No, I dont want to date women in their 40's

[Anonymous]

Women, especially the uber-educated East Coast liberal types, think nature has given them a raw deal b/c it won't wait for them to establish their career. Meanwhile, guys can pretty much do what they want for as long as they want and there will always be some piece of nookie out there for them.

[Anonymous]

Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

[Anonymous]

Two dear friends in their 40's just met wonderful men of the same age. They've had no problem meeting and attracting men. Both happen to be beautiful and kind, and all natural - but both are over 43.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

Where do you get this crap? I hope women aren't reading this stuff and taking it to heart.
I would never date anyone who had this attitude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

Where do you get this crap? I hope women aren't reading this stuff and taking it to heart.
I would never date anyone who had this attitude.

It is no secret that men don't want to wife up sluts.

Was is that a surprise?

There are plenty of studies that show correlation between number of sexual partners of a woman and divorce rates.

It is also believed as well that higher numbers of sex partners diminish oxytocin responses, i.e. makes it harder for women to bond closely to their mates.

Increased partner counts also lead to higher incidences of HPV and cervical cancer as well as other STDS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

Where do you get this crap? I hope women aren't reading this stuff and taking it to heart.
I would never date anyone who had this attitude.

It is no secret that men don't want to wife up sluts.

Was is that a surprise?

There are plenty of studies that show correlation between number of sexual partners of a woman and divorce rates.

It is also believed as well that higher numbers of sex partners diminish oxytocin responses, i.e. makes it harder for women to bond closely to their mates.

Increased partner counts also lead to higher incidences of HPV and cervical cancer as well as other STDS.

And what about all the man sluts out there? When a man makes this remark, it makes him sound gay because if you expect a 'chaste' woman but aren't yourself, you must have been fucking men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

Where do you get this crap? I hope women aren't reading this stuff and taking it to heart.
I would never date anyone who had this attitude.

It is no secret that men don't want to wife up sluts.

Was is that a surprise?

There are plenty of studies that show correlation between number of sexual partners of a woman and divorce rates.

It is also believed as well that higher numbers of sex partners diminish oxytocin responses, i.e. makes it harder for women to bond closely to their mates.

Increased partner counts also lead to higher incidences of HPV and cervical cancer as well as other STDS.

And what about all the man sluts out there? When a man makes this remark, it makes him sound gay because if you expect a 'chaste' woman but aren't yourself, you must have been fucking men.

I mean, its just true. Even for guys that have had a good amount of sexual experience, they still don't want to wife a slut. The old saying ' you can't make a ho into a housewife' is cliche for a reason.

yes it is a double standard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is no secret that men don't want to wife up sluts.

Speak for yourself moron. I'm a guy, and I'd much prefer a "slut" (sexually experienced, aggressive and self-confident) woman over a prude any day of the week. I've had both, and the sluts are way better in bed. If I'm going to be sexually exclusive for the rest of my life, she better like sex, and better like it a little freaky.

More on point: if she's in her 40s and isn't very sexual or experienced, the alarm bells are really gonna go off.

Between marriages I dated a few who were very experienced and a few who weren't or were kind of prudish - the latter were far in a way the worst in terms of physical intimacy and their "chasteness" was really a reflection of serious hangups about emotional and/or physical intimacy.

You're an idiot, though, with lots of obvious hangups of your own - so maybe they're perfect for you. Clearly you feel grossly inadequate and can't handle any competition. You'd probably be better off with a lights-out-think-of-england woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

Where do you get this crap? I hope women aren't reading this stuff and taking it to heart.
I would never date anyone who had this attitude.

It is no secret that men don't want to wife up sluts.

Was is that a surprise?

There are plenty of studies that show correlation between number of sexual partners of a woman and divorce rates.

It is also believed as well that higher numbers of sex partners diminish oxytocin responses, i.e. makes it harder for women to bond closely to their mates.

Increased partner counts also lead to higher incidences of HPV and cervical cancer as well as other STDS.

