Where’s Melania?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh - I don’t care what she does as long as we don’t have to pay for extra security.

+1 She shouldn't move back to NY again, because that cost taxpayers $1 million a day.

This is a non issue for me. We elect a President ( even one as dubious as Trump) and the family of the President needs to be protected. Just because we have been ;lucky with small Presidential families in the recent past, doesn't mean we should complain when one has a larger family. I am also tired of the Stormy Daniels story- I don't really care about the President's private sex life. I do care about all the other detrimental stuff this President and his cronies are doing to our nation and government. That is where the focus should be (and on the lame ass Congress).

I hope Melania is fine and she is just waiting it out until Barron's school year is over and they can escape this town.

Protecting a skyscraper in Manhattan is just ridiculous. Not only is it insanely expensive, the security is taking a toll on the people who live and work in the building, as well as on the surrounding streets.

She could go to live at any of the country clubs and it would be much easier for all involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/05/29/melania-trump-conspiracy-theories-611588?__twitter_impression=true

We get that she’s a private person. But this speculation was fueled by two main factors:

An extended hospital stay for a procedure that typically just needs 3 days of rest.

Her personal twitter account location changed to NY.

I would also add that missing the wreath laying ceremony warrants some explanation. I can’t imagine the backlash if MO had missed such an important event honoring our fallen soldiers without an explanation.

Also, if she doesn’t want the state of her marriage questioned, maybe she should stop rejecting her husband’s hand holding attempts.

FLOTUS is not a private person. She has an extensive staff and budget paid by the US taxpayers.

and yet she is required to work for free

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/05/29/melania-trump-conspiracy-theories-611588?__twitter_impression=true

We get that she’s a private person. But this speculation was fueled by two main factors:

An extended hospital stay for a procedure that typically just needs 3 days of rest.

Her personal twitter account location changed to NY.

I would also add that missing the wreath laying ceremony warrants some explanation. I can’t imagine the backlash if MO had missed such an important event honoring our fallen soldiers without an explanation.

Also, if she doesn’t want the state of her marriage questioned, maybe she should stop rejecting her husband’s hand holding attempts.

FLOTUS is not a private person. She has an extensive staff and budget paid by the US taxpayers.

and yet she is required to work for free

a choice she made willingly. "Personal accountability," I believe is the preferred term.

[Anonymous]

Protecting a skyscraper in Manhattan is just ridiculous. Not only is it insanely expensive, the security is taking a toll on the people who live and work in the building, as well as on the surrounding streets.

Of course, it takes a toll. But, let's be real--anytime a president has a residence in a neighborhood, it takes a toll.

Ask people in Hawaii how they felt about Obama's Christmas visits. Traffic was horrendous and the highways shut down whenever he was in transit. Other tourists were also affected.
Ask the people in Chicago who lived in Obama's neighborhood. Do you think there was not security there?

I'm guessing the Crawford ranch did not cause as much of a problem--except for Cindy Sheehan camping out. But, I'm guessing Kennebunkport is pretty much a mess when Bushes were president.
And, I'm sure if Clinton had been elected that Chelsea's apt building would have extremely tight security.

Sure, the NYC situation is much worse. So, if you run for president you are not allowed own a home in NYC?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/05/29/melania-trump-conspiracy-theories-611588?__twitter_impression=true

We get that she’s a private person. But this speculation was fueled by two main factors:

An extended hospital stay for a procedure that typically just needs 3 days of rest.

Her personal twitter account location changed to NY.

I would also add that missing the wreath laying ceremony warrants some explanation. I can’t imagine the backlash if MO had missed such an important event honoring our fallen soldiers without an explanation.

Also, if she doesn’t want the state of her marriage questioned, maybe she should stop rejecting her husband’s hand holding attempts.

FLOTUS is not a private person. She has an extensive staff and budget paid by the US taxpayers.

and yet she is required to work for free

What "work" is Melania doing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Protecting a skyscraper in Manhattan is just ridiculous. Not only is it insanely expensive, the security is taking a toll on the people who live and work in the building, as well as on the surrounding streets.

Of course, it takes a toll. But, let's be real--anytime a president has a residence in a neighborhood, it takes a toll.

Ask people in Hawaii how they felt about Obama's Christmas visits. Traffic was horrendous and the highways shut down whenever he was in transit. Other tourists were also affected.
Ask the people in Chicago who lived in Obama's neighborhood. Do you think there was not security there?

I'm guessing the Crawford ranch did not cause as much of a problem--except for Cindy Sheehan camping out. But, I'm guessing Kennebunkport is pretty much a mess when Bushes were president.
And, I'm sure if Clinton had been elected that Chelsea's apt building would have extremely tight security.

Sure, the NYC situation is much worse. So, if you run for president you are not allowed own a home in NYC?

Once a year vacation, NBD. Supporting two or more full time residences? No way.

[Anonymous]

A standard tummy tuck is similar to a mini tummy tuck, but can include treatment above the navel. An extensive treatment usually involves liposuction and other treatment extending to the flanks, or love handles. Both of these tummy tuck procedures can require weeks of minimized activity following surgery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A standard tummy tuck is similar to a mini tummy tuck, but can include treatment above the navel. An extensive treatment usually involves liposuction and other treatment extending to the flanks, or love handles. Both of these tummy tuck procedures can require weeks of minimized activity following surgery.

