Trying to understand Nicola Peltz Beckham

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Everything is so over the top...
Marc Anthony sounds like such an amateur ( what an exaggerated, dumb thing to say with the bride also in the room) and also full of sh*t...the most beautiful woman in the room is the mother in law? Victoria Beckham? Oh please...these people are so ridiculous, all of them in their own ways.


Yeah that seems insane to me. An average DJ/MC that a UMC person is hiring for their wedding for a few thousand bucks would know better than this!


Marc Anthony was a guest at the wedding, not hired entertainment. Near the end of the celebrations he went up on stage and called up his good friend Victoria. Stupid of him to say she was the most beautiful woman in the room but to still be mad at Victoria for not calling him out and correcting him and saying no Nicola is the fairest of them all is immature.


Yeah this is where recollections may vary because BB said his mom took over what was supposed to be his first dance with Nicola.

This is all so stupid but this is me:



Definitely not the first dance. After dinner, Brooklyn and Nicola did a first dance to Only Fools Rush In then they did a second dance and then Nicola did a dance with her father. Marc Anthony didn’t go on stage until much much later in the evening when everyone was dancing. It could be that Brooklyn and Nicola expected MA to invite Nicola up for the first dance of his performance and they got upset when he invited Nicola. Also by this point in the evening the dancing wasn’t formal as it was all the guests on the dance floor. So maybe the first MA song being a slow dance seemed wrong for Brooklyn and his mom. Seems crossed wires as I doubt MA intentionally tried to ruin their wedding. But it wasn’t the actual first dance.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.


The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.


The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.


Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.


The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!


100%
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Everything is so over the top...
Marc Anthony sounds like such an amateur ( what an exaggerated, dumb thing to say with the bride also in the room) and also full of sh*t...the most beautiful woman in the room is the mother in law? Victoria Beckham? Oh please...these people are so ridiculous, all of them in their own ways.


Yeah that seems insane to me. An average DJ/MC that a UMC person is hiring for their wedding for a few thousand bucks would know better than this!


Marc Anthony was a guest at the wedding, not hired entertainment. Near the end of the celebrations he went up on stage and called up his good friend Victoria. Stupid of him to say she was the most beautiful woman in the room but to still be mad at Victoria for not calling him out and correcting him and saying no Nicola is the fairest of them all is immature.


Yeah this is where recollections may vary because BB said his mom took over what was supposed to be his first dance with Nicola.

This is all so stupid but this is me:



Definitely not the first dance. After dinner, Brooklyn and Nicola did a first dance to Only Fools Rush In then they did a second dance and then Nicola did a dance with her father. Marc Anthony didn’t go on stage until much much later in the evening when everyone was dancing. It could be that Brooklyn and Nicola expected MA to invite Nicola up for the first dance of his performance and they got upset when he invited Nicola. Also by this point in the evening the dancing wasn’t formal as it was all the guests on the dance floor. So maybe the first MA song being a slow dance seemed wrong for Brooklyn and his mom. Seems crossed wires as I doubt MA intentionally tried to ruin their wedding. But it wasn’t the actual first dance.


+1. Marc Anthony is a dude. It wasn't the first dance, it was much later in the evening. Probably everyone had been boozing and he put his foot in his mouth. Everyone can see Nicola is beautiful (she's had work done, but she's attractive for people who like that look). For her to be insecure about her 50+ year old MIL is absolutely ridiculous.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Everything is so over the top...
Marc Anthony sounds like such an amateur ( what an exaggerated, dumb thing to say with the bride also in the room) and also full of sh*t...the most beautiful woman in the room is the mother in law? Victoria Beckham? Oh please...these people are so ridiculous, all of them in their own ways.


Yeah that seems insane to me. An average DJ/MC that a UMC person is hiring for their wedding for a few thousand bucks would know better than this!


Marc Anthony was a guest at the wedding, not hired entertainment. Near the end of the celebrations he went up on stage and called up his good friend Victoria. Stupid of him to say she was the most beautiful woman in the room but to still be mad at Victoria for not calling him out and correcting him and saying no Nicola is the fairest of them all is immature.


Yeah this is where recollections may vary because BB said his mom took over what was supposed to be his first dance with Nicola.

