Indictment Monday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the defense moves for a mistrial, recall, Stormy already told all of this on national television.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stormy-daniels-describes-her-alleged-affair-with-donald-trump-60-minutes-interview/

The idea that this is new information is simply a lie by the defense.

Trump denies he had an affair/sex/whatever with Stormy. This s not even important to the case but this shows Trump is lying destroying his credibility with the jurors.

Does not matter SCOTUS will have the last say and declare him innocent. They will some how claim jurisdiction over the case and over turn it. It’s not like anyone could do anything. They do not even have to have a relevant reason to take the case. They can just take it. No one can over rule them.

They don’t have jurisdiction.

[Anonymous]

This transcript will be worth reading. When it is available?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the defense moves for a mistrial, recall, Stormy already told all of this on national television.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stormy-daniels-describes-her-alleged-affair-with-donald-trump-60-minutes-interview/

The idea that this is new information is simply a lie by the defense.

But they want to delay things. And muddy the waters.

Her testimony was very damaging to Trump.

I thi k more humiliating than damaging. SNL Cold opening should be phenomenal this Saturday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stormy Daniels is about to be called in New York, who sought to sell her story on Trump and received payment for a NDA. It is not clear what she offers beyond salacious details to embarrass Trump. The NDA is not in dispute...

Regarding salacious details meant to embarrass, I just want to remind everyone that nobody on the right was too bothered when Ken Starr extracted salacious details about Bill Clinton’s sexual encounters with Monica Lewinsky, and then published them in a book.

And it was one Brett Kavanaugh who was leading that questioning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the defense moves for a mistrial, recall, Stormy already told all of this on national television.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stormy-daniels-describes-her-alleged-affair-with-donald-trump-60-minutes-interview/

The idea that this is new information is simply a lie by the defense.

Trump denies he had an affair/sex/whatever with Stormy. This s not even important to the case but this shows Trump is lying destroying his credibility with the jurors.

Does not matter SCOTUS will have the last say and declare him innocent. They will some how claim jurisdiction over the case and over turn it. It’s not like anyone could do anything. They do not even have to have a relevant reason to take the case. They can just take it. No one can over rule them.

They don’t have jurisdiction.

Who is going to tell them that and enforce it? If they say it is in their jurisdiction it is. Maybe the state can appeal the decision to ….SCOTUS?

[Anonymous]

I know it should not shock me in the slightest, because this family is messed up, but can you imagine being the Trump offspring in the courtroom for Stormy's testimony today?

How gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the defense moves for a mistrial, recall, Stormy already told all of this on national television.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stormy-daniels-describes-her-alleged-affair-with-donald-trump-60-minutes-interview/

The idea that this is new information is simply a lie by the defense.

Trump denies he had an affair/sex/whatever with Stormy. This s not even important to the case but this shows Trump is lying destroying his credibility with the jurors.

Does not matter SCOTUS will have the last say and declare him innocent. They will some how claim jurisdiction over the case and over turn it. It’s not like anyone could do anything. They do not even have to have a relevant reason to take the case. They can just take it. No one can over rule them.

SCOTUS doesn't have review of a NY State proceeding.

State prosecuting a federal statute. Surely that is something the Supreme Court can review. There are many more 1/2 baked arguments(like the president has immunity, etc) that could kick this to the Supreme Court. All it takes is the willingness of the court to jump in. They have certainly demonstrated that will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the defense moves for a mistrial, recall, Stormy already told all of this on national television.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stormy-daniels-describes-her-alleged-affair-with-donald-trump-60-minutes-interview/

The idea that this is new information is simply a lie by the defense.

Trump denies he had an affair/sex/whatever with Stormy. This s not even important to the case but this shows Trump is lying destroying his credibility with the jurors.

Does not matter SCOTUS will have the last say and declare him innocent. They will some how claim jurisdiction over the case and over turn it. It’s not like anyone could do anything. They do not even have to have a relevant reason to take the case. They can just take it. No one can over rule them.

They don’t have jurisdiction.

Who is going to tell them that and enforce it? If they say it is in their jurisdiction it is. Maybe the state can appeal the decision to ….SCOTUS?

That isn't how a proceeding like this works. There is no circumstance where a proceeding in a matter like this goes beyond the NY Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the defense moves for a mistrial, recall, Stormy already told all of this on national television.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stormy-daniels-describes-her-alleged-affair-with-donald-trump-60-minutes-interview/

The idea that this is new information is simply a lie by the defense.

Trump denies he had an affair/sex/whatever with Stormy. This s not even important to the case but this shows Trump is lying destroying his credibility with the jurors.

Does not matter SCOTUS will have the last say and declare him innocent. They will some how claim jurisdiction over the case and over turn it. It’s not like anyone could do anything. They do not even have to have a relevant reason to take the case. They can just take it. No one can over rule them.

SCOTUS doesn't have review of a NY State proceeding.

State prosecuting a federal statute. Surely that is something the Supreme Court can review. There are many more 1/2 baked arguments(like the president has immunity, etc) that could kick this to the Supreme Court. All it takes is the willingness of the court to jump in. They have certainly demonstrated that will.

The state is prosecuting NY State law. If this were a federal proceeding, then it would by SDNY, but this is the AG office.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]https://preview.redd.it/the-cruelty-is-the-point-v0-x3wl4jht71zc1.jpeg?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=28bbfc93450f6ac9283a7f8ede094b7e28db3bd8[/twitter]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Hmm.. E Jean Carroll. Grab em by the pussy. Behind the stage walks through the miss America dressing room. Almost like there’s a pattern.

[Anonymous]

He is so gross. I think everyone, whether they want Trump as president or not, can agree on that. Imagine being so sleazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is so gross. I think everyone, whether they want Trump as president or not, can agree on that. Imagine being so sleazy.

And yet, the Evangelicals consider him the second coming of Jesus himself.

[Anonymous]

Her testimony reinforced why they did not want her telling that story right before the election.