Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder

[Anonymous]

🤔 Orders everyone to return to the office, doesn’t pay for office space

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:🤔 Orders everyone to return to the office, doesn’t pay for office space

The SpaceX lawyers should be concerned about the licenses if they are really doing this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder when the liberals here will realize Twitter is illustrating the dangers of partisanship. When Twitter was a liberal-run cesspool, you all had nothing to say except “go elsewhere if you don’t like it!” Well, now, the shoe’s on the other foot. Go elsewhere rings hollow, doesn’t it? Maybe just maybe the lesson is that politically-motivated moderation of social media is a problem?

How was it a "cesspool?"

It was a "cesspool" because Twitter was occasionally and reluctantly taking action against your toxic disinformation? It was a "cesspool" because reality was being allowed to flourish, instead of your far right wing bizarro propaganda and talking points?

Example: all the Libs of TikTok did was quote leftist/liberals. That’s it. Banned.

False. That's not "all they did, that's it."

Her account spewed a lot of hate, made a lot of gross misrepresentations, encouraged targeting, harassment and violence toward numerous hospitals, and toward the LGBT community.

Libs of Tik Tok *is* the cesspool.

Bull. Provide examples.

DP. Are you actually trying to deny this happened? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/lgbtq-threats-hospitals-libs-of-tiktok/

I followed the entire saga tweet by tweet and examined wayback machine archives too (which was necessary after the hospital deleted the statements it had made on its own website). Libs of TikTok literally did not lie about a single thing. She quoted the hospital word for word and kept doing so.

See, you can argue that she has malicious intent in amplifying the damaging admissions made by the people and institutions she quotes. But you are outright lying to say she misrepresents anything. The fact that she doesn’t lie and just quotes insane, embarrassing, and disturbing material from people on the far left is what makes her so devastating and impossible to take down. Libel lawsuits will fail, she hasn’t ever broken the law, and she doesn’t even violate Twitter’s rules because quoting someone’s own words is allowed.

Literally everything she does is to stitch together a false tapestry for her right wing audience that falsely portrays all libs as groomers and pedophiles or otherwise depraved and unhinged. It's literally the one and only reason her account even exists.

And here you're ludicrously arguing she isn't misleading. And, it wasn't just "quoting them" - her feed included commentary and editorializing, it misquoted, it fabricated quotes, it took quotes out of context, it constantly misrepresented over and over again.

Don't sit here peddling some fake BS claim that you literally read every single post of hers and saw no such thing because the rest of us did see it, repeatedly.

Which quotes did she take out of context wrt the hospital? Based on the way you’ve come out swinging, I’m sure there are tons of examples, so please share some.

Her "quotes from the hospital" are highly questionable. The only things Libs of Tik Tok cited were alleged calls that never even went beyond what was alleged to be hospital receptionists, Libs of Tik Tok never even spoke to any actual physicians or actual health care providers at the hospital, never had any consultation. No actual health care provider agreed to perform a hysterectomy on a child in the quotes and it would be HIGHLY unusual for a receptionist to make any such statements without an actual consultation, which is why her "quotes" are bogus. Libs of Tik Tok provide no names of anyone she spoke to, no one on record, and no actual hospital health care provider, administrator or anyone authorized to have that conversation or make those statements was ever cited. It's just not credible.

The funny thing about your belated cover-up story is that the hospital never, ever denied that the statements she attributed to the hospital’s website and staff were completely accurate. The hospital has never denied that it is indeed performing double mastectomies on minors. Why do you think you know more about the hospital’s activities than the hospital itself?

“None of the people who were secretly recorded by this activist group deliver care to our patients,” hospital spokeswoman Ariana Ahmadi Perez said. “We do not and have never performed gender-affirming hysterectomies for anyone under the age of 18.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/08/26/childrens-national-hospital-trans-hysterectomies/

You're welcome. You can stop lying now.

How do you know she’s not the one who’s lying?

