Option H is permanent and the old Wootton HS campus will be closed for good?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shout out to all the Pro-H Wootton families with the courage to voice their rational opinions and who are putting in a lot of work behind the scenes. We see you, and we believe in you.


Shout out to you! I am the Cold Spring, Cabin John, Wootton parent that has been accused of being a troll so I went back to read the beginning of this thread and wanted to point out a few things.

See pages 3-6 where I participated in the beginning of this thread.

Pages 8 - 10 are not me but other Pro Option H Wootton parents that make amazing points.

I come back again on Page 69.

So whether you believe it or not ... Pro Option H Wootton parents exist and we are also being heard.


Right. How come none of you bothered to show up to the BOE meeting last week?


Just a heads up that there is more than one person responding to you. Also because as was previously stated...it is not that deep for most people.


Yeah our children’s educational future is definitely “not that deep”.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shout out to all the Pro-H Wootton families with the courage to voice their rational opinions and who are putting in a lot of work behind the scenes. We see you, and we believe in you.


Shout out to you! I am the Cold Spring, Cabin John, Wootton parent that has been accused of being a troll so I went back to read the beginning of this thread and wanted to point out a few things.

See pages 3-6 where I participated in the beginning of this thread.

Pages 8 - 10 are not me but other Pro Option H Wootton parents that make amazing points.

I come back again on Page 69.

So whether you believe it or not ... Pro Option H Wootton parents exist and we are also being heard.


Right. How come none of you bothered to show up to the BOE meeting last week?


Just a heads up that there is more than one person responding to you. Also because as was previously stated...it is not that deep for most people.


Yeah our children’s educational future is definitely “not that deep”.


What exactly will change about your child's educational future that would be negative? All I see are positives... new AV equipment, new chem labs, new computers for AOIT, new athletic spaces....new everything!!! What is the downside from an education perspective? All the same classes, teachers etc just in a new location with better materials....genuine question
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:"MCPS has failed as usual"

The BOE gets their positions via elections. The county council and other local elected officials who influence this situation are also elected. The irony I find in these discussions is that a significant majority of the posters on here voted for our current and prior BOE and County Council. This includes the majority of the Wootton community. These BOE members and other local officials have made their views very clear before people voted for them. So here we are.


I don't think you understand how elections work. It is highly unlikely that these BOE people were a majority of people's first preference.

Usually in a primary you end up picking from half a dozen candidates. Maybe one or two of them have funds from local special interests (developers, businesses, private schools, rich households from across the county, are the primary suspects). They end up on the ticket in the major election as two options no one really likes.

Here’s a clear explanation of how Montgomery County Board of Education (school board) elections work — especially the part you were remembering about primaries, general elections, and the competitive nature of these races:

🗳️ 1. Board of Education Seats & Terms

Montgomery County’s Board of Education has seven full-voting members elected to four-year terms.

There are five district seats and two at-large seats. Candidates must live in the district they’re running in, but all voters countywide vote on every seat up for election.

In addition, a Student Member of the Board (SMOB) is elected annually by students through a separate internal student process.

🗳️ 2. Non-Partisan Elections

School board races in Maryland are non-partisan, meaning candidates do not run with a party label on the ballot.

Other local and state races (like County Council, governor, etc.) are partisan, but the school board itself is officially non-partisan in nomination and election.

🔁 3. Primary Election — If Needed

If three or more candidates file for a seat, a primary election is held to narrow the field.

All voters eligible to vote in the primary can vote on the non-partisan school board race (even if you’re unaffiliated with a party).

This is different from closed partisan primaries, where only party members vote on that party’s candidates.

In that primary, the top two vote-getters advance to the general election.

Example from 2024: incumbents and challengers competed in primary, and the top two from each contest went on to Nov. general election.

🗳️ 4. General Election (November)

The general election is held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November in even-numbered years.

In the general election, the two primary finalists (or the only two candidates, if no primary was needed) compete, and the one with the most votes wins the seat.

If only one or two candidates file, a primary may be skipped. In that case, all candidates go directly to the general.

💼 5. Filing to Run

Candidates file a Certificate of Candidacy with the Montgomery County Board of Elections during a filing period months before the primary.

They must be registered voters in the district they want to represent.

Candidates also usually must file financial disclosure forms as required by state and county law.

💰 6. Campaign Dynamics

Because the elections are technically non-partisan, there are no party primaries in the traditional sense — but interest groups, unions, developers, and political actors do still fund or endorse campaigns.

