Indictment Monday?

[Anonymous]

I would bet a hefty amount that some of MAGA idiot has tried to figure out a way to try a little jury tampering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will solidify those against Biden even more.

More will stay home and not vote for Biden.

It will drive greater numbers to MAGA.

Whenever did you think starting four cases against a former president when it didnt happen in the last hundred years would be seen as anything other than weaponizing the courts against an opponent? People see that as being used against them by the left next.

They realize the democrat party is behind all this.

Also, who thought it was a good idea for Deniro to run his mouth and sound completely unhinged? It has become a circus atmosphere.Good grief.

Show is the previous president who

1) fomented a coup.

Never happened.


2) stole classified documents and didn't return them.

Nothing stolen. He has a RIGHT to have them. So that never happened either.

3) conspired to hide an affair from the electorate with illegal payments

It's not illegal. I know you want it to be. It isn't.

4) conspired with state level actors to steal a state level election

No, he does not. From the National Archives:
https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2023/nr23-016#:~:text=There%20is%20no%20history%2C%20practice,as%20described%20in%20some%20reports.

How much time do outgoing Presidents have to go through their papers to determine what to retain as personal documents?

The Presidential Records Act (PRA) requires the President to separate personal documents from Presidential records before leaving office. 44 U.S.C. 2203(b). The PRA makes clear that, upon the conclusion of the President’s term in office, NARA assumes responsibility for the custody, control, preservation of, and access to the records of a President. 44 U.S.C. 2203(g)(1). The PRA makes the legal status of Presidential records clear and unambiguous, providing that the United States reserves and retains “complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records.” 44 U.S.C. 2202. There is no history, practice, or provision in law for presidents to take official records with them when they leave office to sort through, such as for a two-year period as described in some reports. If a former President or Vice President finds Presidential records among personal materials, he or she is expected to contact NARA in a timely manner to secure the transfer of those Presidential records to NARA.

How are documents in the White House determined to be an official Presidential record or a personal record?

The Presidential Records Act (PRA) defines what constitutes “Presidential records” and what are “personal records.” 44 U.S.C. 2201. Personal records include “diaries, journals, or other personal notes serving as the functional equivalent of a diary or journal which are not prepared or utilized for, or circulated or communicated in the course of, transacting Government business.”

The PRA also requires that all documentary materials “be categorized as Presidential records or personal records upon their creation or receipt and be filed separately.” 44 U.S.C. 2203(b). The President does not have discretion to categorize a Presidential record as a personal record.

There are no classified documents that can be "personal records" and all classified documents are required to be returned to the National Archives. He had no right to retain any documents other than personal documents from anything provided to him during her term in the White House. There were many boxes of documents that did not meet the definitions of personal documents that were required by law to be returned to the National Archives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:is there a way Trump can talk to the jury?
Just talk nothing bad just talk. WHY CAN'T THE DEFEFENT EVER TALK TO THE jury 1-1?

He had the opportunity to testify and declined.

The only smart choice he and his counsel have made in this trial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's comparing himself to Mother Teresa.

Seriously, how do you GOPers excuse this pathetic loser who thrives off his perceived victimhood? And I know Mother Teresa has her own detractors for a lot of reasons pertaining to how she dealt with the poor, but JFC. There is nothing saintly about this guy, nothing selfless. No way he'd hang around the sick and poor. He could barely bring himself to go visit the wounded at Walter Reed Hospital and didn't want wounded vets who were amputees to be in a military parade because he thought they were a downer and didn't look good for Trump.

John Kelly confirmed that last story, by the way. Would a Republican care to respond to it? https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/02/politics/john-kelly-donald-trump-us-service-members-veterans/index.html?utm_source=twCNN&utm_term=link&utm_medium=social&utm_content=2023-10-02T21%3A28%3A04

The answer to this is no, no Republican will respond to this unless it’s to claim a decorated general, John Kelly, is lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will solidify those against Biden even more.

More will stay home and not vote for Biden.

It will drive greater numbers to MAGA.

Whenever did you think starting four cases against a former president when it didnt happen in the last hundred years would be seen as anything other than weaponizing the courts against an opponent? People see that as being used against them by the left next.

They realize the democrat party is behind all this.

Also, who thought it was a good idea for Deniro to run his mouth and sound completely unhinged? It has become a circus atmosphere.Good grief.

Show is the previous president who

1) fomented a coup.

Never happened.


2) stole classified documents and didn't return them.

Nothing stolen. He has a RIGHT to have them. So that never happened either.

3) conspired to hide an affair from the electorate with illegal payments

It's not illegal. I know you want it to be. It isn't.

4) conspired with state level actors to steal a state level election

Never happened.

He doesn’t have the right to keep classified documents. How do you personally reconcile being as anti-American as you are?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will solidify those against Biden even more.

More will stay home and not vote for Biden.

It will drive greater numbers to MAGA.

Whenever did you think starting four cases against a former president when it didnt happen in the last hundred years would be seen as anything other than weaponizing the courts against an opponent? People see that as being used against them by the left next.

They realize the democrat party is behind all this.

Also, who thought it was a good idea for Deniro to run his mouth and sound completely unhinged? It has become a circus atmosphere.Good grief.

Show is the previous president who

1) fomented a coup.

Never happened.


2) stole classified documents and didn't return them.

Nothing stolen. He has a RIGHT to have them. So that never happened either.

3) conspired to hide an affair from the electorate with illegal payments

It's not illegal. I know you want it to be. It isn't.

4) conspired with state level actors to steal a state level election

Never happened.

So, all those people pleading guilty for illegal trespass and armed combat with cops are...lying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will solidify those against Biden even more.

More will stay home and not vote for Biden.

It will drive greater numbers to MAGA.

Whenever did you think starting four cases against a former president when it didnt happen in the last hundred years would be seen as anything other than weaponizing the courts against an opponent? People see that as being used against them by the left next.

They realize the democrat party is behind all this.

Also, who thought it was a good idea for Deniro to run his mouth and sound completely unhinged? It has become a circus atmosphere.Good grief.

Show is the previous president who

1) fomented a coup.

Never happened.


2) stole classified documents and didn't return them.

Nothing stolen. He has a RIGHT to have them. So that never happened either.

3) conspired to hide an affair from the electorate with illegal payments

It's not illegal. I know you want it to be. It isn't.

4) conspired with state level actors to steal a state level election

Never happened.

1) Even Trump called it an insurrection, but he blamed Pelosi: https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/politics/fact-check-trump-january-6/index.html

So, yes, it did happen.

2) Yes, stolen. Why was he moving boxes around to avoid their legal return? Why did he fight the subpoenas?

3) It isn't illegal to have extramarital sex. It isn't illegal to pay hush money. But, what Trump and Cohen did was illegal. There is a reason Cohen plead guilty and served time. Why shouldn't Trump?

4) I guess you admit this happened.

[Anonymous]

This man is a nut and an OG of get Trump etal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This man is a nut and an OG of get Trump etal

Yeah, oddly enough, law enforcement likes to go after crooks. You could say it's their profession.

[Anonymous]

Biden had absolutely nothing to so with the New York STATE trial. The DOJ concerns itself with FEDERAL crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden had absolutely nothing to so with the New York STATE trial. The DOJ concerns itself with FEDERAL crimes.

Of course he does.

The number three prosecutor in the case comes from the DOJ.