Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

24 hours still no ARESSTED. WHERE IS THE FBI?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie's last big campaign was an effort to get the Epstein files released. https://www.axios.com/2025/07/15/trump-epstein-maga-charlie-kirk


Do it for Charlie. Release the files.

Bullcrap. He was a time wasting divisive gate-keeper whose job was to brainwash and corral young Americans into voting against their interests, hating their fellow Americans, and ultimately never cease being pro Israel.

Charlie was a lot of different things to a lot of different people but he was always steadfast in his demand that the Epstein files should be released.


The least we could do to honor his legacy is to continue that fight.

I think I know what you’re doing here, but that demand was… not very steadfast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A tweet? Since when is that credible?

It’s a New York Times report which is ten thousand times more credible than Louder with Crowder.

[Anonymous]

Well, now we know who incited the violence. (she took it down, wisely)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:24 hours still no ARESSTED. WHERE IS THE FBI?

Looks like there's a 2:45 press conference with "rapid developments" on the killer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Okay, then not a tweet:

Yeah, I don’t trust that at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't gun violence; this was a targeted assassination of a major leader because of political views. If guns were outlawed, they would have poisoned him, run him over, killed him with a knife, bomb, etc

He was not a leader. He was a podcaster.

I think thats where everyone is not understanding the impact he was a major leader and voice

He was not a leader. Not a government official. Not even a college degree holder. Yes, he had vocal cords. An influencer? Sure.

"Not even a college degree holder."

LOL, well neither are a lot of highly intelligent, highly successful folks. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Richard Branson, Walt Disney, etc...

Different times my friend.
Walt Disney (Born 1901)
Richard Branson (Born 1950)
Bill Gates (Born October 1955)
Steve Jobs (Born February 1955)
Mark Zuckerberg (Born 1984)

My reply isn’t based on intelligence. I have no idea what his IQ was. Replied to “major leader and voice.” Influencer seems to fit. Regardless, genuine RIP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shooter was a highly experienced sniper/marksman. One shot yet so precise from far away. The average person wouldn’t be able to do that. The shooter has some sort of military/government background for sure.I find it hard to believe some hare brained transgender kid was behind this.

and somebody said something about a 12 yr old doing it. However, CK's body guard was feet away and the shot was over many people's heads with cell phones held up. It's not the shot, it's the hit and that it didn't miss. That's why we know it was a pro and the bullet thing is a red herring.

Your claim is laughable.

Millions of Americans could easily have made that shot.

Drop your ignorant conspiracy theory and try doing an iota of research.

Yep. The shot was high and really not a good shot. Most hunters or military trained would have hit the chest. It was not a hard shot. A shot grouping at that range for an average shooter 3-4” inches and a good shooter is 2-3”. So this translates to an average shooter firing three shot which would all hit within a 3-4” circle at 200 yard.

I read one interview with an ex-sniper (miltary) and he seemed to believe the bullet was aimed at his chest but was deflected by Kirk's body armor under his shirt (you can see it more clearly when the bullet hits - the outline of the armor jumps out). With the deflection it went straight up into his neck. An already deformed bullet.

This is idiotic nonsense. Body armor that deflects a bullet at full force to rip your neck out?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shooter was a highly experienced sniper/marksman. One shot yet so precise from far away. The average person wouldn’t be able to do that. The shooter has some sort of military/government background for sure.I find it hard to believe some hare brained transgender kid was behind this.

and somebody said something about a 12 yr old doing it. However, CK's body guard was feet away and the shot was over many people's heads with cell phones held up. It's not the shot, it's the hit and that it didn't miss. That's why we know it was a pro and the bullet thing is a red herring.

Your claim is laughable.

Millions of Americans could easily have made that shot.

Drop your ignorant conspiracy theory and try doing an iota of research.

Yep. The shot was high and really not a good shot. Most hunters or military trained would have hit the chest. It was not a hard shot. A shot grouping at that range for an average shooter 3-4” inches and a good shooter is 2-3”. So this translates to an average shooter firing three shot which would all hit within a 3-4” circle at 200 yard.

I read one interview with an ex-sniper (miltary) and he seemed to believe the bullet was aimed at his chest but was deflected by Kirk's body armor under his shirt (you can see it more clearly when the bullet hits - the outline of the armor jumps out). With the deflection it went straight up into his neck. An already deformed bullet.

This is idiotic nonsense. Body armor that deflects a bullet at full force to rip your neck out?!?

lol ex sniper. the pics ive seen of CK at the event had rock hard nipples punching out his shirt. did he at some point take off his shirt and put body armor on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't gun violence; this was a targeted assassination of a major leader because of political views. If guns were outlawed, they would have poisoned him, run him over, killed him with a knife, bomb, etc

He was not a leader. He was a podcaster.

I think thats where everyone is not understanding the impact he was a major leader and voice

He was not a leader. Not a government official. Not even a college degree holder. Yes, he had vocal cords. An influencer? Sure.

"Not even a college degree holder."

LOL, well neither are a lot of highly intelligent, highly successful folks. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Richard Branson, Walt Disney, etc...

Different times my friend.
Walt Disney (Born 1901)
Richard Branson (Born 1950)
Bill Gates (Born October 1955)
Steve Jobs (Born February 1955)
Mark Zuckerberg (Born 1984)

My reply isn’t based on intelligence. I have no idea what his IQ was. Replied to “major leader and voice.” Influencer seems to fit. Regardless, genuine RIP.

Not sure what a college degree has to do with being a major leader of a movement? But OK, not really worth arguing about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, then not a tweet:

Yeah, I don’t trust that at all.

I mean read the second paragraph. It's not reliable, shouldn't have been published.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Weapon was probably this short action 30-06.

Scope is mounted too far back towards the buttstock. Probably not a professional.

A professional would not have done this inside 200 yards. They would not have left the weapon behind either.

A professional wouldn’t use that rifle or that scope either.

The shooter obviously practiced on a standard flat range where he sighted in the scope. That means, when shooting from an elevated position, it is imperative to aim lower. The scope was sighted for the gravitational bullet drop across a level area from position to target. When firing at a downward angle from elevation there is less gravitational bullet drop.

The shooter aimed center mass and his lack of training caused the bullet to strike 8”-12” high and 6” to the right. He almost missed him altogether. Sadly he got lucky.

At that elevation and distance it would have been .2 mil deflection

Many of us easily understand the conversation by thr 2 PPs above. Go to any PRS competition and everyone there will understand what thr PPs are talking about. Many hunters understand.

As I’ve said: I agree this was NOT a professional, as indicated from the evidence.

This was an amateur, who took the simple step of sighting in his older, .30 calibre hunting rifle, though it appears he failed to correct properly for distance.

This was not some sort of “professional.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't gun violence; this was a targeted assassination of a major leader because of political views. If guns were outlawed, they would have poisoned him, run him over, killed him with a knife, bomb, etc

He was not a leader. He was a podcaster.

I think thats where everyone is not understanding the impact he was a major leader and voice

He was not a leader. Not a government official. Not even a college degree holder. Yes, he had vocal cords. An influencer? Sure.

"Not even a college degree holder."

LOL, well neither are a lot of highly intelligent, highly successful folks. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Richard Branson, Walt Disney, etc...

Different times my friend.
Walt Disney (Born 1901)
Richard Branson (Born 1950)
Bill Gates (Born October 1955)
Steve Jobs (Born February 1955)
Mark Zuckerberg (Born 1984)

My reply isn’t based on intelligence. I have no idea what his IQ was. Replied to “major leader and voice.” Influencer seems to fit. Regardless, genuine RIP.

Not sure what a college degree has to do with being a major leader of a movement? But OK, not really worth arguing about.

white collar workers think they're a lot smarter than they are because they excel at banging out homework *ahem* tasks at work

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A tweet? Since when is that credible?

It’s a New York Times report which is ten thousand times more credible than Louder with Crowder.

Oh nice, the ATF can just claim any suspect has transgender antifa symbols on them now.

[jsteele]

Has anyone noticed physical similarities between the Kirk shooter and the DNC pipe bomber?