Indictment Monday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).

Let’s keep it simple. He paid off a porn star and listed it as a legal expense through his company. This is business fraud. There are 34 counts, you can read them, they are clear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).

Let’s keep it simple. He paid off a porn star and listed it as a legal expense through his company. This is business fraud. There are 34 counts, you can read them, they are clear.

Yes, let's keep it simple. Stormy denied the "affair" IN WRITING.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).

Let’s keep it simple. He paid off a porn star and listed it as a legal expense through his company. This is business fraud. There are 34 counts, you can read them, they are clear.

No, actually it's not clear at all. No fraud whatsoever.

OTOH, I'm still waiting fo rHunter to pay one million in taxes he owes the treasury. Where is that money? Are hookers a business expense as Hunter claimed?

DP. It really is pretty simple. Read the docs posted upthread. Then you'll see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).

Let’s keep it simple. He paid off a porn star and listed it as a legal expense through his company. This is business fraud. There are 34 counts, you can read them, they are clear.

Yes, let's keep it simple. Stormy denied the "affair" IN WRITING.

Because he paid her too. It’s as simple as that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).

Let’s keep it simple. He paid off a porn star and listed it as a legal expense through his company. This is business fraud. There are 34 counts, you can read them, they are clear.

Yes, let's keep it simple. Stormy denied the "affair" IN WRITING.

Because he paid her too. It’s as simple as that.

No, he didn't.

[Anonymous]

Please keep prosecuting. It's working so well for his numbers!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The conservative news bubble is really doing a great job confusing their views.

The NY case is strictly a business fraud case, nothing more, 34 counts of it. It doesn’t matter if he had an affair, the election has no impact here, doesn’t even matter if he actually slept with the porn star. The only thing that matters is that he committed fraud and the prosecutor is trying to prove intent (that it wasn’t just a mistake).

You can’t payoff a pornstar and list it as a legal expense. Neither would a hooker or your cocaine (regardless of how energized it makes you to work) be a business expense.

Now what?

Now we see what Spanky got in return for the $130k he paid her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The conservative news bubble is really doing a great job confusing their views.

The NY case is strictly a business fraud case, nothing more, 34 counts of it. It doesn’t matter if he had an affair, the election has no impact here, doesn’t even matter if he actually slept with the porn star. The only thing that matters is that he committed fraud and the prosecutor is trying to prove intent (that it wasn’t just a mistake).

You can’t payoff a pornstar and list it as a legal expense. Neither would a hooker or your cocaine (regardless of how energized it makes you to work) be a business expense.

Now what?

Now we see what Spanky got in return for the $130k he paid her.

Whatever you have to tell yourself to keep your sanity. This is going to turn out badly for you. Trust me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).

Let’s keep it simple. He paid off a porn star and listed it as a legal expense through his company. This is business fraud. There are 34 counts, you can read them, they are clear.

Yes, let's keep it simple. Stormy denied the "affair" IN WRITING.

Because he paid her too. It’s as simple as that.

No, he didn't.

Semantics. Cohen paid her and Trump reimbursed him and then wrote it off as a legal expense.

[Anonymous]

I can't wait for the judge to put him under house arrest! Please do it.

Seal the 2024 election in his favor!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The conservative news bubble is really doing a great job confusing their views.

The NY case is strictly a business fraud case, nothing more, 34 counts of it. It doesn’t matter if he had an affair, the election has no impact here, doesn’t even matter if he actually slept with the porn star. The only thing that matters is that he committed fraud and the prosecutor is trying to prove intent (that it wasn’t just a mistake).

You can’t payoff a pornstar and list it as a legal expense. Neither would a hooker or your cocaine (regardless of how energized it makes you to work) be a business expense.

Now what?

Now we see what Spanky got in return for the $130k he paid her.

Whatever you have to tell yourself to keep your sanity. This is going to turn out badly for you. Trust me.

If you’re implying that if Trump wins that means it turns out badly for me and the rest of the country, I totally agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).

Let’s keep it simple. He paid off a porn star and listed it as a legal expense through his company. This is business fraud. There are 34 counts, you can read them, they are clear.

Yes, let's keep it simple. Stormy denied the "affair" IN WRITING.

Because he paid her too. It’s as simple as that.

No, he didn't.

She had an NDA and was honoring it. Pretty simple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think that Trump is not admitting to anything with Stormy and why he was so awful in court today is because there was a cheating clause in the pre-nup of his current wife?

He’s angry and embarrassed and thinks he’s special somehow. Apparently he was swearing and behaving in a threatening manner during her testimony.

Stay tuned for a giant rage tweet. Such a toddler.

Special? I'm still trying to figure out what law was broken? Everyone is (outside of your bubble).

Let’s keep it simple. He paid off a porn star and listed it as a legal expense through his company. This is business fraud. There are 34 counts, you can read them, they are clear.

Yes, let's keep it simple. Stormy denied the "affair" IN WRITING.

Again, this does not matter at all. If he paid her, for whatever reason (keep her quiet, embarrassment, public opinion etc.) and then listed it as a legal expense that is fraud. It was simply not a legal expense, that is fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The conservative news bubble is really doing a great job confusing their views.

The NY case is strictly a business fraud case, nothing more, 34 counts of it. It doesn’t matter if he had an affair, the election has no impact here, doesn’t even matter if he actually slept with the porn star. The only thing that matters is that he committed fraud and the prosecutor is trying to prove intent (that it wasn’t just a mistake).

You can’t payoff a pornstar and list it as a legal expense. Neither would a hooker or your cocaine (regardless of how energized it makes you to work) be a business expense.

Now what?

Now we see what Spanky got in return for the $130k he paid her.

Whatever you have to tell yourself to keep your sanity. This is going to turn out badly for you. Trust me.

If you’re implying that if Trump wins that means it turns out badly for me and the rest of the country, I totally agree.

Well, it'll turn out badly for you, but you and others are well deserving, after using our justice system for election interference and nothing more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The conservative news bubble is really doing a great job confusing their views.

The NY case is strictly a business fraud case, nothing more, 34 counts of it. It doesn’t matter if he had an affair, the election has no impact here, doesn’t even matter if he actually slept with the porn star. The only thing that matters is that he committed fraud and the prosecutor is trying to prove intent (that it wasn’t just a mistake).

You can’t payoff a pornstar and list it as a legal expense. Neither would a hooker or your cocaine (regardless of how energized it makes you to work) be a business expense.

Now what?

The sex or lackthereof is immaterial to this case. The case is about the form of the payments and disclosures.

The salacious stuff is important only because had this information come out in late October 2016 when Cohen and Trump were scrambling, it would have absolutely killed his chances of winning. So it shows the motivation of what Trump wanted to cover up and why the $130k was approved so quickly.