Endorsements and campaign funding from groups like the Montgomery County Education Association (teachers’ union) and other community or business organizations can be powerful and influential in these races, affecting who makes it through the primary and then wins in November.

Local press and advocacy groups often highlight these endorsements and funding patterns in their guides and coverage.

📊 7. Who Votes

Every registered voter in Montgomery County sees school board races on their ballot in both the primary and general election if those races are contested.

Unaffiliated voters may vote in the school board primary, even though they might not be able to vote in partisan primaries.

🧠 Summary

✔️ School board elections are non-partisan.
✔️ Primary elections are used when too many candidates file; top two advance.
✔️ General election decides the winner in November.
✔️ All county voters vote on these races, regardless of where they live in the county.
✔️ Local campaigning and funding (from unions, civic groups, developers, etc.) still plays a big role even in non-partisan elections.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I didn't see any bones for any kind of athletic fields when I drove by Crown recently. Are they just not going to have a football ball field, track or anything else that high schools have? Also it’s so ugly and way too close to the townhouses.


Yes, it will have a stadium with track, and baseball and softball fields.
Anonymous
Cold Spring: The area is very nice and it will not be impacted as much as the others, but a move to Crown will mean a significant hit for Cold Spring area real estate. When sold, those houses compete with Churchill real estate. So if a future family is shopping for houses, are they going to pay the same for Fox Hills West and Crown as they will for Fox Hills and Churchill?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Cold Spring: The area is very nice and it will not be impacted as much as the others, but a move to Crown will mean a significant hit for Cold Spring area real estate. When sold, those houses compete with Churchill real estate. So if a future family is shopping for houses, are they going to pay the same for Fox Hills West and Crown as they will for Fox Hills and Churchill?

The BOE's job is not to care about your house value, though I also would be concerned about my own house value, but that's not the BOE's concern, nor should it be.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Cold Spring: The area is very nice and it will not be impacted as much as the others, but a move to Crown will mean a significant hit for Cold Spring area real estate. When sold, those houses compete with Churchill real estate. So if a future family is shopping for houses, are they going to pay the same for Fox Hills West and Crown as they will for Fox Hills and Churchill?


I live here and I don't care...decisions for a majority cannot be made for the minority
Anonymous
What I find so disheartening in this thread and the anti-H ranting is how pervasive conspiracy-theory mindsets are, and how they completely hijack discussions on the merits of an issue. Instead of focusing on the actual relevant questions, such as what does the best data show regarding enrollment projections and how can we use limited county funds to perform all the necessary renovations at the schools that need them in the fastest way possible, we have people who actually believe that BOE, Taylor & MCPS have this grand scheme to punish Wootton. Such ill motives are ascribed to elected officials and public servants with absolutely zero basis! Why would any BOE member or Taylor want to hurt a flagship school?! It’s patently absurd. Then they claim that people commenting in this very thread are out to get Wootton, as if everyone is motivated to harm one of the best schools in MD for zero reason. Make it make sense.

These conspiracy theorists need to listen to the public hearings from the Fall to see how Crown as a holding school came up back in October (not November). Taylor even talked to the press about the possibility as soon as the new declining enrollment data came out one week after options A-D were released. It was that data, in combination with the testimonies about the urgent need for renovations at Damascus and other schools, including Wootton, that forced BOE to be creative to figure out how to adjust. The whole point of Crown as a holding school is because the testimony was that performing renovations with students on site would take way too long and too much money. I remember hearing some information specifically about the impossibility of Damascus being renovated while students are still there because of the land and building.

Anyway, saving hundreds of millions of dollars and being able to have Wootton kids in a new building as a holding school or new school was the reason for this. It’s not some wE wAnT tO rUiN WoOToN wAlKeR fAmIlIes’ pRopErTy vAlUEs for funsies conspiracy. Nor is it some vast liberal conspiracy to punish wealthy Wootton families. It’s smart planning and efficient use of taxpayer dollars to try to renovate as quickly and cheaply as possible by using a holding school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shout out to all the Pro-H Wootton families with the courage to voice their rational opinions and who are putting in a lot of work behind the scenes. We see you, and we believe in you.


Shout out to you! I am the Cold Spring, Cabin John, Wootton parent that has been accused of being a troll so I went back to read the beginning of this thread and wanted to point out a few things.

