Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone think Rockland will reverse its mind or will the government have to step in?
The farm tried to negotiate and the Ferry refused.
They tried to buy the business from them. That's extortion. Sell to us or we shut you down.
False. They also offered to lease the land to them. White’s refused. Whites wants all the money for themselves. They didn’t even respond to various forms in contact from Rockland’s lawyers. Whites knew all along this was the path it would take.
Hi Libby! Good try. Go back in your hole.
Who is Libby?
It doesn’t matter anyway. The court sided with Rockland. The only one who lost anything here is White’s. So few people used the stupid thing (with all the waiting it was not convenient and didn’t save time) and it was constantly closed due to high water. I don’t see what the big deal is that it’s gone.
Libby is the new Rockland owner who keeps posting her side on Facebook.
There are like, 50 people on the planet who care about this. I bet more people show up to my HOA meeting than care about this.
The ferry transports 600 vehicles per day. It’s a vital conduit for rural populations on each side of the river who frequently cross for business purposes.
They can take Point of Rocks bridge.
+1 which happened often when the river flooded and the ferry was taken out of service.
Also, the “600 vehicles a day” and “vital conduit” made me laugh.