This is all so stupid but this is me:



Definitely not the first dance. After dinner, Brooklyn and Nicola did a first dance to Only Fools Rush In then they did a second dance and then Nicola did a dance with her father. Marc Anthony didn’t go on stage until much much later in the evening when everyone was dancing. It could be that Brooklyn and Nicola expected MA to invite Nicola up for the first dance of his performance and they got upset when he invited Nicola. Also by this point in the evening the dancing wasn’t formal as it was all the guests on the dance floor. So maybe the first MA song being a slow dance seemed wrong for Brooklyn and his mom. Seems crossed wires as I doubt MA intentionally tried to ruin their wedding. But it wasn’t the actual first dance.


It was one of many first dances which makes them seem even more ridiculous.
Anonymous
According to the vogue article from shortly after the wedding, Nicola and Brooklyn did their first dances to I can’t help falling in love with you and only fools rush in (very generic love songs!) following the dinner. And that Marc Anthony came on stage at 11pm.
Anonymous
David and Victoria should follow the British Royal family’s approach: say nothing, carry on, let the toddlers tantrum.

Maybe the BRF was feeding info secretly to the press (?) but I think they won the PR war by publicly staying quiet.

PR firms should advise their clients to NOT do exactly what this poor kid (and Harry) did.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:David and Victoria should follow the British Royal family’s approach: say nothing, carry on, let the toddlers tantrum.

Maybe the BRF was feeding info secretly to the press (?) but I think they won the PR war by publicly staying quiet.

PR firms should advise their clients to NOT do exactly what this poor kid (and Harry) did.


At least this "kid" is in his 20s. Harry is full grown man suffering from arrested development. Plenty of other chances for Brooklyn to have a few more tries at a "first dance" in his next wedding(s). How many does one need at one reception?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:David and Victoria should follow the British Royal family’s approach: say nothing, carry on, let the toddlers tantrum.

Maybe the BRF was feeding info secretly to the press (?) but I think they won the PR war by publicly staying quiet.

PR firms should advise their clients to NOT do exactly what this poor kid (and Harry) did.


At least this "kid" is in his 20s. Harry is full grown man suffering from arrested development. Plenty of other chances for Brooklyn to have a few more tries at a "first dance" in his next wedding(s). How many does one need at one reception?



Please stop with this. Harry served in the British Army for ten years. He wasn't always a layabout a la Brooklyn.
Anonymous
I think Brooklyn is more like Rob Kardashian than Prince Harry. Kris Kardashian manages all of the kids' careers/business opportunities and sets them up for success, but Rob didn't want that public life.

Sounds like Victoria was trying to do the same with her kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:David and Victoria should follow the British Royal family’s approach: say nothing, carry on, let the toddlers tantrum.

Maybe the BRF was feeding info secretly to the press (?) but I think they won the PR war by publicly staying quiet.

PR firms should advise their clients to NOT do exactly what this poor kid (and Harry) did.


At least this "kid" is in his 20s. Harry is full grown man suffering from arrested development. Plenty of other chances for Brooklyn to have a few more tries at a "first dance" in his next wedding(s). How many does one need at one reception?



Please stop with this. Harry served in the British Army for ten years. He wasn't always a layabout a la Brooklyn.


Stop it. Harry is an unemployed man child. Like Brooklyn.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.


The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.


The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.


Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.


The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!


They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.


The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.


The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.


Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.


The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!


They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.


Yes. And that is exactly why the whole thing is so ridiculous and tone deaf. Entertaining, but nobody thinks they’re victims.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.


The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.


The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.


Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.


The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!


They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.


So why are they appealing to the average person? Nobody asked for this.
Anonymous
As a DIL who struggled to adapt and conform to my (then) DH's family culture, I can understand where Nicola is coming from. It can be difficult especially coming from a pretty different family. That said, as I matured I realized I was being difficult myself and actually fairly bratty. Having kids helped me see that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.


The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.


The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.


Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.


The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!


They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.


So why are they appealing to the average person? Nobody asked for this.


Nobody asked Victoria to enter a PR war with them either. Dont be obtuse. Brooklyn was tired of the reconciliation narrative that was coming so he went to IG. Something he should've done a long time ago
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: