Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team. If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame. It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved. [/quote] Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? :roll: Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.[/quote] If he was paid to find job then it's his money to send as he pleases. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
