And yet Child's Play is thriving in two locations. Hmmmmm..... |
So you’re saying that Target and the fact that it sources cheap plastic toys from Communist China is responsible for the demise of the American toy store? |
Just wait. At the behest of her developer contributors, Mary Cheh recently got the DC Council to FLUM up Chevy Chase DC for denser development also. Planning Director Andrew Trueblood told the ANC a few months ago that DC’s vision is 6 or 7 story buildings on both sides of the avenue in Chevy Chase. As a result, Child’s Play will be gone before too long. |
Why does every area have to be “destination retail”? |
True. And the developers told everyone that they would have special lower rents for small business tenants like Sullivan’s and Shemaili’s to come back to the new complex. But that promise was never kept. |
Child's Play (with locations in Chevy Chase DC, Arlington, and McLean) can't survive if Connecticut Ave is allowed to have 6-story or 7-story buildings, because...? |
Wow, they expanded their number of locations in the last few years. Amazing. I thought that "NO ONE goes to toy stores anymore". |
Because when upmarket dense mixed use gets built, the losers are small businesses that can’t afford the rents and aren’t welcomed anyway by the project investors because they aren’t national chains with deep balance sheets. |
| Actually, the owner of Child's play would LOVE to have density above his store. Go talk to him about it. Total proponent. Not kidding. |
What's his name? |
https://childsplaytoysandbooks.com/pages/meet-our-staff |
Congrats, you can use Google. Now do you know why he would "LOVE" to up-zoned? Hint: it has nothing to do with selling toys. |
Why do you ask questions you apparently know the answer to, and then drop dark hints about other things you apparently know but aren't telling? |
You are the one who is pretending to be good friends with him. On the other hand, I don't know him nor claim to know him, but he seems like a nice guy. But to get to the point, the reason he would be happy to have his building up-zoned is because he owns the building and it would net him a massive financial windfall. He could partner with a developer, keep his store and clear millions easy. I am not saying it is a good or a bad thing. I don't judge. |
You're responding to multiple posters. So, he owns the building (according to you), which means that if it were upzoned, he wouldn't get evicted by the owner, because he is the owner. All to the good. Win-win. |