Trying to understand Nicola Peltz Beckham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.

The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.

The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.

Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.

The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!

They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.

So why are they appealing to the average person? Nobody asked for this.

Nobody asked Victoria to enter a PR war with them either. Dont be obtuse. Brooklyn was tired of the reconciliation narrative that was coming so he went to IG. Something he should've done a long time ago

PR war doesn't make any sense because all the PR has painted the Beckhams in a bad light. Why would the Beckhams push negative PR about themselves?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.

The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.

The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.

Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.

The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!

100%

+1 million!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.

The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.

The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.

Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.

The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!

They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.

So why are they appealing to the average person? Nobody asked for this.

Nobody asked Victoria to enter a PR war with them either. Dont be obtuse. Brooklyn was tired of the reconciliation narrative that was coming so he went to IG. Something he should've done a long time ago

Why? He's known only as their son. He has zero accomplishments of his own. He comes across badly here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.

The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.

The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.

Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.

The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!

They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.

Yes, obviously an issue for shallow, spoiled, uber wealthy brats accustomed to having everything handed to them and getting their own way. Worse than toddlers, they're stomping their feet and crying, "Unfair, mommy!" Pathetic behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.

The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.

The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.

Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.

The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!

They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.

So why are they appealing to the average person? Nobody asked for this.

Nobody asked Victoria to enter a PR war with them either. Dont be obtuse. Brooklyn was tired of the reconciliation narrative that was coming so he went to IG. Something he should've done a long time ago

Why? He's known only as their son. He has zero accomplishments of his own. He comes across badly here.

So what if he has zero accomplishments?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.

The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.

The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.

Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.

The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!

They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.

So why are they appealing to the average person? Nobody asked for this.

Nobody asked Victoria to enter a PR war with them either. Dont be obtuse. Brooklyn was tired of the reconciliation narrative that was coming so he went to IG. Something he should've done a long time ago

PR war doesn't make any sense because all the PR has painted the Beckhams in a bad light. Why would the Beckhams push negative PR about themselves?

No it hasn't. There have been plenty of stories that put Nicola and Brooklyn in bad light. Do you really think Victoria isn't playing the PR game?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is so ridiculous. These people seem so bored, entitled and self centered. I’m entertained by the spectacle of it but the nature of this conflict is about a clash of egos and airing dirty laundry like this is a terrible look. BB looks like a pawn, much like Harry has been in Meghan’s game of chess. Only the Harry/meghan/BRF was far more interesting given the insight (however one sided) into the monarchy drama.

The royal family was never trying to control Harry like Victoria/David did. They tried hard to give him space. Don't compare them.

The parallels are obvious. People don't respect people who live in such luxury and have so much privilege complaining about such petty things like a dance at a wedding. Not with the real problem so many face. They aren't heroes.

Who said they are heroes or need to be heroes? The wedding dance was obviously added on to pile until the straw broke the camels back. Victoria being a crazy boy mom is not like Harry and the royal family. Sorry.

The point is that the camels back breaking at all is ridiculous. These are not real problems. These are bored, wealthy people with too much time on their hands. And 99% of the world is going to roll their eyes at a sob story about a nepo baby bride not being the center of attention during every second of her million dollar wedding and the overbearing, inappropriate mother in law. Victoria Beckham isn’t nice? Who would’ve guessed!

They are not real problems to you or the average person. It's obvious an issue to the people in question.

So why are they appealing to the average person? Nobody asked for this.

Nobody asked Victoria to enter a PR war with them either. Dont be obtuse. Brooklyn was tired of the reconciliation narrative that was coming so he went to IG. Something he should've done a long time ago

Why? He's known only as their son. He has zero accomplishments of his own. He comes across badly here.

So what if he has zero accomplishments?

Uh because it makes him look like an incredibly whiny loser? Went from Mummy's house to his wife's house. Always needing some woman to take care of him. This prodigal son will return when his wife gets bored of him.

[Anonymous]

I guess Victoria owns the trademark to "Brooklyn Beckham" (and all her kids), and it was due to expire. It doesn't sound quite so nefarious,

"Brand and Culture expert Nick Ede added: 'Situations like this are far more common than people realise in high-profile families but they’re usually handled privately, not in the public eye or as explosively as this one

'The Beckham brand has always been both a family and a business. When a name becomes a global commercial asset, legal protections and trademarks are often put in place early on to safeguard future opportunities and avoid third-party exploitation.

Where this becomes emotionally charged is timing and perception. If a conversation around contracts or trademarks happens during a deeply personal moment like a wedding, it can understandably feel overwhelming or misinterpreted particularly if different advisers are giving different interpretations.

'What may be intended as protection can feel like pressure when trust and communication break down which this certainly feels like it is.

