"False arrest - ICE falsely accused Lander of assault when there is no evidence he committed assault. They also had no warrant or probably cause, which means ICE's actions may constitute false arrest and a violation of the Fourth Amendment" Hmmm, so sure of yourself on the bolded text. Then you switch to "may". Why is that? I'm sure you are feverishly reviewing footage and have all the answers. |
I have yet to see any evidence to prove the claims against Lander. If you want me to not be so sure then you need to provide evidence that Lander assaulted ICE. As for the "may" context and reading comprehension are not your strong suit. As to whether ICE will face repercussions is up to Lander and his lawyers and whether they want to pursue it. That's why it's conditioned and why I used "may." |
Can you provide a link to any law or regulation that specifies that ICE agents have a duty to identify themselves to the general public? I’ll wait.
Can you point out the threat in my post? I articulated the legal consequences of interfering with an ICE arrest.
Interfering with an ICE arrest or investigation is illegal. To arrest illegals ICE requires reasonable suspicion, a lower standard than probable cause. In the case of Mr. Lander, his actions were all the PC they needed.
Obstructing an officer in the performance of their official duties.
What a twisted take. It’s illegal to shoot people if you aren’t sure what is happening. That’s a murder two charge. |
ICE impersonation on the rise.
This whole secret police thing is going to get real agents killed. Oh well. https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning |
What’s going to get agents killed is left wing people doxxing them so some lunatic can take them out. |
LEOs of all kinds take steps to avoid making their identities public. My DH is a LEO with a federal agency known for apprehending dangerous individuals. Obviously he doesn't want his face out there. Dangerous people have dangerous friends and associates who have no qualms about harming a cop or his family. |
The premise of your defense is BS. People working construction sites, picking produce, bussing tables are not dangerous people. “ICE” is abducting brown people without cause. That’s not law enforcement and it’s unconstitutional. |
Idiots have impersonated law enforcement for decades. That you’re just catching on to it now doesn’t make it more prevalent. |
It’s called reasonable suspicion. It’s a legal term. You can look it up. |
Why do you hate accountability? Is it because having a secret police allows them to do whatever they want without having to answer to their employers, the American people? Someone did all this about 80 years ago and we solved that problem. We will solve it again. |
Based on what, that they are brown and work for a living? |
You are in denial. It’s understandable. https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2024/04/26/3-ways-cults-bait-and-trap-common-people-according-to-a-psychologist/ |
+1000%. Even ICE's own data reveals that only 2.5% of the people they are arresting and detaining have any kind of prior criminal record whatsoever. That's substantially lower than the general US population. IF they were trying to capture MS-13 members that would be a credible argument and with those kinds of people they should take extra precautions. But again, per ICE's own data, 97.5% of the people they are going after have NO gang affiliation or criminal record or anything whatsoever. MOST of the people being arrested and detained are NOT "dangerous people with dangerous friends and associates." |
Why are you so desperate to have people who are simply doing their jobs doxxed? Do you think this is the way the left will get rid of ICE? We know they want to defund them. Is this method even more effective in your mind? |
People typically only get doxxed when they behave like thugs and scumbags |