Forum Index
»
Pets
Putting your hand on someone’s shoulder isn’t assault or battery unless there’s an intent to cause harm or offense or imminent fear of harm or offense. The standard for offense is the reasonable person standard. So a security guard putting their hand on your shoulder and saying, “Ma’am, you actually want to be heading to your left, not your right,” is not assault or battery. |
She probably moves to the side of the sidewalk to be next to the human, rather than the dog, if she can’t cross the street. Doesn’t appear to want to be friendly to the dog. If it’s a dog walker, steps on a lawn to let them pass. IDK. That’s what I do. |
They will charge you and you need to prove it want to cause harm. IDK why you’re arguing about this. The boys parents said it was harm. She had to prove it wasn’t. Security guards can use their words. There is ZERO reason to touch someone in public. Why is this so hard for you to understand?! |
DP. If your dog is leashed and well-behaved, you wouldn't need to sit and hug it to keep it from other people. The PP is clearly talking about dogs who can't resist approaching strangers on sidewalks. If that's your dog, he is not "well-behaved." You have a responsibility to keep your dog away from strangers. Your dog should not be able to sniff, lick, or make a lot of physical contact (not talking about an incidental brush-by, but stuff like circling, head butting, and intentionally brushing up against looking for pets and attention) with a stranger unless they've given explicit permission. You need to train your dog not to do this stuff unless they get permission from the person AND from you. |
DP here: If your dog is so well behaved then you can see someone who is approaching and move him to the other side. Or stop and put them in a sit. Or have them on a head collar so you can keep them looking at you. If none of those work then your dog doesn’t belong on crowded sidewalks, so your options would include driving to a less crowded place or physically restraining your dog, or getting a dog trainer. |
|
I hate people touching me and it’s illegal for people to touch me without permission. Yet people keep bumping into me every single time I’m at a concert, festival, airport, or on the metro. I never told these people in advance that they can touch me, which makes it assault. I use clear body signals to show
I hate people. I put in noise-cancelling headphones, scowl, and cross my arms. I carry pepper spray and use it when people assault me like this. The police fully endorse this tactic and have supported me every time I use it. |
No. I have no obligation to do that. Keeping My dog on a short leash is plenty. Both my dog and I are allowed to be there. If you hate dogs that much, then YOU move. We’re not talking about a restaurant or grocery store where dogs are prohibited. These are dog-friendly sidewalks and walking trails. |
Really? Because a poster above said to drop bacon-covered chocolate on the ground. I’m a very careful and conscientious dog owner, and yet a poster recommends poisoning any and all dogs. That would include MINE. So tell me I have nothing to fear again. |
Oh, if only getting a dog required a license. We could solve many of these problems that way. Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a "licensed" dog and thus our streets are full of untrained dogs with idiot owners who have no business with a dog. Thus this thread and every one like it. If you love dogs and want others to tolerate dogs more, my suggestion is to start working on your fellow dog owners. They are the ones creating this problem with their bad behavior. If you see a person with an off leash dog, confront them. If you see people bringing their dogs into stores, confront them. If you see people using long or retractable leashes, walk up and tell them "that's not an appropriate leash for a dog, let me show you what an appropriate leash looks like" and so on. Dog owners have created this problem. There used to be far less antagonism towards dogs on the street. |
Who made them dog friendly? You don’t get to just proclaim that. Your dog will never have as many rights as the person walking, you lunatic. |
The “dogs permitted on a six-foot leash” sign, the county ordinances, the laws? Are you insane? |
You clearly know nothing about dogs. You are required to get a dog license to own a dog in every community within an hour of DC. |
You still don’t get it. A six foot leash AND you have to be able to stop your dog from bothering others. You are the insane one. |
No such thing. There are public places where dogs are not banned, but it doesn't mean they are "dog friendly." A "dog friendly" place would be a place designed for dogs -- a dog park, a business that labels itself "dog friendly", an event designed for dogs like pups at the park or a festival where people are encouraged to bring dogs. A sidewalk is designed for people, but dogs are allowed. They have to behave though, and they can't obstruct a person's ability to use the sidewalk. If your dog is doing things that make it hard for other people (including children, people in wheelchairs or with mobility problems, and people who don't want to come into physical contact with your dog for whatever reason) to use the sidewalk, you need to control your dog. The rights of people to use the sidewalk supersede your dog's access. It is not a place "for" dogs, it's just a place dogs are allowed to be (if well behaved). Same with trails, which is why trails that permit dogs ALWAYS require them to be on leash, something dog owners constantly flout because you care more about your dog's needs than those of the other human beings for whom the trail was designed and built. If you want a dog friendly place for your dog to run around, get a yard or visit a dog park. |
“Bothering” to people on this thread means passing a person on a narrow trail or a crowded sidewalk. Dogs are allowed to do that. Dogs are allowed to accidentally brush up against people or sniff in their direction. That doesn’t make the dog “out of control” or lawless, as many on this thread have said. |