Forum Index
»
Pets
There also used to be way fewer people with such significant anxiety and hatred of dogs. |
Numerous trails, parks, and stores are literally “dog-friendly,” but you’re trying to be a pedantic idiot. |
These are laws that allow dogs, it doesn't make the place dog-friendly. The laws are saying "you MAY bring your dog here, but only if the dog doesn't bother people." It's like how there are lots of place kids are allowed but are not "kid-friendly" places. Restaurants and airplanes, for instance. You can bring kids there, but if your kid is running around, bothering other people, screaming, etc, then you will be asked to leave or you might be banned from the airline or. held accountable for your kids' behavior in other ways. A "kid-friendly" place is a playground, a school, a kid's birthday party, a family restaurant, Chuck-e-Cheese, etc. Places where kids can run amok and no one cares. |
Lmao you need to visit California or Colorado. Entire, unfenced parks with hiking trails permit off-leash dogs. Actually, the same is true in Old Town. A dog park right on the Potomac in Old Town has no fence and no leashes required. Sorry that the world doesn’t exist the way you want it to. |
Honey, these places are literally listed on the county website as “dog-friendly” places. |
| Back to the original post, I started yelling NOT FRIENDLY NOT FRIENDLY. I use it for sketchy rescue dogs who I can't trust yet and people end up so startled they move away. I don't have the bandwidth or desire to try to teach people how to exercise common sense or manners anymore. |
Unsurprised you don't know what pedantic means since you also can't read. I specifically said that a dog park or a store that welcomes dogs is an example of a "dog-friendly" place. A sidewalk is not dog friendly, it's a utilitarian public space designed for humans where dogs are merely permitted (but are actually fairly restricted -- they must be leashed and controlled according to laws). Perhaps there are dog-friendly trails on private property, but public trails are like sidewalks -- dogs might be allowed but they will be required to be leashed and controlled as they would be on a sidewalk, because a public trail is a public good intended for the use of humans and unleashed and uncontrolled dogs will inhibit the ability of people to use trails. Many public trails don't allow dogs at all for this reason. You called a sidewalk or trail a "dog friendly" place. It is not. It's a place where dogs are tolerated IF they behave according to laws and restrictions. If you don't understand this, you shouldn't even have a dog. |
People have lost their minds. Dogs should not be jumping on people as you walk by them or if you stop to talk to your neighbors. Only in our unrestrained dog culture is this entertained. Control your dogs, people. |
Yes, parks where dogs are free to run around and are encouraged to congregate. There is no such thing as a "dog friendly sidewalk." Dogs must be controlled on sidewalks. Always. HONEY. |
THE SIDEWALK IS NOT A DOG PARK YOU INSUFFERABLE IDIOTS. -- Colorado native |
I don’t know what “pedantic” means? You’re trying to create some non existent distinction between “dogs allowed” and “dog friendly” when there isn’t one except in your head. |
Are sidewalks human friendly? Humans still have to behave on sidewalks. You’re absolutely insufferable. Leashed dogs are allowed to be on sidewalks. And they’re allowed to exhibit normal, safe behavior on sidewalks. |
You definitely do not know what pedantic is, it's just an insult you hurl at someone who talks sense while you are talking nonsense. Sidewalks are not dog-friendly. Ever. There is no such thing as a dog-friendly sidewalk. This is not pedantry, it's facts. |
So, to be clear, you’re good with urban, unfenced parks bordering crowded sidewalks allowing off-leash dogs? Because that’s how things are in San Francisco. |
I don't know if anyone has explained this to you yet, but dogs and humans are different. |