Good to know, as I plan on having this procedure later in the year. Thanks, PP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Protecting a skyscraper in Manhattan is just ridiculous. Not only is it insanely expensive, the security is taking a toll on the people who live and work in the building, as well as on the surrounding streets.

Of course, it takes a toll. But, let's be real--anytime a president has a residence in a neighborhood, it takes a toll.

Ask people in Hawaii how they felt about Obama's Christmas visits. Traffic was horrendous and the highways shut down whenever he was in transit. Other tourists were also affected.
Ask the people in Chicago who lived in Obama's neighborhood. Do you think there was not security there?

I'm guessing the Crawford ranch did not cause as much of a problem--except for Cindy Sheehan camping out. But, I'm guessing Kennebunkport is pretty much a mess when Bushes were president.
And, I'm sure if Clinton had been elected that Chelsea's apt building would have extremely tight security.

Sure, the NYC situation is much worse. So, if you run for president you are not allowed own a home in NYC?

And, don’t forget the folks in Martha’s Vineyard who were looking for a quiet vacation.............

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Protecting a skyscraper in Manhattan is just ridiculous. Not only is it insanely expensive, the security is taking a toll on the people who live and work in the building, as well as on the surrounding streets.

Of course, it takes a toll. But, let's be real--anytime a president has a residence in a neighborhood, it takes a toll.

Ask people in Hawaii how they felt about Obama's Christmas visits. Traffic was horrendous and the highways shut down whenever he was in transit. Other tourists were also affected.
Ask the people in Chicago who lived in Obama's neighborhood. Do you think there was not security there?

I'm guessing the Crawford ranch did not cause as much of a problem--except for Cindy Sheehan camping out. But, I'm guessing Kennebunkport is pretty much a mess when Bushes were president.
And, I'm sure if Clinton had been elected that Chelsea's apt building would have extremely tight security.

Sure, the NYC situation is much worse. So, if you run for president you are not allowed own a home in NYC?

And, don’t forget the folks in Martha’s Vineyard who were looking for a quiet vacation.............

I'm sure you would have freaked out if Michelle Obama moved to Martha's Vineyard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Protecting a skyscraper in Manhattan is just ridiculous. Not only is it insanely expensive, the security is taking a toll on the people who live and work in the building, as well as on the surrounding streets.

Of course, it takes a toll. But, let's be real--anytime a president has a residence in a neighborhood, it takes a toll.

Ask people in Hawaii how they felt about Obama's Christmas visits. Traffic was horrendous and the highways shut down whenever he was in transit. Other tourists were also affected.
Ask the people in Chicago who lived in Obama's neighborhood. Do you think there was not security there?

I'm guessing the Crawford ranch did not cause as much of a problem--except for Cindy Sheehan camping out. But, I'm guessing Kennebunkport is pretty much a mess when Bushes were president.
And, I'm sure if Clinton had been elected that Chelsea's apt building would have extremely tight security.

Sure, the NYC situation is much worse. So, if you run for president you are not allowed own a home in NYC?

And, don’t forget the folks in Martha’s Vineyard who were looking for a quiet vacation.............

I'm sure you would have freaked out if Michelle Obama moved to Martha's Vineyard.

Not at all. She’s free to live wherever she wants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Protecting a skyscraper in Manhattan is just ridiculous. Not only is it insanely expensive, the security is taking a toll on the people who live and work in the building, as well as on the surrounding streets.

Of course, it takes a toll. But, let's be real--anytime a president has a residence in a neighborhood, it takes a toll.

Ask people in Hawaii how they felt about Obama's Christmas visits. Traffic was horrendous and the highways shut down whenever he was in transit. Other tourists were also affected.
Ask the people in Chicago who lived in Obama's neighborhood. Do you think there was not security there?

I'm guessing the Crawford ranch did not cause as much of a problem--except for Cindy Sheehan camping out. But, I'm guessing Kennebunkport is pretty much a mess when Bushes were president.
And, I'm sure if Clinton had been elected that Chelsea's apt building would have extremely tight security.

Sure, the NYC situation is much worse. So, if you run for president you are not allowed own a home in NYC?

And, don’t forget the folks in Martha’s Vineyard who were looking for a quiet vacation.............

I'm sure you would have freaked out if Michelle Obama moved to Martha's Vineyard.

Not at all. She’s free to live wherever she wants.

Yeah. That’s totally been the conservative refrain. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/713215.page#12657244

[Anonymous]

Melania’s tweet today at 2:45:

"I see the media is working overtime speculating where I am & what I'm doing. Rest assured, I'm here at the @WhiteHouse w my family, feeling great, & working hard on behalf of children & the American people!”

Good for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Melania’s tweet today at 2:45:

"I see the media is working overtime speculating where I am & what I'm doing. Rest assured, I'm here at the @WhiteHouse w my family, feeling great, & working hard on behalf of children & the American people!”

Good for her.

Sounds like the Donald wrote that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Melania’s tweet today at 2:45:

"I see the media is working overtime speculating where I am & what I'm doing. Rest assured, I'm here at the @WhiteHouse w my family, feeling great, & working hard on behalf of children & the American people!”

Good for her.

Sounds like the Donald wrote that.

Definitely sounds ORANGE.