Anonymous wrote:
Protecting a skyscraper in Manhattan is just ridiculous. Not only is it insanely expensive, the security is taking a toll on the people who live and work in the building, as well as on the surrounding streets.
Of course, it takes a toll. But, let's be real--anytime a president has a residence in a neighborhood, it takes a toll.
Ask people in Hawaii how they felt about Obama's Christmas visits. Traffic was horrendous and the highways shut down whenever he was in transit. Other tourists were also affected.
Ask the people in Chicago who lived in Obama's neighborhood. Do you think there was not security there?
I'm guessing the Crawford ranch did not cause as much of a problem--except for Cindy Sheehan camping out. But, I'm guessing Kennebunkport is pretty much a mess when Bushes were president.
And, I'm sure if Clinton had been elected that Chelsea's apt building would have extremely tight security.
Sure, the NYC situation is much worse. So, if you run for president you are not allowed own a home in NYC?