ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dem logic would celebrate if the ice agent was run over and killed

He wasn’t, but I would celebrate if that was his just and lawful punishment after being convicted of murder in a court of law. Because that is how we are supposed to carry out death sentences in this country, not letting some uneducated ICE pig shoot whoever he wants whenever his d*ck feels tiny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

They told her to move, she moved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

I'm assuming you're still working yourself up to your point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

Tell your GOP to release the video if its do clear cut

Hmm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:shooting Renee Good in the head from side of car after front wheels past him, at point blank range, is murder

no way to claim she was a “threat”, regardless of what he was doing w/his phone

his conduct against policy👇🏼

state courts should find he does not have immunity

I don't think this is going away. There is too much footage. Just like with the Epstein files. Trump tried to make it go away, but there was too much "footage" to credibly do so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

It seems to be very inconvenient for you to understand that those who are paid taxpayer money to wield the power of the state have a responsibility and an obligation to wield that power responsibly. It’s his job to feel uncomfortable, that is what we are paying him for. Ge is not a judge nor a jury and neither should he be an executioner. The rights of the citizens always come before those of the paid help.

If you can’t understand that, you need to get the h*ll out of America because you missed the whole point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

You're wrong. Officers/agents aren't supposed to step in front of a car in this situation. This has already been established. In an event, he was off to the side and leaned in for the shot.

[Anonymous]

BREAKING:
The Supreme Court rejects an effort to federalize the National Guard without state consent.

Ok, can they protect Americans from ICE now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15447739/ICE-shooter-Filipina-wife-father-Minneapolis.html

Background on the shooter.

Of course he has a mail order Filipino bride.

You are as bad as ICE when you post racist assumptions like that. Just because she isn't white you assume she is a mail order bride. It says her parents are doctors in the Philippines and it doesn't list where she was born just that she is a US Citizen.

You are the worst kind of liberal, you have no idea how hurtful it is for Americans who aren't white who have to hear things like that over and over again . At least with Trumpsters they wear their Maga hats out in the open so you know where you stand. But sure go to a rally to protest ICE and think you are so open minded and caring when in reality you are right there up ICE.

They’re assuming his wife is a mail order bride because the HUSBAND is a pathetic POS you moron.

NP. It’s still racist to call her a mail order bride and it’s unhelpful.

She is a mail order bride. I thought you were all about calling people what they are, and not what they prefer to be called?

Why do you assume all immigrant women married to American men are mail order brides?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15447739/ICE-shooter-Filipina-wife-father-Minneapolis.html

Background on the shooter.

Of course he has a mail order Filipino bride.

You are as bad as ICE when you post racist assumptions like that. Just because she isn't white you assume she is a mail order bride. It says her parents are doctors in the Philippines and it doesn't list where she was born just that she is a US Citizen.

You are the worst kind of liberal, you have no idea how hurtful it is for Americans who aren't white who have to hear things like that over and over again . At least with Trumpsters they wear their Maga hats out in the open so you know where you stand. But sure go to a rally to protest ICE and think you are so open minded and caring when in reality you are right there up ICE.

They’re assuming his wife is a mail order bride because the HUSBAND is a pathetic POS you moron.

Of course any brown person pointing out to a white liberal that it is racist to call someone a mail order bride and post comments like maybe she will be deported even though she is a US citizen has to be a moron.

Thanks for whitesplaining that to all of us brown citizens who aren’t real citizens in your eyes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

That video clearly shows the agent was not hit by the car, or even close to being in harms way.

Not even close to being in harms way? I can’t believe you can type that with a clear conscience. All three of those people near the car were 100% in harms way.

You can’t be taken seriously if you think this was a low stakes situation with no chance for things to go sideways.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

They told her to move, she moved.

The opportunity for her to safely move her car had passed. She failed to move it when she could safely do so. Once officers got out, approached her car, at were literally touching her car telling her to get out- multiple officers right next to her car- she could no longer safely maneuver her car and should have gotten out. I don’t even back out of parking spot if someone is within several feet of my car- for fear of accidentally hitting someone

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

That video clearly shows the agent was not hit by the car, or even close to being in harms way.

Not even close to being in harms way? I can’t believe you can type that with a clear conscience. All three of those people near the car were 100% in harms way.

You can’t be taken seriously if you think this was a low stakes situation with no chance for things to go sideways.

No one that is true, but why were these children out playing in rhe street?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

So I can jump out in front of traffic and start shooting at drivers, and that's perfectly legal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"Elite Training"

Members of ERO’s eight SRTs nationwide are trained to serve high-risk warrants under hazardous conditions, escort dangerous criminal aliens who have been ordered deported and assist local law enforcement agencies during critical incidents.

SRT members undergo a unique combination of specialized training and real-world experiences. The work of the SRT members is often grueling and so is the training they undergo at Ft. Benning, Georgia. SRT training lasts three weeks and includes several components. At a minimum, students must complete a 1.5 mile run in less than 12 minutes, drag a dummy for 25 yards, complete 30 pushups and scale over a six-foot wall in full tactical gear.

https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/eros-special-response-teams-rigorously-trained-and-ready-deploy-moments-notice

99.99% of DCUMAD could not pass these physical requirements.

And? We’re not applying to be an ICE agent. I couldn’t pass the bar but IM NOT TRYING TO BE A LAWYER

Yet you feel quite comfortable critiquing his actions.

Not PP but PP and I are paying his salary so yes we have every right to critique his actions.