And what about all the man sluts out there? When a man makes this remark, it makes him sound gay because if you expect a 'chaste' woman but aren't yourself, you must have been fucking men.

I mean, its just true. Even for guys that have had a good amount of sexual experience, they still don't want to wife a slut. The old saying ' you can't make a ho into a housewife' is cliche for a reason.

yes it is a double standard.

You should read the guys complaining about their wives who don't like anything other than extremely basic sex, and only occasionally.

Your theory does not hold in practice, in my opinion. Rock on with your 1950 ideas, though!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

Where do you get this crap? I hope women aren't reading this stuff and taking it to heart.
I would never date anyone who had this attitude.

It is no secret that men don't want to wife up sluts.

Was is that a surprise?

There are plenty of studies that show correlation between number of sexual partners of a woman and divorce rates.

It is also believed as well that higher numbers of sex partners diminish oxytocin responses, i.e. makes it harder for women to bond closely to their mates.

Increased partner counts also lead to higher incidences of HPV and cervical cancer as well as other STDS.

This made me laugh. There are no such studies. If there are it's from fanatical Christian misogynists. STDs are a concern for both men and women but number of partners is irrelevant. Sheesh... Welcome to 2013, not 1950.

[Anonymous]

This is a false dichotomy. You don't have to chose between slut and prude.

A low partner count woman can be sexually adventurous and exciting.

No one can say with a straight face that all other things equal men wouldn't prefer a 25 year old woman with a 5 count vs 50 when considering wife material.

To argue otherwise is simply being difficult on purpose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

Where do you get this crap? I hope women aren't reading this stuff and taking it to heart.
I would never date anyone who had this attitude.

It is no secret that men don't want to wife up sluts.

Was is that a surprise?

There are plenty of studies that show correlation between number of sexual partners of a woman and divorce rates.

It is also believed as well that higher numbers of sex partners diminish oxytocin responses, i.e. makes it harder for women to bond closely to their mates.

Increased partner counts also lead to higher incidences of HPV and cervical cancer as well as other STDS.

This made me laugh. There are no such studies. If there are it's from fanatical Christian misogynists. STDs are a concern for both men and women but number of partners is irrelevant. Sheesh... Welcome to 2013, not 1950.

If a woman had one partner her risk of std is lower than a woman with ten.

That's just basic understanding. To say that partner count is irrelevant for std risk is ridiculous on its face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

A low partner count woman can be sexually adventurous and exciting.

But, how do you know if she has a low partner count because she has serious sexual hang ups? If a woman likes sex and is adventurous, her partner count is likely to be higher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the women in DC seem to have unrealistic expectation. I know a few friends who will not settle for anything less than a guy who is x religion, a lawyer, a doctor or a high profile x, make x plus dollars, had to graduate from one of three schools and are between x-y years old. Objectively, they are average to a little below average in looks and smarts and some are not nice. They are in their 40 now and will ask why they can't get a man. I don't say anything, what can you say?

and have probably many sexual partners.

if you want the cream of the crop you have to be the cream of the crop and that involves being relatively chaste

Where do you get this crap? I hope women aren't reading this stuff and taking it to heart.
I would never date anyone who had this attitude.

It is no secret that men don't want to wife up sluts.

Was is that a surprise?

There are plenty of studies that show correlation between number of sexual partners of a woman and divorce rates.

It is also believed as well that higher numbers of sex partners diminish oxytocin responses, i.e. makes it harder for women to bond closely to their mates.

Increased partner counts also lead to higher incidences of HPV and cervical cancer as well as other STDS.

This made me laugh. There are no such studies. If there are it's from fanatical Christian misogynists. STDs are a concern for both men and women but number of partners is irrelevant. Sheesh... Welcome to 2013, not 1950.

there are studies showing that men prefer more partners than women, and that men prefer (female) partners with less sexual experience than women do.

that said, differences, while notable, are not outrageous. it's the same thing as with age, looks, money, long-term commitment etc. etc. differences between men and women are real and important, but to say that men want virgins and women find 50 yo men attractive is just ludicrous.