Why PP? It sounds dismal and sad. |
|
I started out in small newspapers a few decades ago. PP is right: the pay is abysmal, but in my experience there was a lot of camaraderie in the staff and freedom to do what you want.
Fast forward to today, there are still some small papers left, but in the real world I don't think there are any Stars Hollows. I'm still a journalist, but for a specialized newspaper, where the pay is better (but not great), and I feel I'm learning new things every day...and even got to meet Lauren Graham last month at press event! |
Not to me, obviously.
|
Well, you can be a functioning alcoholic almost anywhere doing anything. I wouldn't waste the time and money on a degree in journalism to achieve this goal. I've known many people who worked for small papers during the 80s through today--one even ended up at the Globe and some still work as journalists for papers although they are mostly online. However, drinking at your desk and/or during the day was never part of the culture. If you're just looking to work in a small town and be your own boss, consider something practical--dog groomer, plumber. Journalists like actors need to supplement their incomes unless they hit the big time. |
I agree with a lot of the above. I loved just seeing the characters again and their interactions. Was it perfect, no, but it was enjoyable. I think it hit many true notes. A lot of moms who have kids young consider having kids again late in life, especially if they are married to someone else. And for some of them, their kids end up pregnant and then they opt just to be happy being a grandma instead. That's likely what would happen with Lorelai now that Rory's pregnant. I think the reboot was a great mix of each character growing up a bit/maturing and still being true to the characters we loved. Lorelai working out so she can eat ice cream and fit into her wedding dress? Totally believable - she's never not going to eat ice cream, so she does what it takes to do that and fit in the dress. Just like she did when she left home because she wanted to live her life a certain way and ended up being a single mom living in a shack cleaning rooms. She could have stayed with her parents and lived a much easier life, but it wasn't what she wanted. I also think the reason Luke and Lorelai didn't talk about having kids earlier is because they were just happy to be together - they knew they came close to not being together. And so while Luke wanted kids, he didn't push it because what he wanted most was Lorelai. When Lorelai then pursues surrogacy and getting married, it's showing that she's finally growing up and putting Luke first. And she's getting married because she no longer is rejecting the life her parents wanted for her - she's lost her dad and she's not rebelling. Rory finds herself at a crossroads in her career. It's not turning out how she wanted and she could have taken the teaching job, but it's not what she wanted. I don't think she thought it was beneath her - it just wasn't what she wanted, and she wasn't at a point where she had to give up her dream of being a writer. Though, I would bet if there were a spinoff, she would be a single mom raising her daughter (because you know it would have to be a girl) and working at Chilton. She would likely choose this road now that she's pregnant because she's finally at the point where she has to do what it takes because she's having a baby. It's clear she won't be relying on Logan or her dad, as evidenced by her conversation with Christopher. She's making choices and growing up a bit. (And part of me really wants them to make a spinoff.) I loved what they did with Emily. I saw her as welcoming her maid's family into the house in part because she was lonely and in part because she was used to having someone to take care of. And when she moved and took the job at the museum, it wasn't a rejection of her old life, but choosing something new for herself. She was never going to want to try to have the same life as she had with Richard - it would have been impossible because no one could replace Richard for her and his death changed her. I liked seeing all of the other characters. I would have liked to see more of them, but, really, we were just supposed to be getting glimpses because they were all bit players and this was supposed to be about the Gilmore Girls. One last thing - I think Logan and Rory will always love each other, as a parallel to Lorelai and Christopher always loving each other, but not being right for each other. That's why Logan is marrying his fiancée. Because he accepted that Rory turned him down, but moved on with the life he was supposed to lead according to his family. Seeing Rory on the side is his rebelling. But a lot of rich trust fund kids do this - marry and live the life they're supposed to according to their families in order to get all of the trappings promised to them, and then having affairs for themselves. It's a perfect foil to further cement what Lorelai rejected and that Rory rejects the mistress role Logan wants for her also. |
Hmmm PP. I hated the reunion/reboot or whatever they are calling it, but reading what you wrote makes sense. I like your perspective. A lot! |
*I can't imagine you know a lot of rich, trust fund kids. Rory is a trust fund kid also. Richard's mother left her a mint: Richard mentions Rory receiving her trust fund in season 6 when she's 25 http://gilmoregirls.wikia.com/wiki/Lorelai_%22Trix%22_Gilmore So why Rory was couch surfing and crying about being poor is a mystery, and again just show how insipid the reboot was. |
| I really disliked the first three episodes, felt very disappointed by how flat and unconvincing the reboot felt (other than Kelly Bishop's wonderful arc). But it started to come to life for me in the 4th episode. Lorelai was great in the last one imo, her phone call to her mom and speech to Luke. The writing was zippy and fun like the old days, too. I liked the Logan/Christopher, Luke/Jess parallel, and the idea of coming full circle. Normally, I'd be clamoring for a spin-off, but Alexis Bledel is such a deadly-dull actress, I couldn't stand it. Stars Hollow as a kind of Mayberry completely out of touch with the hard, complicated world we live in now no longer feels plausible either. |
Comments are in bolded italics above. |
| I remember that it wasn't for sure she was going to get the trust fund. Even if it was, if any of this trust fund stuff was relevant, it should have been explicitly stated in AYITL. |
But she wasn't making it on her own. She snubbed paying jobs for the paper one, which had no salary. It doesn't matter if she was as Rich as the Huntzburgers, it's been obvious that the Gilmores were loaded and she and her mom were to inherit big bucks. |
That scene was the best of the entire 4 shows. |
|
Ok, so I'm a little late here. I've been "saving" the show to watch with my newborn and I just finished it at our 2am feeding last night.
Full disclosure: I didn't watch all of Gilmore Girls. I made it about halfway through before Lorelei became sufferable and I had to quit. BUT...I actually liked the revival MUCH more than I liked any of the show! I didn't think it was bad at all. But also, I was watching it in the middle of the night and may have been delusional. I liked the Rory was unsuccessful. That seemed true to life for me. I hated how Rory got everything. I think successful girls fail all the time. A few questions for you true fans: -what was with the musicals?!? -what with the gay pride parade mention at the town hall? Seemed like SUCH a non sequitur. -why the Wild story line? |