See pages 3-6 where I participated in the beginning of this thread.

Pages 8 - 10 are not me but other Pro Option H Wootton parents that make amazing points.

I come back again on Page 69.

So whether you believe it or not ... Pro Option H Wootton parents exist and we are also being heard.


Right. How come none of you bothered to show up to the BOE meeting last week?


Just a heads up that there is more than one person responding to you. Also because as was previously stated...it is not that deep for most people.


Yeah our children’s educational future is definitely “not that deep”.


What exactly will change about your child's educational future that would be negative? All I see are positives... new AV equipment, new chem labs, new computers for AOIT, new athletic spaces....new everything!!! What is the downside from an education perspective? All the same classes, teachers etc just in a new location with better materials....genuine question


It’s the people.., their kids will have to be around Gaithersburg people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What I find so disheartening in this thread and the anti-H ranting is how pervasive conspiracy-theory mindsets are, and how they completely hijack discussions on the merits of an issue. Instead of focusing on the actual relevant questions, such as what does the best data show regarding enrollment projections and how can we use limited county funds to perform all the necessary renovations at the schools that need them in the fastest way possible, we have people who actually believe that BOE, Taylor & MCPS have this grand scheme to punish Wootton. Such ill motives are ascribed to elected officials and public servants with absolutely zero basis! Why would any BOE member or Taylor want to hurt a flagship school?! It’s patently absurd. Then they claim that people commenting in this very thread are out to get Wootton, as if everyone is motivated to harm one of the best schools in MD for zero reason. Make it make sense.

These conspiracy theorists need to listen to the public hearings from the Fall to see how Crown as a holding school came up back in October (not November). Taylor even talked to the press about the possibility as soon as the new declining enrollment data came out one week after options A-D were released. It was that data, in combination with the testimonies about the urgent need for renovations at Damascus and other schools, including Wootton, that forced BOE to be creative to figure out how to adjust. The whole point of Crown as a holding school is because the testimony was that performing renovations with students on site would take way too long and too much money. I remember hearing some information specifically about the impossibility of Damascus being renovated while students are still there because of the land and building.

Anyway, saving hundreds of millions of dollars and being able to have Wootton kids in a new building as a holding school or new school was the reason for this. It’s not some wE wAnT tO rUiN WoOToN wAlKeR fAmIlIes’ pRopErTy vAlUEs for funsies conspiracy. Nor is it some vast liberal conspiracy to punish wealthy Wootton families. It’s smart planning and efficient use of taxpayer dollars to try to renovate as quickly and cheaply as possible by using a holding school.


Amen!!! Word for word could have been my post. Well done!

Also - please note that just because we are not screaming at the BOE meetings or clammering for TV time does not mean that we are not emailing and filling out surveys. Fingers crossed that the BOE does what makes th emost fiscal sense and we can all celbrate with our kids at Crown!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shout out to all the Pro-H Wootton families with the courage to voice their rational opinions and who are putting in a lot of work behind the scenes. We see you, and we believe in you.


Shout out to you! I am the Cold Spring, Cabin John, Wootton parent that has been accused of being a troll so I went back to read the beginning of this thread and wanted to point out a few things.

See pages 3-6 where I participated in the beginning of this thread.

Pages 8 - 10 are not me but other Pro Option H Wootton parents that make amazing points.

I come back again on Page 69.

So whether you believe it or not ... Pro Option H Wootton parents exist and we are also being heard.


Right. How come none of you bothered to show up to the BOE meeting last week?


Just a heads up that there is more than one person responding to you. Also because as was previously stated...it is not that deep for most people.


Yeah our children’s educational future is definitely “not that deep”.


What exactly will change about your child's educational future that would be negative? All I see are positives... new AV equipment, new chem labs, new computers for AOIT, new athletic spaces....new everything!!! What is the downside from an education perspective? All the same classes, teachers etc just in a new location with better materials....genuine question


It’s the people.., their kids will have to be around Gaithersburg people.


