This is a perceptive, objective post and the women complaining here need to read and re-read it. And I'm a woman, with a DH working at home FT for the past three years, but I have little patience for many of the complaints here. This post gives a valuable insight. Ladies, your DHs were socialized differently from you, as the post above points out for you, if you are willing to listen; do not expect them to magically be able to conjure friendships or keep up friendships the way we do. They need to learn it, just as this male PP notes for you. Will you help them, or will you just keep complaining? |
+1 |
Well, isn’t it lovely that yet again, the problem is foisted upon the women in the relationship. They don’t get to voice any opinion, have any preferences, or the like. PPs insight about men’s friendships is valuable and enlightening - but it’s not up to OP to solve. It’s not up to her to manufacture his happiness, and yes, she gets to complain fully and completely about the loss of lifestyle that SHE is experiencing. |
Got it. People should be happy about things they didn't sign up for like no sex. |
Exactly. There is no doubt that if roles were reversed, and all of the sudden the wives were invading their DH's precious space on a daily basis with no end in sight, all hell would break loose. |
While I understand the point of your post, I can honestly say that if roles were reversed and I became sick/ill/handicapped, my DH would not take care of me. He would likely hire someone to do it, it's crystal clear how selfish he is. So no, I did not sign up for my DH to WFH till eternity. |
+1 Can we stop with the completely hyperbole , strawmen arguments designed to silence women from being anything but sunshine and positivity? I trust if OPs DH was faced with an incurable disease, she would be drawing a different part of her strengths and managing. That said, *she is still allowed to complain in that circumstance, no matter how selfish that may seem* As it is, her DH is still completely functional and it’s irritating her that the changes are impacting her. She can express frustration, disillusionment, disenfranchisement, whatever. The conditions of his life have seemingly improved, while hers have been impacted negatively, and there is no movement to equalize that. It’s not because things *cannot* be equalized, as in the case of illness or death, but purely because the other party likes things the way they are. |