Are we ready to admit that Woke & DEI and woke wasn’t what was holding you back from success?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, OP, I'm mostly just happy that I don't have to look at ads with ugly people, spend every day of pride month being re-educated, or explain why I won't announce my pronouns at the start of a meeting.

Stock market is doing awesome. Everything is great. No complaints.

In other words, you think black people are ugly, you’re happy inside your bubble, and you work for a fictional company where everyone is required to recite their pronouns at the start of each and every meeting. I’m fascinated, which company is this? And why are black people ugly?

The stock market’s performance has nothing to do with DEI.

I'm pretty sure he's mostly talking about fat people. But it's interesting you immediately thought he was talking about black people.

Lol! I wrote that bit about ugly people and just saw this thing where a liberal immediately interpreted that to mean "black people." Wtf! Man, that's really gross to think black = ugly. The left is crazy racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, OP, I'm mostly just happy that I don't have to look at ads with ugly people, spend every day of pride month being re-educated, or explain why I won't announce my pronouns at the start of a meeting.

Stock market is doing awesome. Everything is great. No complaints.

In other words, you think black people are ugly, you’re happy inside your bubble, and you work for a fictional company where everyone is required to recite their pronouns at the start of each and every meeting. I’m fascinated, which company is this? And why are black people ugly?

The stock market’s performance has nothing to do with DEI.

I'm pretty sure he's mostly talking about fat people. But it's interesting you immediately thought he was talking about black people.

Lol! I wrote that bit about ugly people and just saw this thing where a liberal immediately interpreted that to mean "black people." Wtf! Man, that's really gross to think black = ugly. The left is crazy racist.

Pp here again, I will elaborate. When I wrote this, I was reflecting on how American Eagle made us suffer through years of models baring armpit hair, physiques with proportions that no one even pretends to find attractive or aspirational, faces with dead eyes and short tufts of wiry blue hair. They even had a model with a colostomy bag, which is fine, but I shouldn't have to look at the colostomy bag! I dont make people look at MY toilet! Now that the tide has turned, they have Sydney Sweeney and other gorgeous models. And you might say, why does art need to be beautiful? It doesn't. But the right tends to prefer beauty while the left prefers ugly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has been able to list a single thing that the elimination of DEI and woke has benefited them personally. Not talking about owning the libs or feeling smug about the country in general. Have you been promoted at work now that the pesky females and black folk are out of the way? Has your child decided they are in fact not gay now that they aren’t being “programmed” at school? Has your business thrived more now that there are no migrants? I want real examples.

You didn't seem to appreciate how important owning the libs was in all of this. How much the rest of the country wanted you to just shut up.

And even after all this you can't shut your mouth. Not a hint of self reflection. Not a whiff of humility in your loss. Well, I guess we'll have to do it again in 2028 until you're fellow travelers are the ones screaming at you to just shut the fook up.

It just feels so good to own the libs.

Yeah when that runs out what do you have? Answer the OP question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, OP, I'm mostly just happy that I don't have to look at ads with ugly people, spend every day of pride month being re-educated, or explain why I won't announce my pronouns at the start of a meeting.

Stock market is doing awesome. Everything is great. No complaints.

In other words, you think black people are ugly, you’re happy inside your bubble, and you work for a fictional company where everyone is required to recite their pronouns at the start of each and every meeting. I’m fascinated, which company is this? And why are black people ugly?

The stock market’s performance has nothing to do with DEI.

I'm pretty sure he's mostly talking about fat people. But it's interesting you immediately thought he was talking about black people.

Lol! I wrote that bit about ugly people and just saw this thing where a liberal immediately interpreted that to mean "black people." Wtf! Man, that's really gross to think black = ugly. The left is crazy racist.

That’s because the comment was made within the context of a discussion of race and DEI (reminder: this is a thread about DEI, which does not include fat people or ugly people), so it came across as “so glad I no longer have to look at black people in ads”.