10000000% and that is what I find so disgusting about the argument. So sad and unfortunate for the rest of the Wootton community that doe snot feel this way. We welcome the expansion of our community as long as it is near capacity and not over. The more the merrier.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I find so disheartening in this thread and the anti-H ranting is how pervasive conspiracy-theory mindsets are, and how they completely hijack discussions on the merits of an issue. Instead of focusing on the actual relevant questions, such as what does the best data show regarding enrollment projections and how can we use limited county funds to perform all the necessary renovations at the schools that need them in the fastest way possible, we have people who actually believe that BOE, Taylor & MCPS have this grand scheme to punish Wootton. Such ill motives are ascribed to elected officials and public servants with absolutely zero basis! Why would any BOE member or Taylor want to hurt a flagship school?! It’s patently absurd. Then they claim that people commenting in this very thread are out to get Wootton, as if everyone is motivated to harm one of the best schools in MD for zero reason. Make it make sense.

These conspiracy theorists need to listen to the public hearings from the Fall to see how Crown as a holding school came up back in October (not November). Taylor even talked to the press about the possibility as soon as the new declining enrollment data came out one week after options A-D were released. It was that data, in combination with the testimonies about the urgent need for renovations at Damascus and other schools, including Wootton, that forced BOE to be creative to figure out how to adjust. The whole point of Crown as a holding school is because the testimony was that performing renovations with students on site would take way too long and too much money. I remember hearing some information specifically about the impossibility of Damascus being renovated while students are still there because of the land and building.

Anyway, saving hundreds of millions of dollars and being able to have Wootton kids in a new building as a holding school or new school was the reason for this. It’s not some wE wAnT tO rUiN WoOToN wAlKeR fAmIlIes’ pRopErTy vAlUEs for funsies conspiracy. Nor is it some vast liberal conspiracy to punish wealthy Wootton families. It’s smart planning and efficient use of taxpayer dollars to try to renovate as quickly and cheaply as possible by using a holding school.


Amen!!! Word for word could have been my post. Well done!

Also - please note that just because we are not screaming at the BOE meetings or clammering for TV time does not mean that we are not emailing and filling out surveys. Fingers crossed that the BOE does what makes th emost fiscal sense and we can all celbrate with our kids at Crown!



Ummm, MCPS and BOE can't stand the concentration of high performance, which happens to be in a school that has decent Asian representation (and Jewish too). They explicitly came up with this regional model BS because they hate that concentration, blaming it on inequity instead of actually trying to teach students who are not proficient and who are predominantly black and brown.

And the shocking hate to the Wootton community specifically has been plenty obvious on this thread.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I find so disheartening in this thread and the anti-H ranting is how pervasive conspiracy-theory mindsets are, and how they completely hijack discussions on the merits of an issue. Instead of focusing on the actual relevant questions, such as what does the best data show regarding enrollment projections and how can we use limited county funds to perform all the necessary renovations at the schools that need them in the fastest way possible, we have people who actually believe that BOE, Taylor & MCPS have this grand scheme to punish Wootton. Such ill motives are ascribed to elected officials and public servants with absolutely zero basis! Why would any BOE member or Taylor want to hurt a flagship school?! It’s patently absurd. Then they claim that people commenting in this very thread are out to get Wootton, as if everyone is motivated to harm one of the best schools in MD for zero reason. Make it make sense.

These conspiracy theorists need to listen to the public hearings from the Fall to see how Crown as a holding school came up back in October (not November). Taylor even talked to the press about the possibility as soon as the new declining enrollment data came out one week after options A-D were released. It was that data, in combination with the testimonies about the urgent need for renovations at Damascus and other schools, including Wootton, that forced BOE to be creative to figure out how to adjust. The whole point of Crown as a holding school is because the testimony was that performing renovations with students on site would take way too long and too much money. I remember hearing some information specifically about the impossibility of Damascus being renovated while students are still there because of the land and building.

Anyway, saving hundreds of millions of dollars and being able to have Wootton kids in a new building as a holding school or new school was the reason for this. It’s not some wE wAnT tO rUiN WoOToN wAlKeR fAmIlIes’ pRopErTy vAlUEs for funsies conspiracy. Nor is it some vast liberal conspiracy to punish wealthy Wootton families. It’s smart planning and efficient use of taxpayer dollars to try to renovate as quickly and cheaply as possible by using a holding school.


Amen!!! Word for word could have been my post. Well done!

Also - please note that just because we are not screaming at the BOE meetings or clammering for TV time does not mean that we are not emailing and filling out surveys. Fingers crossed that the BOE does what makes th emost fiscal sense and we can all celbrate with our kids at Crown!



Ummm, MCPS and BOE can't stand the concentration of high performance, which happens to be in a school that has decent Asian representation (and Jewish too). They explicitly came up with this regional model BS because they hate that concentration, blaming it on inequity instead of actually trying to teach students who are not proficient and who are predominantly black and brown.