[Anonymous]

You really have to go well above and beyond to get disbarred. Cases in point: Avenetti and Giuliani.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder when the liberals here will realize Twitter is illustrating the dangers of partisanship. When Twitter was a liberal-run cesspool, you all had nothing to say except “go elsewhere if you don’t like it!” Well, now, the shoe’s on the other foot. Go elsewhere rings hollow, doesn’t it? Maybe just maybe the lesson is that politically-motivated moderation of social media is a problem?

How was it a "cesspool?"

It was a "cesspool" because Twitter was occasionally and reluctantly taking action against your toxic disinformation? It was a "cesspool" because reality was being allowed to flourish, instead of your far right wing bizarro propaganda and talking points?

Example: all the Libs of TikTok did was quote leftist/liberals. That’s it. Banned.

False. That's not "all they did, that's it."

Her account spewed a lot of hate, made a lot of gross misrepresentations, encouraged targeting, harassment and violence toward numerous hospitals, and toward the LGBT community.

Libs of Tik Tok *is* the cesspool.

Bull. Provide examples.

DP. Are you actually trying to deny this happened? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/lgbtq-threats-hospitals-libs-of-tiktok/

I followed the entire saga tweet by tweet and examined wayback machine archives too (which was necessary after the hospital deleted the statements it had made on its own website). Libs of TikTok literally did not lie about a single thing. She quoted the hospital word for word and kept doing so.

See, you can argue that she has malicious intent in amplifying the damaging admissions made by the people and institutions she quotes. But you are outright lying to say she misrepresents anything. The fact that she doesn’t lie and just quotes insane, embarrassing, and disturbing material from people on the far left is what makes her so devastating and impossible to take down. Libel lawsuits will fail, she hasn’t ever broken the law, and she doesn’t even violate Twitter’s rules because quoting someone’s own words is allowed.

Literally everything she does is to stitch together a false tapestry for her right wing audience that falsely portrays all libs as groomers and pedophiles or otherwise depraved and unhinged. It's literally the one and only reason her account even exists.

And here you're ludicrously arguing she isn't misleading. And, it wasn't just "quoting them" - her feed included commentary and editorializing, it misquoted, it fabricated quotes, it took quotes out of context, it constantly misrepresented over and over again.

Don't sit here peddling some fake BS claim that you literally read every single post of hers and saw no such thing because the rest of us did see it, repeatedly.

Which quotes did she take out of context wrt the hospital? Based on the way you’ve come out swinging, I’m sure there are tons of examples, so please share some.

Her "quotes from the hospital" are highly questionable. The only things Libs of Tik Tok cited were alleged calls that never even went beyond what was alleged to be hospital receptionists, Libs of Tik Tok never even spoke to any actual physicians or actual health care providers at the hospital, never had any consultation. No actual health care provider agreed to perform a hysterectomy on a child in the quotes and it would be HIGHLY unusual for a receptionist to make any such statements without an actual consultation, which is why her "quotes" are bogus. Libs of Tik Tok provide no names of anyone she spoke to, no one on record, and no actual hospital health care provider, administrator or anyone authorized to have that conversation or make those statements was ever cited. It's just not credible.

The funny thing about your belated cover-up story is that the hospital never, ever denied that the statements she attributed to the hospital’s website and staff were completely accurate. The hospital has never denied that it is indeed performing double mastectomies on minors. Why do you think you know more about the hospital’s activities than the hospital itself?

“None of the people who were secretly recorded by this activist group deliver care to our patients,” hospital spokeswoman Ariana Ahmadi Perez said. “We do not and have never performed gender-affirming hysterectomies for anyone under the age of 18.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/08/26/childrens-national-hospital-trans-hysterectomies/

You're welcome. You can stop lying now.

How do you know she’s not the one who’s lying?

Yep. She’s working out of the basement of a pizza joint to harvest adenochrome!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder when the liberals here will realize Twitter is illustrating the dangers of partisanship. When Twitter was a liberal-run cesspool, you all had nothing to say except “go elsewhere if you don’t like it!” Well, now, the shoe’s on the other foot. Go elsewhere rings hollow, doesn’t it? Maybe just maybe the lesson is that politically-motivated moderation of social media is a problem?