'It’s also important to stress that trademark ownership doesn’t equal control over someone’s life or identity it’s about commercial usage in specific categories. These arrangements are usually designed to future-proof the family rather than restrict individual freedom."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess Victoria owns the trademark to "Brooklyn Beckham" (and all her kids), and it was due to expire. It doesn't sound quite so nefarious,

"Brand and Culture expert Nick Ede added: 'Situations like this are far more common than people realise in high-profile families but they’re usually handled privately, not in the public eye or as explosively as this one

'The Beckham brand has always been both a family and a business. When a name becomes a global commercial asset, legal protections and trademarks are often put in place early on to safeguard future opportunities and avoid third-party exploitation.

Where this becomes emotionally charged is timing and perception. If a conversation around contracts or trademarks happens during a deeply personal moment like a wedding, it can understandably feel overwhelming or misinterpreted particularly if different advisers are giving different interpretations.

'What may be intended as protection can feel like pressure when trust and communication break down which this certainly feels like it is.

'It’s also important to stress that trademark ownership doesn’t equal control over someone’s life or identity it’s about commercial usage in specific categories. These arrangements are usually designed to future-proof the family rather than restrict individual freedom."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15479661/trademark-row-Beckham-feud-Victoria-Brooklyn.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess Victoria owns the trademark to "Brooklyn Beckham" (and all her kids), and it was due to expire. It doesn't sound quite so nefarious,

"Brand and Culture expert Nick Ede added: 'Situations like this are far more common than people realise in high-profile families but they’re usually handled privately, not in the public eye or as explosively as this one

'The Beckham brand has always been both a family and a business. When a name becomes a global commercial asset, legal protections and trademarks are often put in place early on to safeguard future opportunities and avoid third-party exploitation.

Where this becomes emotionally charged is timing and perception. If a conversation around contracts or trademarks happens during a deeply personal moment like a wedding, it can understandably feel overwhelming or misinterpreted particularly if different advisers are giving different interpretations.

'What may be intended as protection can feel like pressure when trust and communication break down which this certainly feels like it is.

'It’s also important to stress that trademark ownership doesn’t equal control over someone’s life or identity it’s about commercial usage in specific categories. These arrangements are usually designed to future-proof the family rather than restrict individual freedom."

Just going to send this. That's wrong on her part. He's 26 now and she doesn't need to be owner of it anymore

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicola Peltz is young, beautiful and obviously rich. Why did she settle for this clown? Her mother married well, she should’ve taken tips from her.

Because wealth isn't enough for these vapid young people. They want celebrity more than anything. Did anything know who she was before she married into the Beckham family? Right.


Look I'm perfectly prepared to believe the Beckham parents are narcissistic and image-obsessed, and that Victoria could not stand to be displaced by a young woman her eldest son is besotted with. But the press seems to be coming entirely from the kids, with Brooklyn parroting his wife's concerns. I guess that's what happens when you raise a weak trustfund kid with no mind of his own. Don't be surprised when the weakness of mind is manipulated by another person against you. They're probably all a-holes but I'm inclined to think Nicola is the worst of them.

The press about this estrangement for the last year + has mostly been from the Beckhams. All the articles overwhelmingly paint the Beckhams as innocent and that they have an evil DIL.

[Anonymous]

I am curious to hear the real story about "signing over his name to his parents." I wonder if it was some sort of ultimatum on their part or just a business suggestion put forth by agents/lawyers and not presented well by V&D to Brooklyn.

BTW, V&D, you can have my name for $5 million. A bargain!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The needing to sign away his name is weird. I get the branding point and that has happened to other business people, but those are faceless entities. Not your family.

I wouldn’t be surprised if it were more nuanced. CAA or whatever agency is managing brand/licensing deals for D&B Beckham and they added the kids onto the agreement.

Requesting that he sign his name away means that the parents didn’t have ownership of his name and wanted it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicola Peltz is young, beautiful and obviously rich. Why did she settle for this clown? Her mother married well, she should’ve taken tips from her.

Because wealth isn't enough for these vapid young people. They want celebrity more than anything. Did anything know who she was before she married into the Beckham family? Right.


Look I'm perfectly prepared to believe the Beckham parents are narcissistic and image-obsessed, and that Victoria could not stand to be displaced by a young woman her eldest son is besotted with. But the press seems to be coming entirely from the kids, with Brooklyn parroting his wife's concerns. I guess that's what happens when you raise a weak trustfund kid with no mind of his own. Don't be surprised when the weakness of mind is manipulated by another person against you. They're probably all a-holes but I'm inclined to think Nicola is the worst of them.

The press about this estrangement for the last year + has mostly been from the Beckhams. All the articles overwhelmingly paint the Beckhams as innocent and that they have an evil DIL.

Seems to be a bit of truth in it if even in his own defense Brooklyn is complaining about wedding problems. How many men are still holding wedding grudges about dances and dresses years later?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing about this makes any sense (although I haven't really done any deep dives about this). Brooklyn claims his parents have been "controlling the narrative" but all of the stories I remember hearing have been negative re Posh and David (Posh wouldn't do the wedding dress, the parents are too controlling, the parents do this, the parents do that). Why would Posh and David leak stories to the press or control a narrative that 100% of the time paints them in a negative light? I don't get it. That makes zero sense.

You’ve missed a lot of articles if you think most articles have been negative toward Posh and Becks.