Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is that why there is suddenly a whole new thread about this case when there was a huge one already?
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/319541.page
Because this case was on Dr. Phil?

The writing idiosyncrasies indicate that it's one person who keeps posting new threads (and makes most of the emotional comments), with some personal vendetta against adoption, as well as facts in this case. I think there's something deeper in their personal lives that they're dealing poorly with.

Just asked Jeff to check in on the sock puppeting by this poster.

[Anonymous]

Whats sick is that they get away with it. Big bucks and politics are involved. There are so many shady agencies and attorneys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is that why there is suddenly a whole new thread about this case when there was a huge one already?
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/319541.page
Because this case was on Dr. Phil?

The writing idiosyncrasies indicate that it's one person who keeps posting new threads (and makes most of the emotional comments), with some personal vendetta against adoption, as well as facts in this case. I think there's something deeper in their personal lives that they're dealing poorly with.

Just asked Jeff to check in on the sock puppeting by this poster.

Which poster? I'm the one in your last quote - I've not done any sockpuppeting!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:www.babyemmawyatt.com

There are many cases like this (Utah being the biggest offende). Terry Achane was another-the adoptive parents in his case decided to give up and he regained custody. His case was actually in South Carolina. Perhaps South Carolina will follow in Utah's footsteps.

Yes read of this case before -- it is horrid
some people are sick
as a biological parent and as a parent who has considered adoption and have adopted kids in my extended family
baby stealing is beyond disturbing and sick

You can't steal what isn't yours. Once he signed the papers terminating his parental rights, his ability to have a say in anything related to Veronica ended. If he wanted her, he shouldn't have signed the papers.

[Anonymous]

John Wyatt never signed anything-his child was taken to Utah without his consent and the attoneys, birth mom and adoption agency orchestrated the transaction so he would not be able to exercise his rights. Something similar happened in the Veronica case....he signed custody over to the mother, not a termination of his rights. He was about to deploy to Iraq for a year and signed so mother could care for his child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is important here is what is in the best interest of the CHILD, not the adults involved, who have their own agendas or points to make. And that is clearly placing her back with her adoptive parents, where she lived happily for most of her life.

she spent 27 months with one (because they delayed things for 23)
and 19 months with the other party(who is going to delay things also)

she has not spent MOST of her life with either party

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You can't steal what isn't yours. Once he signed the papers terminating his parental rights, his ability to have a say in anything related to Veronica ended. If he wanted her, he shouldn't have signed the papers.

In your mind
What matters is the legal definition of it. In Oklahoma you have a revocation period. He signed and talked to attorneys at military and did all the necessary paperwork to inform all the needed parties. So legally that does not count according to Oklahoma law.
Law in Sourth Carolina is different. There the opinion of the father is not really even needed. The attorney got the parents the permission to take the kid to South Carolina by misspelling her name and listing the kid as hispanic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:www.babyemmawyatt.com

There are many cases like this (Utah being the biggest offende). Terry Achane was another-the adoptive parents in his case decided to give up and he regained custody. His case was actually in South Carolina. Perhaps South Carolina will follow in Utah's footsteps.

Yes read of this case before -- it is horrid
some people are sick
as a biological parent and as a parent who has considered adoption and have adopted kids in my extended family
baby stealing is beyond disturbing and sick

You can't steal what isn't yours. Once he signed the papers terminating his parental rights, his ability to have a say in anything related to Veronica ended. If he wanted her, he shouldn't have signed the papers.

You can only steal what isn't yours. I'm not sure I get your point.

[Anonymous]

Read somewhere that the adoptive mother is bi-polar. Perhaps that explains some of her twisted behavior regarding this case. Most people would hve mourned the disrupted adoption 4 months in and given the baby back. Actually, I hope they would not have engaged in the fraud surrounding this adoption in the first place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Read somewhere that the adoptive mother is bi-polar. Perhaps that explains some of her twisted behavior regarding this case. Most people would hve mourned the disrupted adoption 4 months in and given the baby back. Actually, I hope they would not have engaged in the fraud surrounding this adoption in the first place.

There was not fraud. But keep telling yourself that. It seems to keep you wound up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:www.babyemmawyatt.com

There are many cases like this (Utah being the biggest offende). Terry Achane was another-the adoptive parents in his case decided to give up and he regained custody. His case was actually in South Carolina. Perhaps South Carolina will follow in Utah's footsteps.

These are so sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is important here is what is in the best interest of the CHILD, not the adults involved, who have their own agendas or points to make. And that is clearly placing her back with her adoptive parents, where she lived happily for most of her life.

she probably does not even remember the Capobiancos. Is it really about her they are thinking of? She has now grandparents, a sister, a dad, a mom with the Brown family as well.

The point is, she never should have been taken away in the first place.

No, the point is they should have never tried to adopt a kid not available for adoption.

[Anonymous]

The case was going to be heard again in SC and there were accusations made against the adoptive parents regarding "extrinsic fraud"...They apparently got scared so are now having bio dad arrested for custodial interference-all while he is away on mandatory military training. Ther is a warrant and he is going to be arrested today.

So not only do these AP's want to take his kid, but destroy his life and career in the process.

Adoptive mother has a high position in a mental health type agency (mst services), which has a large contract with the military providing services to families. She also knows many of the SC family court judges as the clients her agency serves are frequently before the family court. Her agency mostly funded by medicaid. Adoptive mother uses her maiden name of Duncan for her business.

SC seems to have a vested interest in protecting this adoptive couple, and are not following the law in doing so.

[Anonymous]

So Brown is going to be arrested and let out on bail, he can fight extradition, and in a case this minor, this can take time, he can plead innocent and fight the charge
Will he ever get convicted?
Adoption is a 13 billion dollar business. South Carolina does not want fathers stopping any adoption. There is a lot of money exchanging hands

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The case was going to be heard again in SC and there were accusations made against the adoptive parents regarding "extrinsic fraud"...They apparently got scared so are now having bio dad arrested for custodial interference-all while he is away on mandatory military training. Ther is a warrant and he is going to be arrested today.

So not only do these AP's want to take his kid, but destroy his life and career in the process.

Adoptive mother has a high position in a mental health type agency (mst services), which has a large contract with the military providing services to families. She also knows many of the SC family court judges as the clients her agency serves are frequently before the family court. Her agency mostly funded by medicaid. Adoptive mother uses her maiden name of Duncan for her business.

SC seems to have a vested interest in protecting this adoptive couple, and are not following the law in doing so.

Oh, so accusations are the same as fact now? No, no court has ever found this couple guilty of fraud, even though you repeatedly act as if that is the case.

If he is arrested, it will be because he has failed to comply with a court ordered visit with the adoptive parents. They are not destroying his life and career. He is the scofflaw here, not them.

And finally, the adoptive mother was picking up double shifts at the casino where she worked when she was several months pregnant because the "father" refused to support his child. I highly doubt that she now has a "high position" in an mental health agency.