The right loves to say vague shit like this, then try to weasel their way out by claiming “oh no, that’s not what I meant”. God forbid you ever actually say what you mean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has been able to list a single thing that the elimination of DEI and woke has benefited them personally. Not talking about owning the libs or feeling smug about the country in general. Have you been promoted at work now that the pesky females and black folk are out of the way? Has your child decided they are in fact not gay now that they aren’t being “programmed” at school? Has your business thrived more now that there are no migrants? I want real examples.

You didn't seem to appreciate how important owning the libs was in all of this. How much the rest of the country wanted you to just shut up.

And even after all this you can't shut your mouth. Not a hint of self reflection. Not a whiff of humility in your loss. Well, I guess we'll have to do it again in 2028 until you're fellow travelers are the ones screaming at you to just shut the fook up.

It just feels so good to own the libs.

We’re not owned yet. Maybe if you close some more rural hospitals and teach your kids more fake history and shoot yourselves in the foot a few more times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has been able to list a single thing that the elimination of DEI and woke has benefited them personally. Not talking about owning the libs or feeling smug about the country in general. Have you been promoted at work now that the pesky females and black folk are out of the way? Has your child decided they are in fact not gay now that they aren’t being “programmed” at school? Has your business thrived more now that there are no migrants? I want real examples.

You didn't seem to appreciate how important owning the libs was in all of this. How much the rest of the country wanted you to just shut up.

And even after all this you can't shut your mouth. Not a hint of self reflection. Not a whiff of humility in your loss. Well, I guess we'll have to do it again in 2028 until you're fellow travelers are the ones screaming at you to just shut the fook up.

It just feels so good to own the libs.

Yeah when that runs out what do you have? Answer the OP question.

They’ll have an empty life ruled by a gnawing hatred that can never be sated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, OP, I'm mostly just happy that I don't have to look at ads with ugly people, spend every day of pride month being re-educated, or explain why I won't announce my pronouns at the start of a meeting.

Stock market is doing awesome. Everything is great. No complaints.

In other words, you think black people are ugly, you’re happy inside your bubble, and you work for a fictional company where everyone is required to recite their pronouns at the start of each and every meeting. I’m fascinated, which company is this? And why are black people ugly?

The stock market’s performance has nothing to do with DEI.

I'm pretty sure he's mostly talking about fat people. But it's interesting you immediately thought he was talking about black people.

Lol! I wrote that bit about ugly people and just saw this thing where a liberal immediately interpreted that to mean "black people." Wtf! Man, that's really gross to think black = ugly. The left is crazy racist.

That’s because the comment was made within the context of a discussion of race and DEI (reminder: this is a thread about DEI, which does not include fat people or ugly people), so it came across as “so glad I no longer have to look at black people in ads”.

The right loves to say vague shit like this, then try to weasel their way out by claiming “oh no, that’s not what I meant”. God forbid you ever actually say what you mean.

I thought the same thing when I saw that comment. PP made a connection in their head but didn’t explain it very well.

The explanation only dug the hole deeper. Talk about really gross. The hypocritical sanctimony of “how dare you accuse me of finding black people ugly” and then going on a rant about how icky people with disabilities are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

DEI = racism.

Are democrats seriously still supporting racism??

I've heard both Kamala Harris and Ketanji Brown Jackson referred to as "DEI hires" by people like you. But which is more racist - the fact that they are the first Black female VP and SC justice respectively, or the fact that nobody who occupied those positions between 1789 and 2021 was a Black female?

NP. People said that because Biden literally said he was going to choose a woman of color for each of those positions. Why didn’t he just say he was going to choose the best person & then pick them anyway? He is partially at fault for this perception.

And yes of course racism & sexism kept people like them out for centuries.

That's the whole problem. There are TONS of qualified women and people of color who could serve as Vice President or SCOTUS justices, it's racism and acting like it's somehow unfair for any of them to be chosen that has kept them out of office.

Brett Kavanaugh isn’t exactly the finest legal mind of the 21st century, but nobody questioned his fitness on the grounds of his skin color or gender. It was just assumed he was qualified.

