76/95 VA counties declare 2A sanctuaries

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have to be paid trolls in this thread. To discredit the gun control people.

I’m very pro gun control but this is insane.

Well they aren't doing a good job. They did however show us their true colors, with the quick reaction to threats of violence. Seriously murdered by SWAT teams, prison rape, these sickos have their fantasies.

Haha. Project much?

Uh No. Disgusted much.

Yes. I am very much disgusted by you.

Yes you've made that clear, that not only do you hate the fringe of crazy gun owners, you hate the average ones too, heck you hate anyone who won't fall 100% into line with your extreme views. And to top it off, disagreement wasn't enough for you, neither was name calling. You had to say some truly sick shit, but I guess thats what gets you off these days.

You are confusing posters. I didn’t call you names of say “sick shit”.

Or perhaps you are just projecting again.

What am I projecting, do tell?

[Anonymous]

Everyone on this thread posting from Russia...raise your hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WOW is this one hostile thread. Maybe it would be helpful to read the actual legal opinion, which is short and very straightforward. The actual question that the AG addressed was about plain local government authority VS state government authority. Policy disputes weren't even mentioned, and the official opinion looked at the actual "gun sanctuary" language itself. The language in the bulk of these local "gun sanctuary" laws doesn't say anything except "We the people of Buccamuc County hereby declare that guns are terrific" or something like that. The laws typically do NOT actually state what anybody has a right to do, nor do they say what the local county supervisors is NOT allowed to legislate. And there's no question - Dillon Rule or not - a local government CANNOT legislate contrary to state law, period.

This is not hard to understand.

Here is the actual opinion: https://www.oag.state.va.us/files/Opinions/2019/19-059-Jones-issued.pdf

However localities can refuse to enforce unfunded mandates from state governments. There's quite a bit of case law about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone on this thread posting from Russia...raise your hands.

I don't think anyone is, all of these opinions in this thread common in NOVA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have to be paid trolls in this thread. To discredit the gun control people.

I’m very pro gun control but this is insane.

Well they aren't doing a good job. They did however show us their true colors, with the quick reaction to threats of violence. Seriously murdered by SWAT teams, prison rape, these sickos have their fantasies.

Haha. Project much?

Uh No. Disgusted much.

Yes. I am very much disgusted by you.

Yes you've made that clear, that not only do you hate the fringe of crazy gun owners, you hate the average ones too, heck you hate anyone who won't fall 100% into line with your extreme views. And to top it off, disagreement wasn't enough for you, neither was name calling. You had to say some truly sick shit, but I guess thats what gets you off these days.

You are confusing posters. I didn’t call you names of say “sick shit”.

Or perhaps you are just projecting again.

What am I projecting, do tell?

Name calling and sick fantasies. Are you one of the posters aching for someone to come and try to take your gun?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Do you support the common-sense legislation supported by the Brady campaign?
https://www.bradyunited.org/legislation

Well, the problem is that most of the "common sense legislation supported by the Brady campaign" doesn't contain a lot of common sense or is just plain wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WOW is this one hostile thread. Maybe it would be helpful to read the actual legal opinion, which is short and very straightforward. The actual question that the AG addressed was about plain local government authority VS state government authority. Policy disputes weren't even mentioned, and the official opinion looked at the actual "gun sanctuary" language itself. The language in the bulk of these local "gun sanctuary" laws doesn't say anything except "We the people of Buccamuc County hereby declare that guns are terrific" or something like that. The laws typically do NOT actually state what anybody has a right to do, nor do they say what the local county supervisors is NOT allowed to legislate. And there's no question - Dillon Rule or not - a local government CANNOT legislate contrary to state law, period.

This is not hard to understand.

Here is the actual opinion: https://www.oag.state.va.us/files/Opinions/2019/19-059-Jones-issued.pdf

However localities can refuse to enforce unfunded mandates from state governments. There's quite a bit of case law about this.

True if the unfunded mandate relates to a Constitutionally imposed affirmative requirement. In other cases, they cannot refuse, sometimes even in a Cooley Rule state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Do you support the common-sense legislation supported by the Brady campaign?
https://www.bradyunited.org/legislation

Well, the problem is that most of the "common sense legislation supported by the Brady campaign" doesn't contain a lot of common sense or is just plain wrong.

What is wrong with any of the proposed legislation on that link?

[Anonymous]

#edsmanifesto

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have to be paid trolls in this thread. To discredit the gun control people.

I’m very pro gun control but this is insane.

Well they aren't doing a good job. They did however show us their true colors, with the quick reaction to threats of violence. Seriously murdered by SWAT teams, prison rape, these sickos have their fantasies.

Haha. Project much?

Uh No. Disgusted much.

Yes. I am very much disgusted by you.

Yes you've made that clear, that not only do you hate the fringe of crazy gun owners, you hate the average ones too, heck you hate anyone who won't fall 100% into line with your extreme views. And to top it off, disagreement wasn't enough for you, neither was name calling. You had to say some truly sick shit, but I guess thats what gets you off these days.

You are confusing posters. I didn’t call you names of say “sick shit”.

Or perhaps you are just projecting again.

What am I projecting, do tell?

Name calling and sick fantasies. Are you one of the posters aching for someone to come and try to take your gun?

Only sick fantasies in this thread were thrown around buy the antigunners... Please show evidence of the contrary.

[Anonymous]

Good turnout today at the Dale City gun show. As always, there is a very diverse group of people there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Do you support the common-sense legislation supported by the Brady campaign?
https://www.bradyunited.org/legislation

Well, the problem is that most of the "common sense legislation supported by the Brady campaign" doesn't contain a lot of common sense or is just plain wrong.

What is wrong with any of the proposed legislation on that link?

DP: I already outlined at least two issues. See my previous post you apparently ignored.

[Anonymous]

To the person wanting to do away with all private gun ownership: Since you feel so strongly, why don't you start an organization to do this proper way set forth in the Constitution to eliminate the second amendment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Do you support the common-sense legislation supported by the Brady campaign?
https://www.bradyunited.org/legislation

Well, the problem is that most of the "common sense legislation supported by the Brady campaign" doesn't contain a lot of common sense or is just plain wrong.

What is wrong with any of the proposed legislation on that link?

DP: I already outlined at least two issues. See my previous post you apparently ignored.

Timestamp?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have to be paid trolls in this thread. To discredit the gun control people.

I’m very pro gun control but this is insane.

Well they aren't doing a good job. They did however show us their true colors, with the quick reaction to threats of violence. Seriously murdered by SWAT teams, prison rape, these sickos have their fantasies.

Haha. Project much?

Uh No. Disgusted much.

Yes. I am very much disgusted by you.

Yes you've made that clear, that not only do you hate the fringe of crazy gun owners, you hate the average ones too, heck you hate anyone who won't fall 100% into line with your extreme views. And to top it off, disagreement wasn't enough for you, neither was name calling. You had to say some truly sick shit, but I guess thats what gets you off these days.

You are confusing posters. I didn’t call you names of say “sick shit”.

Or perhaps you are just projecting again.

What am I projecting, do tell?

Name calling and sick fantasies. Are you one of the posters aching for someone to come and try to take your gun?

Only sick fantasies in this thread were thrown around buy the antigunners... Please show evidence of the contrary.

Ok, “sicko”.