And the shocking hate to the Wootton community specifically has been plenty obvious on this thread.


I am not sure what hate you are referring to but as a member of the Wootton community I do not believe that to be the case. I find it unfair when we are lumped in with the other W schools as being spoiled etc when we have been in that old gross building for so long. I agree that we are not at all entitled and people outside of our community lump us in with the Whitman and Churchill's of the world without having a clue of the demographics, socioeconomics etc. I don't stand for any of that.

However, I still LOVE OPTION H!!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yep it’s overtly racist. Some even use scare quotes for the word “bussing.” Do people in our well-educated cluster really not know the history of post-Brown v Board? TL/DR: the racists didn’t want their kids bussed for integration. They didn’t want their white kids going to school with black kids. They wanted to remain segregated. School boundaries in the decades that followed were purposefully drawn so as NOT to only include geographically close neighborhoods. The whole point of integration was to intentionally create school boundaries that fostered diversity by including dissimilar and incongruous neighborhoods. And here we are in 2026 with the walkers saying Wootton should not only not expand to include more students at the new Crown, but also that some feeders should be removed from the cluster as too far away. This is all for their selfish goals - not what is best for our kids.



If you are so passionate about this why aren’t you pushing for This to happen at Whitman, which is way less diverse than Wootton. Or do you only care about it happening at Wootton and nowhere else? Why do you think that is?


I’m confused - can you be direct? I think it’s pretty clear they care about Wootton because they are probably in that cluster. What are you insinuating is the reason they don’t care about anywhere else?


Because pp gave a whole history of segregation lesson focusing on Wootton being the biggest problem with this. Yet, There are other schools within the cluster that are far less diverse. Not sure how that wasn’t clear or direct.


The issue about Crown is that they don’t want other students entering the school that they perceive as less. They use high scores as a reason but that’s not it or they would remove all the low preforming students at the school.


DP. If this is truly a move of Wootton, then no students not zoned for Wootton as the boundaries are today should attend Crown. But that isn’t what is happening. MCPS is moving the boundaries at the same time, essentially closing Wootton as it is today.

MCPS took years to perform a series of Wootton boundary studies, received significant community input, held numerous hearings over time, etc. Again, that isn’t what is happening. MCPS is trying to ramp through Option H, despite significant opposition. One has to ask - what’s the hurry?

The hurry seems to be that MCPS wants to move the Wootton students into Crown by the time it opens in the fall of 2027. That way, Crown is filled with high performing students (i.e., transplant, not organic growth) and MCPS avoids the embarrassment in using yet another brand new school building as a holding school.

MCPS had to build a school or lose the Crown land, but one has to wonder why the Crown developers offered such a valuable piece of property for free. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to determine that both MCPS and those developers were eyeing Wootton for transplant. Why else was Wootton removed from the CIP multiple times over the past several years?

MCPS can change boundaries and build new schools, but it cannot use Wootton kids as mere trading cards to cover up its incompetence and possible corruption.


This post is another level of crazy...


Nope it's very on point.

I have been on cluster committees for Wootton for years. This is exactly what has happened and going to happen.

MCPS has failed as usual.

Crown should not be Wootton nor should it be a holding school for Damascus that is stupid


You think that 20 years ago they secretly expected decreasing enrollment, maintaining a conspiracy for two decades, across several sets of county, city, and MCPS leaders, to hijack the Wootton site?

Crazy, obviously.


Nice strawman you built there. Sounds like you need to visit the Wizard of Oz before posting again.

Wootton was on the CIP multiple times in the past 20 years. It was removed from the CIP every time. Is it a coincidence that the timeframes match the Crown land grant? Are you saying no one within MCPS or the BOE ever discussed moving Wootton to the new Crown High School during that time? Is it also a coincidence that Wootton was removed from the CIP in November, and then Option H magically appeared in December? December is often when governments release future plans in the hope that citizens are so busy with the holidays to notice until its too late.


Repeat it as many times as you want. It is still an insane conspiracy theory.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yep it’s overtly racist. Some even use scare quotes for the word “bussing.” Do people in our well-educated cluster really not know the history of post-Brown v Board? TL/DR: the racists didn’t want their kids bussed for integration. They didn’t want their white kids going to school with black kids. They wanted to remain segregated. School boundaries in the decades that followed were purposefully drawn so as NOT to only include geographically close neighborhoods. The whole point of integration was to intentionally create school boundaries that fostered diversity by including dissimilar and incongruous neighborhoods. And here we are in 2026 with the walkers saying Wootton should not only not expand to include more students at the new Crown, but also that some feeders should be removed from the cluster as too far away. This is all for their selfish goals - not what is best for our kids.



