I'll be impressed when he adopts the Flying Spaghetti Monster as his personal lord and savior. [eye roll at this thread and everyone in it] |
Rolling your eyes at yourself - how interesting. |
Nice, but your last sentence indicates that you're limiting your concept of how to live with less hate and arguing to people who believe in a Christian God. Did you mean to exclude non-christians and non-religious people? |
![]() |
My point was that most believers criticizing Catholics are ironically other Christians and I was theorizing that it's because Catholicism has enough overlap that a fellow Christian can say 'Yeah, I agreed with you all the way up until THIS point and then you lost me.' because they have enough background to understand the basic beliefs of Christianity. Whereas Christians don't regularly criticize, for example, Orthodox Jews or Muslims in part because they don't have as much shared reference to begin with. It's almost like the other religions are so foreign that they cannot begin to mount a fully developed critique. |
Actually, I'm a second poster who feels bad for OP's husband. I'm not Catholic and I'm not tempted to become Catholic - but OP's spite is pretty sad. |
still not "everyone" and possibly not even a second poster, which only the moderator knows, by checking the unique IP address that accompanies each post. |
Nope, you've out of line for quite some time. You've been snarky and disrespectful of several religions, even as you preen and pat yourself on the back about your "small c" catholicism. Also, your debating tactics are the pits: you consistently go straight for ad hominems (see your post above!) and you've blatently twisted what other posters said. I don't have time to go back and collect a full inventory of your out of line snark (and several PPs besides me have agreed you're nasty) and your sleazy debating tactics, but here are a few things that come to mind. Ranting a few days ago about how the proliferation of US churches is "crazy" (your words) even as you boast above about creating your own version of Christianity (nonsensical, but whatever). Arguing that the Episcopal church has nothing more to offer than an annulment to Henry VII, as you ignore the posts about all the contemporary (Henry's time) debates about obeisance to Rome. I frankly doubt you are who you say you are. Also, I too noticed the rude and snarky (just like you!) poster on the Older Chldren forum, lecturing to the rest of us about how Germany in your day allowed kids aged 16 to drink , just a few hours after you said were German here. Grow up. |
You've GOT to be kidding. You really believe that only ONE poster finds you offensive? |
Thus Sayeth a Loving Christian |
Meh, Christians are supposed to tell the truth. Telling the truth doesn't conflict with the commandment to turn the other cheek. And there's nothing unloving about collecting that German PP's own posts and holding them up to a mirror, so she can see the truth about how she's behaving. Whatever that German poster's religion, it obviously doesn't include peace and love. Ugh. |
That attitude fits right in on DCUM. Have you seen this? http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/quote/0/5313719.page It was spot on.
Too many people here on DCUM have adopted the attitude that 99.9% of educated DC Metro residents (or Americans or humanity) thinks how I do, so if more than one posts disagrees, it must be one person +1ing themselves. |
Whooosh..... That's the sound of the irony going right over your head. You obviously believe that it's impossible for more than one person to disagree with you! |
English wasn't your best course in school. Try re-reading what was written in italics. Maybe aloud. Also, check out the definition of irony. You don't know how to use the word correctly. |
not pp. Eh, being Christian doesn't mean we don't struggle to love our fellow man, you know. |