Is Brianne Nadeau really in trouble?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reason No. 4988880 why we need jungle primaries, at the very least. Public officials should not repeatedly win when more people vote against them than for them. Brianne is 2 for 2 in that department.

Like the other poster, you seem to have forgotten about her first term in which she beat Jim Graham with 59% of the vote in the primary. This is her second re-election campaign, but her third Council campaign.

So she's 1 for 3 in not getting outvoted. That's a good thing? I'd argue the opposite.

I’m arguing for accuracy. Bowser is currently below 50% as well. Does that bother you?

Yes, just as Nadeau getting consistently outvoted should bother you.

She is not getting out-voted. No opponent received more votes. I favor a runoff format, but this is the system we have now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lol! Keep scratching your heads and posting here and wondering why Nadeau won.

Maybe next time work harder organizing and less time complaining online and you would’ve realized that throwing your numbers behind a Republican cop was a terrible choice

It was a better option than the other candidate, whose "Nadeau Light" campaign was perhaps one of the dumbest in DC history. "She's bad at returning emails!" is not gonna change minds.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reason No. 4988880 why we need jungle primaries, at the very least. Public officials should not repeatedly win when more people vote against them than for them. Brianne is 2 for 2 in that department.

Like the other poster, you seem to have forgotten about her first term in which she beat Jim Graham with 59% of the vote in the primary. This is her second re-election campaign, but her third Council campaign.

So she's 1 for 3 in not getting outvoted. That's a good thing? I'd argue the opposite.

I’m arguing for accuracy. Bowser is currently below 50% as well. Does that bother you?

Yes, just as Nadeau getting consistently outvoted should bother you.

She is not getting out-voted. No opponent received more votes. I favor a runoff format, but this is the system we have now.

More people voted against her than for her. Again.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reason No. 4988880 why we need jungle primaries, at the very least. Public officials should not repeatedly win when more people vote against them than for them. Brianne is 2 for 2 in that department.

Like the other poster, you seem to have forgotten about her first term in which she beat Jim Graham with 59% of the vote in the primary. This is her second re-election campaign, but her third Council campaign.

So she's 1 for 3 in not getting outvoted. That's a good thing? I'd argue the opposite.

I’m arguing for accuracy. Bowser is currently below 50% as well. Does that bother you?

Yes, just as Nadeau getting consistently outvoted should bother you.

She is not getting out-voted. No opponent received more votes. I favor a runoff format, but this is the system we have now.

More people voted against her than for her. Again.

“Against Nadeau” was not on the ballot. Other candidates were and none of them received as many votes as she did.

[Anonymous]

Guess we’ll just have to wait for Nadeau’s 4th term to see if she cracks 50%. Oh and her opposition?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guess we’ll just have to wait for Nadeau’s 4th term to see if she cracks 50%.

Don't hate the player, hate the game

[Anonymous]

Keep counting

[Anonymous]

Shssssh. 🤫

Brianne is gone back to hibernating for the next few years.