If you are so passionate about this why aren’t you pushing for This to happen at Whitman, which is way less diverse than Wootton. Or do you only care about it happening at Wootton and nowhere else? Why do you think that is?


I’m confused - can you be direct? I think it’s pretty clear they care about Wootton because they are probably in that cluster. What are you insinuating is the reason they don’t care about anywhere else?


Because pp gave a whole history of segregation lesson focusing on Wootton being the biggest problem with this. Yet, There are other schools within the cluster that are far less diverse. Not sure how that wasn’t clear or direct.


The issue about Crown is that they don’t want other students entering the school that they perceive as less. They use high scores as a reason but that’s not it or they would remove all the low preforming students at the school.


DP. If this is truly a move of Wootton, then no students not zoned for Wootton as the boundaries are today should attend Crown. But that isn’t what is happening. MCPS is moving the boundaries at the same time, essentially closing Wootton as it is today.

MCPS took years to perform a series of Wootton boundary studies, received significant community input, held numerous hearings over time, etc. Again, that isn’t what is happening. MCPS is trying to ramp through Option H, despite significant opposition. One has to ask - what’s the hurry?

The hurry seems to be that MCPS wants to move the Wootton students into Crown by the time it opens in the fall of 2027. That way, Crown is filled with high performing students (i.e., transplant, not organic growth) and MCPS avoids the embarrassment in using yet another brand new school building as a holding school.

MCPS had to build a school or lose the Crown land, but one has to wonder why the Crown developers offered such a valuable piece of property for free. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to determine that both MCPS and those developers were eyeing Wootton for transplant. Why else was Wootton removed from the CIP multiple times over the past several years?

MCPS can change boundaries and build new schools, but it cannot use Wootton kids as mere trading cards to cover up its incompetence and possible corruption.


This post is another level of crazy...


Nope it's very on point.

I have been on cluster committees for Wootton for years. This is exactly what has happened and going to happen.

MCPS has failed as usual.

Crown should not be Wootton nor should it be a holding school for Damascus that is stupid


You think that 20 years ago they secretly expected decreasing enrollment, maintaining a conspiracy for two decades, across several sets of county, city, and MCPS leaders, to hijack the Wootton site?

Crazy, obviously.


Nice strawman you built there. Sounds like you need to visit the Wizard of Oz before posting again.

Wootton was on the CIP multiple times in the past 20 years. It was removed from the CIP every time. Is it a coincidence that the timeframes match the Crown land grant? Are you saying no one within MCPS or the BOE ever discussed moving Wootton to the new Crown High School during that time? Is it also a coincidence that Wootton was removed from the CIP in November, and then Option H magically appeared in December? December is often when governments release future plans in the hope that citizens are so busy with the holidays to notice until its too late.


This is right on the money.
On November 20, the removed Wootton from the CIP.
Days later, on November 24, Taylor had behind the scenes conversations with elected officials, saying there’s a proposal on the table so don’t worry about Wootton’s removal.

Then in December, right after Thanksgiving break, option H was announced.

I find it very very hard to believe Taylor dreamed up and drafted options E-H within 4 days.

The more realistic timeline is A-D was off the table (due to Churchill lawsuits). At some point, Taylor dreamed up E-H. He then removes Wootton from CIP. To make it look like the new options came out as a reaction to CIP—not as the reason for CIP removal—he announces the new options publicly in December.

Ultimately lawsuits via discovery will show whether or not option H came before and was the reason for CIP removal. If it is, MCPS is completely screwed and the neither decision will stand. They’ll have to start the boundary study all over again.

I don’t care if you are a Wootton hater or supporter—no matter who you are, you should be concerned about a corrupt non-transparent BOE and superintendent.



Are you people reading this? The above is an explosive allegation. If true—this is crazy!


It really isn't. There was no plausible path for rebuilding Wootton without using the building in Crown. And if we need to use that building, current enrollment projections don't support rushing another building.

Entirely sensible and legal. Changing facilities and changing boundaries are not the same things as closing a school under Maryland law.
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: