Indictment Monday?

[Anonymous]

Nothing to see here...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

What law does this violate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

So? The judge overseeing the FL documents case is a Trump appointee who has been protecting him since the beginning. It's just been announced that she has indefinitely postponed the trial. Does that bother you as well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

What law does this violate?

Must be that little known constitutional amendment that says you’re entitled to a prosecutor of the same political party as you. That’s why all the republicans were outraged about Ken Starr and Brett Kavanaugh investigating Bill Clinton. /s

[Anonymous]

Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

Judge Cannon says 'hold my spritzer'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where do you people get your news from that a simple charge is so confusing? Makes you wonder if they are confusing you on purpose.

He is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records. This is a very straightforward and not at all unique charge. The proof is clear that he has falsified the records. The harder part to prove is the intent, and that is what they are trying to do at the trial (the actual falsifying is clear and not disputed for the most part).

A misdemeanor and the statute of limitations has expired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

So? The judge overseeing the FL documents case is a Trump appointee who has been protecting him since the beginning. It's just been announced that she has indefinitely postponed the trial. Does that bother you as well?

Should I be bothered? Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

So? The judge overseeing the FL documents case is a Trump appointee who has been protecting him since the beginning. It's just been announced that she has indefinitely postponed the trial. Does that bother you as well?

Should I be bothered? Why?

If you’re American, you should be bothered. Trump’s theft of classified documents and failure to secure have compromised our nation and put at risk the lives of foreign people who trusted us. You should be very bothered by the danger Trump’s actions have posed to our national security.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where do you people get your news from that a simple charge is so confusing? Makes you wonder if they are confusing you on purpose.

He is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records. This is a very straightforward and not at all unique charge. The proof is clear that he has falsified the records. The harder part to prove is the intent, and that is what they are trying to do at the trial (the actual falsifying is clear and not disputed for the most part).

A misdemeanor and the statute of limitations has expired.

[Anonymous]

The conservative news bubble is really doing a great job confusing their views.

The NY case is strictly a business fraud case, nothing more, 34 counts of it. It doesn’t matter if he had an affair, the election has no impact here, doesn’t even matter if he actually slept with the porn star. The only thing that matters is that he committed fraud and the prosecutor is trying to prove intent (that it wasn’t just a mistake).

You can’t payoff a pornstar and list it as a legal expense. Neither would a hooker or your cocaine (regardless of how energized it makes you to work) be a business expense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here...

So? The judge overseeing the FL documents case is a Trump appointee who has been protecting him since the beginning. It's just been announced that she has indefinitely postponed the trial. Does that bother you as well?

Should I be bothered? Why?

If you’re American, you should be bothered. Trump’s theft of classified documents and failure to secure have compromised our nation and put at risk the lives of foreign people who trusted us. You should be very bothered by the danger Trump’s actions have posed to our national security.

Gee, for some reason I'm not. I guess after Hilary had a server connected to the internet with all sorts of classified information on it, I guess some documents behind locked doors on a compound with secret service doesn't phase me. Oh well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The conservative news bubble is really doing a great job confusing their views.

The NY case is strictly a business fraud case, nothing more, 34 counts of it. It doesn’t matter if he had an affair, the election has no impact here, doesn’t even matter if he actually slept with the porn star. The only thing that matters is that he committed fraud and the prosecutor is trying to prove intent (that it wasn’t just a mistake).

You can’t payoff a pornstar and list it as a legal expense. Neither would a hooker or your cocaine (regardless of how energized it makes you to work) be a business expense.

Now what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).