How was it a "cesspool?"

It was a "cesspool" because Twitter was occasionally and reluctantly taking action against your toxic disinformation? It was a "cesspool" because reality was being allowed to flourish, instead of your far right wing bizarro propaganda and talking points?

Example: all the Libs of TikTok did was quote leftist/liberals. That’s it. Banned.

False. That's not "all they did, that's it."

Her account spewed a lot of hate, made a lot of gross misrepresentations, encouraged targeting, harassment and violence toward numerous hospitals, and toward the LGBT community.

Libs of Tik Tok *is* the cesspool.

Bull. Provide examples.

DP. Are you actually trying to deny this happened? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/lgbtq-threats-hospitals-libs-of-tiktok/

I followed the entire saga tweet by tweet and examined wayback machine archives too (which was necessary after the hospital deleted the statements it had made on its own website). Libs of TikTok literally did not lie about a single thing. She quoted the hospital word for word and kept doing so.

See, you can argue that she has malicious intent in amplifying the damaging admissions made by the people and institutions she quotes. But you are outright lying to say she misrepresents anything. The fact that she doesn’t lie and just quotes insane, embarrassing, and disturbing material from people on the far left is what makes her so devastating and impossible to take down. Libel lawsuits will fail, she hasn’t ever broken the law, and she doesn’t even violate Twitter’s rules because quoting someone’s own words is allowed.

Literally everything she does is to stitch together a false tapestry for her right wing audience that falsely portrays all libs as groomers and pedophiles or otherwise depraved and unhinged. It's literally the one and only reason her account even exists.

And here you're ludicrously arguing she isn't misleading. And, it wasn't just "quoting them" - her feed included commentary and editorializing, it misquoted, it fabricated quotes, it took quotes out of context, it constantly misrepresented over and over again.

Don't sit here peddling some fake BS claim that you literally read every single post of hers and saw no such thing because the rest of us did see it, repeatedly.

Which quotes did she take out of context wrt the hospital? Based on the way you’ve come out swinging, I’m sure there are tons of examples, so please share some.

Her "quotes from the hospital" are highly questionable. The only things Libs of Tik Tok cited were alleged calls that never even went beyond what was alleged to be hospital receptionists, Libs of Tik Tok never even spoke to any actual physicians or actual health care providers at the hospital, never had any consultation. No actual health care provider agreed to perform a hysterectomy on a child in the quotes and it would be HIGHLY unusual for a receptionist to make any such statements without an actual consultation, which is why her "quotes" are bogus. Libs of Tik Tok provide no names of anyone she spoke to, no one on record, and no actual hospital health care provider, administrator or anyone authorized to have that conversation or make those statements was ever cited. It's just not credible.

The funny thing about your belated cover-up story is that the hospital never, ever denied that the statements she attributed to the hospital’s website and staff were completely accurate. The hospital has never denied that it is indeed performing double mastectomies on minors. Why do you think you know more about the hospital’s activities than the hospital itself?

“None of the people who were secretly recorded by this activist group deliver care to our patients,” hospital spokeswoman Ariana Ahmadi Perez said. “We do not and have never performed gender-affirming hysterectomies for anyone under the age of 18.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/08/26/childrens-national-hospital-trans-hysterectomies/

You're welcome. You can stop lying now.

How do you know she’s not the one who’s lying?

Yep. She’s working out of the basement of a pizza joint to harvest adenochrome!

You honestly don’t know until records are laid bare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder when the liberals here will realize Twitter is illustrating the dangers of partisanship. When Twitter was a liberal-run cesspool, you all had nothing to say except “go elsewhere if you don’t like it!” Well, now, the shoe’s on the other foot. Go elsewhere rings hollow, doesn’t it? Maybe just maybe the lesson is that politically-motivated moderation of social media is a problem?

How was it a "cesspool?"

