved has said via her lawyer she does not want them going through what she is going through.

I visited that guy’s Twitter and this is what he posted:

“It turns out City Bike allows you to rent a bike by entering a serial number directly into the app. I went through the entire process myself and the only thing stopping me from renting that same bike was geolocation. Anyone in the NY area could produce a canceled receipt for that exact bike from their couch without leaving home.”

So is that admitting he was wrong? As someone who has never rented one of these bikes, I'm confused by the whole thing.

I was a poster who really believed she was in the wrong after watching the video. Her behavior did not seem to match anything I've seen from victims or experienced as a victim myself. Obviously I was wrong.

There weren't really any victims in this. There was a misunderstanding that led to a very minor confrontation as both parties felt they were in the right. She was tired and fed up and wanted to go home and some of that came out. The boys were being rude and she realized she just needed to let it go and get on a differnet bike and go home.

Her lawyer is very professional and not a drama / lime light / dramatizing type. He is an employment lawyer, not a celebrity lawyer. There is no reason to not believe her account (told via her lawyer).

The woman who was out umnered, harassed, and had her fetus threatened, and was humiliated on video on Intermet, who was stalked and scared away from her own home, and was sent away from her job, is certainly a victim. I hope she wins a huge payout. And social media sites need to pay for spreading this stuff recklessly.

Uh... what? umnered?

I'm on her side, but let's be real -- her fetus wasn't threatened.
It's s exaggerations like that which made people not believe her at first, because she seemed overly dramatic and entitled.

I hope she stays far away from the "threatening her fetus" claim, as I don't see that working in her favor at all -- especially after watching her odd performance in that video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These men did not post the video. They didn't publicly identify her. And again her lawyer said these were "young men" and he emphasized young men so I am guessing they were minors.

Maybe they sent it to one friend or posted it on one of their social media pages with 10 followers. Maybe they hashtagged it Karen and one of the many sites that troll for viral videos came across it.

The account that posted the video and started the spin about what happened is https://twitter.com/Imposter_Edits. He is still posting about it but has changed his tune.

The young men are likely in hiding as well. Like on here I am sure there are many others desperate to identify them and drag them into similar hate filled online mobs that went after the women. Their lives would be in danger if they were to be identified and the woman involved has said via her lawyer she does not want them going through what she is going through.

I visited that guy’s Twitter and this is what he posted:

“It turns out City Bike allows you to rent a bike by entering a serial number directly into the app. I went through the entire process myself and the only thing stopping me from renting that same bike was geolocation. Anyone in the NY area could produce a canceled receipt for that exact bike from their couch without leaving home.”

So is that admitting he was wrong? As someone who has never rented one of these bikes, I'm confused by the whole thing.

I was a poster who really believed she was in the wrong after watching the video. Her behavior did not seem to match anything I've seen from victims or experienced as a victim myself. Obviously I was wrong.

There weren't really any victims in this. There was a misunderstanding that led to a very minor confrontation as both parties felt they were in the right. She was tired and fed up and wanted to go home and some of that came out. The boys were being rude and she realized she just needed to let it go and get on a differnet bike and go home.

Her lawyer is very professional and not a drama / lime light / dramatizing type. He is an employment lawyer, not a celebrity lawyer. There is no reason to not believe her account (told via her lawyer).

The woman who was out umnered, harassed, and had her fetus threatened, and was humiliated on video on Intermet, who was stalked and scared away from her own home, and was sent away from her job, is certainly a victim. I hope she wins a huge payout. And social media sites need to pay for spreading this stuff recklessly.

Uh... what? umnered?

I'm on her side, but let's be real -- her fetus wasn't threatened.
It's s exaggerations like that which made people not believe her at first, because she seemed overly dramatic and entitled.

I hope she stays far away from the "threatening her fetus" claim, as I don't see that working in her favor at all -- especially after watching her odd performance in that video.

DP. You’re clearly not on her side if you keep insisting a pregnant woman coming off a 12-hour shift, who has just had her bike physically shoved back into the dock while she was sitting on it, and who is surrounded by four guys heckling her and calling her fetus the r* word, isn’t allowed to cry or call for help.

Your continued criticism of her normal behavior show you’re still trying to justify calling her Karen earlier in the thread.