South Dakota's AG reported hitting a deer Saturday night... but actually hit & killed a man!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch the interviews. The guy is 100% transparent and sounds like an Eagle Scout. I don't think this should be politicized. He immediately gave them full access to his two phones, his car, and spoke without an attorney for two hours.

https://jalopnik.com/his-face-was-in-your-windshield-evidence-trove-release-1846346069

100 transparent, hilarious. He's working a cornpone, "Well, golly gee fellas I wish I could help ya more" angle and it starts falling apart as the interview goes on. There's no big mystery. He was surfing the Net, while driving, and he hit and killed a guy. Then he started lying to try to get out of it. It's working so far. MAGA!

No sarcasm, how do you prove he was surfing the net at the exact moment of or moment before impact? Does a 2011 Ford Taurus have features that record precise time of a crash?

And if he had so much to hide, why did a lawyer not lawyer up immediately? I thought he came across well in the interviews. You want to beat him up because he's a Republican and you're just assuming he's a liar, go ahead. I was trying to be impartial and I think he came across overly forthright.

If he was trying to be a sneak, he would have lawyered up and destroyed the phone he was surfing the net on.

Data from his phone, and also the time he called 911 at.

https://twitter.com/Ajzionts/status/1364475577156005888

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch the interviews. The guy is 100% transparent and sounds like an Eagle Scout. I don't think this should be politicized. He immediately gave them full access to his two phones, his car, and spoke without an attorney for two hours.

https://jalopnik.com/his-face-was-in-your-windshield-evidence-trove-release-1846346069

100 transparent, hilarious. He's working a cornpone, "Well, golly gee fellas I wish I could help ya more" angle and it starts falling apart as the interview goes on. There's no big mystery. He was surfing the Net, while driving, and he hit and killed a guy. Then he started lying to try to get out of it. It's working so far. MAGA!

No sarcasm, how do you prove he was surfing the net at the exact moment of or moment before impact? Does a 2011 Ford Taurus have features that record precise time of a crash?

And if he had so much to hide, why did a lawyer not lawyer up immediately? I thought he came across well in the interviews. You want to beat him up because he's a Republican and you're just assuming he's a liar, go ahead. I was trying to be impartial and I think he came across overly forthright.

If he was trying to be a sneak, he would have lawyered up and destroyed the phone he was surfing the net on.

Data from his phone, and also the time he called 911 at.

https://twitter.com/Ajzionts/status/1364475577156005888

Right wing conspiracy theories might have literally killed an innocent person.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

How did the victim's glasses end up in the atty general's car? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/south-dakota-s-legislature-is-moving-to-impeach-its-attorney-general-after-investigators-uncovered-a-hit-and-run-victim-s-glasses-in-his-car/ar-BB1e1y4I?ocid=msedgdhp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did the victim's glasses end up in the atty general's car? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/south-dakota-s-legislature-is-moving-to-impeach-its-attorney-general-after-investigators-uncovered-a-hit-and-run-victim-s-glasses-in-his-car/ar-BB1e1y4I?ocid=msedgdhp

The victim went through the windshield.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did the victim's glasses end up in the atty general's car? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/south-dakota-s-legislature-is-moving-to-impeach-its-attorney-general-after-investigators-uncovered-a-hit-and-run-victim-s-glasses-in-his-car/ar-BB1e1y4I?ocid=msedgdhp

The victim went through the windshield.

But go back a page and look at the car. The next morning, the windshield was whole. The victim did not go through the windshield.

Much more likely that Ravnsborg stopped and found the glasses on the road and picked them up and then panicked and fled the scene, going home for some mouthwash and to call in his alibi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did the victim's glasses end up in the atty general's car? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/south-dakota-s-legislature-is-moving-to-impeach-its-attorney-general-after-investigators-uncovered-a-hit-and-run-victim-s-glasses-in-his-car/ar-BB1e1y4I?ocid=msedgdhp

The victim went through the windshield.

But go back a page and look at the car. The next morning, the windshield was whole. The victim did not go through the windshield.

Much more likely that Ravnsborg stopped and found the glasses on the road and picked them up and then panicked and fled the scene, going home for some mouthwash and to call in his alibi.

Dude. Just looked at the pics. Np here.

There is a giant hole in the windshield on the left hand side.

The victim totally had his face in the windshield.

[Anonymous]

You can watch video hours of this guy talking to the cops. Shannon Watts (head of Moms Demand Action) links on her twitter. It is crazy.

He is clearly surfing the web, They can show he is clicking on stories. Then 60 seconds later calls 911. The cop is like, how do you have time to put your phone down, hit someone, pull over, get your bearings, call 911. I mean CLEARLY he was on the phone during the crash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You can watch video hours of this guy talking to the cops. Shannon Watts (head of Moms Demand Action) links on her twitter. It is crazy.

He is clearly surfing the web, They can show he is clicking on stories. Then 60 seconds later calls 911. The cop is like, how do you have time to put your phone down, hit someone, pull over, get your bearings, call 911. I mean CLEARLY he was on the phone during the crash.

We can assume, but you can not prove it. Unless the car had a black box and 4G wireless security monitoring that recorded the crash time down to the millisecond. But I doubt a 2011 Ford Taurus is that sophisticated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did the victim's glasses end up in the atty general's car? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/south-dakota-s-legislature-is-moving-to-impeach-its-attorney-general-after-investigators-uncovered-a-hit-and-run-victim-s-glasses-in-his-car/ar-BB1e1y4I?ocid=msedgdhp

The victim went through the windshield.

But go back a page and look at the car. The next morning, the windshield was whole. The victim did not go through the windshield.

Much more likely that Ravnsborg stopped and found the glasses on the road and picked them up and then panicked and fled the scene, going home for some mouthwash and to call in his alibi.

You're being ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Did they run a toxicology report on the victim? He had just crashed his truck, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did they run a toxicology report on the victim? He had just crashed his truck, right?

this thread isn't about the victim, though

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did they run a toxicology report on the victim? He had just crashed his truck, right?

Walking while drunk isn't a crime (if that's what he was doing). Nor is it a death sentence. Nor does anyone believe that he wandered into the road in front of Ravsborg's car.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did they run a toxicology report on the victim? He had just crashed his truck, right?

It doesn't even matter if the victim was drunk/high, because he was on the side of the road. Ravnsborg drove out of his lane, drove onto the shoulder of the road, and hit the guy.

They were able to recreate the exact impact site based on tire marks and where bone & flesh fragments were located on the ground.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can watch video hours of this guy talking to the cops. Shannon Watts (head of Moms Demand Action) links on her twitter. It is crazy.

He is clearly surfing the web, They can show he is clicking on stories. Then 60 seconds later calls 911. The cop is like, how do you have time to put your phone down, hit someone, pull over, get your bearings, call 911. I mean CLEARLY he was on the phone during the crash.

We can assume, but you can not prove it. Unless the car had a black box and 4G wireless security monitoring that recorded the crash time down to the millisecond. But I doubt a 2011 Ford Taurus is that sophisticated.

He was playing on his phone This is vehicular manslaughter