It was a "cesspool" because Twitter was occasionally and reluctantly taking action against your toxic disinformation? It was a "cesspool" because reality was being allowed to flourish, instead of your far right wing bizarro propaganda and talking points?

Example: all the Libs of TikTok did was quote leftist/liberals. That’s it. Banned.

False. That's not "all they did, that's it."

Her account spewed a lot of hate, made a lot of gross misrepresentations, encouraged targeting, harassment and violence toward numerous hospitals, and toward the LGBT community.

Libs of Tik Tok *is* the cesspool.

Bull. Provide examples.

DP. Are you actually trying to deny this happened? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/lgbtq-threats-hospitals-libs-of-tiktok/

I followed the entire saga tweet by tweet and examined wayback machine archives too (which was necessary after the hospital deleted the statements it had made on its own website). Libs of TikTok literally did not lie about a single thing. She quoted the hospital word for word and kept doing so.

See, you can argue that she has malicious intent in amplifying the damaging admissions made by the people and institutions she quotes. But you are outright lying to say she misrepresents anything. The fact that she doesn’t lie and just quotes insane, embarrassing, and disturbing material from people on the far left is what makes her so devastating and impossible to take down. Libel lawsuits will fail, she hasn’t ever broken the law, and she doesn’t even violate Twitter’s rules because quoting someone’s own words is allowed.

Literally everything she does is to stitch together a false tapestry for her right wing audience that falsely portrays all libs as groomers and pedophiles or otherwise depraved and unhinged. It's literally the one and only reason her account even exists.

And here you're ludicrously arguing she isn't misleading. And, it wasn't just "quoting them" - her feed included commentary and editorializing, it misquoted, it fabricated quotes, it took quotes out of context, it constantly misrepresented over and over again.

Don't sit here peddling some fake BS claim that you literally read every single post of hers and saw no such thing because the rest of us did see it, repeatedly.

Which quotes did she take out of context wrt the hospital? Based on the way you’ve come out swinging, I’m sure there are tons of examples, so please share some.

Her "quotes from the hospital" are highly questionable. The only things Libs of Tik Tok cited were alleged calls that never even went beyond what was alleged to be hospital receptionists, Libs of Tik Tok never even spoke to any actual physicians or actual health care providers at the hospital, never had any consultation. No actual health care provider agreed to perform a hysterectomy on a child in the quotes and it would be HIGHLY unusual for a receptionist to make any such statements without an actual consultation, which is why her "quotes" are bogus. Libs of Tik Tok provide no names of anyone she spoke to, no one on record, and no actual hospital health care provider, administrator or anyone authorized to have that conversation or make those statements was ever cited. It's just not credible.

The funny thing about your belated cover-up story is that the hospital never, ever denied that the statements she attributed to the hospital’s website and staff were completely accurate. The hospital has never denied that it is indeed performing double mastectomies on minors. Why do you think you know more about the hospital’s activities than the hospital itself?

“None of the people who were secretly recorded by this activist group deliver care to our patients,” hospital spokeswoman Ariana Ahmadi Perez said. “We do not and have never performed gender-affirming hysterectomies for anyone under the age of 18.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/08/26/childrens-national-hospital-trans-hysterectomies/

You're welcome. You can stop lying now.

How do you know she’s not the one who’s lying?

You said: "The hospital has never denied that it is indeed performing double mastectomies on minors." I provided the denial from the hospital. Therefore, you are a liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder when the liberals here will realize Twitter is illustrating the dangers of partisanship. When Twitter was a liberal-run cesspool, you all had nothing to say except “go elsewhere if you don’t like it!” Well, now, the shoe’s on the other foot. Go elsewhere rings hollow, doesn’t it? Maybe just maybe the lesson is that politically-motivated moderation of social media is a problem?

How was it a "cesspool?"

It was a "cesspool" because Twitter was occasionally and reluctantly taking action against your toxic disinformation? It was a "cesspool" because reality was being allowed to flourish, instead of your far right wing bizarro propaganda and talking points?

Example: all the Libs of TikTok did was quote leftist/liberals. That’s it. Banned.

False. That's not "all they did, that's it."

Her account spewed a lot of hate, made a lot of gross misrepresentations, encouraged targeting, harassment and violence toward numerous hospitals, and toward the LGBT community.

Libs of Tik Tok *is* the cesspool.

Bull. Provide examples.

DP. Are you actually trying to deny this happened? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/lgbtq-threats-hospitals-libs-of-tiktok/

I followed the entire saga tweet by tweet and examined wayback machine archives too (which was necessary after the hospital deleted the statements it had made on its own website). Libs of TikTok literally did not lie about a single thing. She quoted the hospital word for word and kept doing so.

See, you can argue that she has malicious intent in amplifying the damaging admissions made by the people and institutions she quotes. But you are outright lying to say she misrepresents anything. The fact that she doesn’t lie and just quotes insane, embarrassing, and disturbing material from people on the far left is what makes her so devastating and impossible to take down. Libel lawsuits will fail, she hasn’t ever broken the law, and she doesn’t even violate Twitter’s rules because quoting someone’s own words is allowed.

Literally everything she does is to stitch together a false tapestry for her right wing audience that falsely portrays all libs as groomers and pedophiles or otherwise depraved and unhinged. It's literally the one and only reason her account even exists.

And here you're ludicrously arguing she isn't misleading. And, it wasn't just "quoting them" - her feed included commentary and editorializing, it misquoted, it fabricated quotes, it took quotes out of context, it constantly misrepresented over and over again.

Don't sit here peddling some fake BS claim that you literally read every single post of hers and saw no such thing because the rest of us did see it, repeatedly.

Which quotes did she take out of context wrt the hospital? Based on the way you’ve come out swinging, I’m sure there are tons of examples, so please share some.

Her "quotes from the hospital" are highly questionable. The only things Libs of Tik Tok cited were alleged calls that never even went beyond what was alleged to be hospital receptionists, Libs of Tik Tok never even spoke to any actual physicians or actual health care providers at the hospital, never had any consultation. No actual health care provider agreed to perform a hysterectomy on a child in the quotes and it would be HIGHLY unusual for a receptionist to make any such statements without an actual consultation, which is why her "quotes" are bogus. Libs of Tik Tok provide no names of anyone she spoke to, no one on record, and no actual hospital health care provider, administrator or anyone authorized to have that conversation or make those statements was ever cited. It's just not credible.

The funny thing about your belated cover-up story is that the hospital never, ever denied that the statements she attributed to the hospital’s website and staff were completely accurate. The hospital has never denied that it is indeed performing double mastectomies on minors. Why do you think you know more about the hospital’s activities than the hospital itself?

“None of the people who were secretly recorded by this activist group deliver care to our patients,” hospital spokeswoman Ariana Ahmadi Perez said. “We do not and have never performed gender-affirming hysterectomies for anyone under the age of 18.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/08/26/childrens-national-hospital-trans-hysterectomies/

You're welcome. You can stop lying now.

How do you know she’s not the one who’s lying?

Gee, who to believe, the official hospital spokesperson who's there by name giving an official position representing an internationally renowned and respected hospital that has no history of deceit,

...or the wackadoo hatemongering extremist who already been repeatedly caught lying and who hid in anonymity behind a dumb hyperpartisan moniker like "Libs of TikTok?"

Sooo tough to figure out...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder when the liberals here will realize Twitter is illustrating the dangers of partisanship. When Twitter was a liberal-run cesspool, you all had nothing to say except “go elsewhere if you don’t like it!” Well, now, the shoe’s on the other foot. Go elsewhere rings hollow, doesn’t it? Maybe just maybe the lesson is that politically-motivated moderation of social media is a problem?

How was it a "cesspool?"

It was a "cesspool" because Twitter was occasionally and reluctantly taking action against your toxic disinformation? It was a "cesspool" because reality was being allowed to flourish, instead of your far right wing bizarro propaganda and talking points?

Example: all the Libs of TikTok did was quote leftist/liberals. That’s it. Banned.

False. That's not "all they did, that's it."

Her account spewed a lot of hate, made a lot of gross misrepresentations, encouraged targeting, harassment and violence toward numerous hospitals, and toward the LGBT community.

Libs of Tik Tok *is* the cesspool.

Bull. Provide examples.

DP. Are you actually trying to deny this happened? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/lgbtq-threats-hospitals-libs-of-tiktok/

I followed the entire saga tweet by tweet and examined wayback machine archives too (which was necessary after the hospital deleted the statements it had made on its own website). Libs of TikTok literally did not lie about a single thing. She quoted the hospital word for word and kept doing so.

See, you can argue that she has malicious intent in amplifying the damaging admissions made by the people and institutions she quotes. But you are outright lying to say she misrepresents anything. The fact that she doesn’t lie and just quotes insane, embarrassing, and disturbing material from people on the far left is what makes her so devastating and impossible to take down. Libel lawsuits will fail, she hasn’t ever broken the law, and she doesn’t even violate Twitter’s rules because quoting someone’s own words is allowed.

Literally everything she does is to stitch together a false tapestry for her right wing audience that falsely portrays all libs as groomers and pedophiles or otherwise depraved and unhinged. It's literally the one and only reason her account even exists.

And here you're ludicrously arguing she isn't misleading. And, it wasn't just "quoting them" - her feed included commentary and editorializing, it misquoted, it fabricated quotes, it took quotes out of context, it constantly misrepresented over and over again.

Don't sit here peddling some fake BS claim that you literally read every single post of hers and saw no such thing because the rest of us did see it, repeatedly.

Which quotes did she take out of context wrt the hospital? Based on the way you’ve come out swinging, I’m sure there are tons of examples, so please share some.

Her "quotes from the hospital" are highly questionable. The only things Libs of Tik Tok cited were alleged calls that never even went beyond what was alleged to be hospital receptionists, Libs of Tik Tok never even spoke to any actual physicians or actual health care providers at the hospital, never had any consultation. No actual health care provider agreed to perform a hysterectomy on a child in the quotes and it would be HIGHLY unusual for a receptionist to make any such statements without an actual consultation, which is why her "quotes" are bogus. Libs of Tik Tok provide no names of anyone she spoke to, no one on record, and no actual hospital health care provider, administrator or anyone authorized to have that conversation or make those statements was ever cited. It's just not credible.

The funny thing about your belated cover-up story is that the hospital never, ever denied that the statements she attributed to the hospital’s website and staff were completely accurate. The hospital has never denied that it is indeed performing double mastectomies on minors. Why do you think you know more about the hospital’s activities than the hospital itself?

“None of the people who were secretly recorded by this activist group deliver care to our patients,” hospital spokeswoman Ariana Ahmadi Perez said. “We do not and have never performed gender-affirming hysterectomies for anyone under the age of 18.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/08/26/childrens-national-hospital-trans-hysterectomies/

You're welcome. You can stop lying now.

How do you know she’s not the one who’s lying?

Yep. She’s working out of the basement of a pizza joint to harvest adenochrome!

You honestly don’t know until records are laid bare.

You honestly are a lunatic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder when the liberals here will realize Twitter is illustrating the dangers of partisanship. When Twitter was a liberal-run cesspool, you all had nothing to say except “go elsewhere if you don’t like it!” Well, now, the shoe’s on the other foot. Go elsewhere rings hollow, doesn’t it? Maybe just maybe the lesson is that politically-motivated moderation of social media is a problem?

How was it a "cesspool?"

It was a "cesspool" because Twitter was occasionally and reluctantly taking action against your toxic disinformation? It was a "cesspool" because reality was being allowed to flourish, instead of your far right wing bizarro propaganda and talking points?

Example: all the Libs of TikTok did was quote leftist/liberals. That’s it. Banned.

False. That's not "all they did, that's it."

Her account spewed a lot of hate, made a lot of gross misrepresentations, encouraged targeting, harassment and violence toward numerous hospitals, and toward the LGBT community.

Libs of Tik Tok *is* the cesspool.

Bull. Provide examples.

DP. Are you actually trying to deny this happened? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/lgbtq-threats-hospitals-libs-of-tiktok/

I followed the entire saga tweet by tweet and examined wayback machine archives too (which was necessary after the hospital deleted the statements it had made on its own website). Libs of TikTok literally did not lie about a single thing. She quoted the hospital word for word and kept doing so.

See, you can argue that she has malicious intent in amplifying the damaging admissions made by the people and institutions she quotes. But you are outright lying to say she misrepresents anything. The fact that she doesn’t lie and just quotes insane, embarrassing, and disturbing material from people on the far left is what makes her so devastating and impossible to take down. Libel lawsuits will fail, she hasn’t ever broken the law, and she doesn’t even violate Twitter’s rules because quoting someone’s own words is allowed.

Literally everything she does is to stitch together a false tapestry for her right wing audience that falsely portrays all libs as groomers and pedophiles or otherwise depraved and unhinged. It's literally the one and only reason her account even exists.

And here you're ludicrously arguing she isn't misleading. And, it wasn't just "quoting them" - her feed included commentary and editorializing, it misquoted, it fabricated quotes, it took quotes out of context, it constantly misrepresented over and over again.

Don't sit here peddling some fake BS claim that you literally read every single post of hers and saw no such thing because the rest of us did see it, repeatedly.

Which quotes did she take out of context wrt the hospital? Based on the way you’ve come out swinging, I’m sure there are tons of examples, so please share some.

Her "quotes from the hospital" are highly questionable. The only things Libs of Tik Tok cited were alleged calls that never even went beyond what was alleged to be hospital receptionists, Libs of Tik Tok never even spoke to any actual physicians or actual health care providers at the hospital, never had any consultation. No actual health care provider agreed to perform a hysterectomy on a child in the quotes and it would be HIGHLY unusual for a receptionist to make any such statements without an actual consultation, which is why her "quotes" are bogus. Libs of Tik Tok provide no names of anyone she spoke to, no one on record, and no actual hospital health care provider, administrator or anyone authorized to have that conversation or make those statements was ever cited. It's just not credible.

The funny thing about your belated cover-up story is that the hospital never, ever denied that the statements she attributed to the hospital’s website and staff were completely accurate. The hospital has never denied that it is indeed performing double mastectomies on minors. Why do you think you know more about the hospital’s activities than the hospital itself?

“None of the people who were secretly recorded by this activist group deliver care to our patients,” hospital spokeswoman Ariana Ahmadi Perez said. “We do not and have never performed gender-affirming hysterectomies for anyone under the age of 18.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/08/26/childrens-national-hospital-trans-hysterectomies/

You're welcome. You can stop lying now.

How do you know she’s not the one who’s lying?

Yep. She’s working out of the basement of a pizza joint to harvest adenochrome!

You honestly don’t know until records are laid bare.

There was a pregnant ten year old you ghouls said the same of. You guys are insane.

[Anonymous]

Hmmm so much for priority #1?

[Anonymous]

Every accusation is a confession. Let’s see what’s on Musk’s hard drive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:🤔 Orders everyone to return to the office, doesn’t pay for office space

The SpaceX lawyers should be concerned about the licenses if they are really doing this.

Twitter should be worried that their work isn’t covered by attorney-client privilege unless they have been separately retained by Twitter. If they’re doing this with their SpaceX hats on, none of it will be privileged.

Also, plenty if GCs don’t maintain active law licenses. If any of them are working for Twitter as anything other than employees GC and don’t active licenses, they would likely be in violation of ethics rules about unauthorized practice of law.

[Anonymous]

What the hell are Tesla's board and lawyers doing?

He's single handedly destroying the company's valuation. They are down something like 60% as a result of his antics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every accusation is a confession. Let’s see what’s on Musk’s hard drive.

Yikes, you’re probably right.