White men get a free pass on this stuff. If a black woman is chosen: “why didn’t he pick the best person?” The unexamined assumption there is that the real best person is somewhere out there among the ranks of white men, getting unfairly passed over.

Kavanaugh was elevated by the Heritage Foundation and chosen by Trump to enact a specific right wing judicial agenda that has nothing to do with how smart he is or how unbiased he is or where he went to law school. If Biden decides he wants a black woman on SCOTUS, it’s because he wants to diversify the bench with different perspectives. From that standpoint, such a candidate is indeed the best person.

That’s obviously because white men are not a part of a group who gets preferential hiring based on skin color.
or gender. That’s why black women have to answer that question. You didn’t know that?

You’re joking right? White men have been a preferential group since the inception of this country. And there were and are bonus points if white, male, with money. Such white men have traditionally been the only people considered for all jobs and positions of middle, upper and elite positions.

That’s illegal and also not universal. We are talking about law and modern day policy. White men are facing a disadvantage in modern day hiring. Go look at WMATA and tell me about average white men having an advantage.

I’m a former WMATA employee and I now know you don’t know what the frack you are spewing. The majority of WMATA employees are white. You think you understand the underbelly of wmata because you ride a bus. You know nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

DEI = racism.

Are democrats seriously still supporting racism??

I've heard both Kamala Harris and Ketanji Brown Jackson referred to as "DEI hires" by people like you. But which is more racist - the fact that they are the first Black female VP and SC justice respectively, or the fact that nobody who occupied those positions between 1789 and 2021 was a Black female?

NP. People said that because Biden literally said he was going to choose a woman of color for each of those positions. Why didn’t he just say he was going to choose the best person & then pick them anyway? He is partially at fault for this perception.

And yes of course racism & sexism kept people like them out for centuries.

That's the whole problem. There are TONS of qualified women and people of color who could serve as Vice President or SCOTUS justices, it's racism and acting like it's somehow unfair for any of them to be chosen that has kept them out of office.

Brett Kavanaugh isn’t exactly the finest legal mind of the 21st century, but nobody questioned his fitness on the grounds of his skin color or gender. It was just assumed he was qualified.

White men get a free pass on this stuff. If a black woman is chosen: “why didn’t he pick the best person?” The unexamined assumption there is that the real best person is somewhere out there among the ranks of white men, getting unfairly passed over.

Kavanaugh was elevated by the Heritage Foundation and chosen by Trump to enact a specific right wing judicial agenda that has nothing to do with how smart he is or how unbiased he is or where he went to law school. If Biden decides he wants a black woman on SCOTUS, it’s because he wants to diversify the bench with different perspectives. From that standpoint, such a candidate is indeed the best person.

That’s obviously because white men are not a part of a group who gets preferential hiring based on skin color.
or gender. That’s why black women have to answer that question. You didn’t know that?

You’re joking right? White men have been a preferential group since the inception of this country. And there were and are bonus points if white, male, with money. Such white men have traditionally been the only people considered for all jobs and positions of middle, upper and elite positions.

That’s illegal and also not universal. We are talking about law and modern day policy. White men are facing a disadvantage in modern day hiring. Go look at WMATA and tell me about average white men having an advantage.

I’m a former WMATA employee and I now know you don’t know what the frack you are spewing. The majority of WMATA employees are white. You think you understand the underbelly of wmata because you ride a bus. You know nothing.

DP. This is straight up false. Did you not see PP’s link? Around 75% are black.

https://www.wmata.com/rider-guide/upload/2022-2025-Equal-Employment-Opportunity-Program.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, OP, I'm mostly just happy that I don't have to look at ads with ugly people, spend every day of pride month being re-educated, or explain why I won't announce my pronouns at the start of a meeting.

Stock market is doing awesome. Everything is great. No complaints.

In other words, you think black people are ugly, you’re happy inside your bubble, and you work for a fictional company where everyone is required to recite their pronouns at the start of each and every meeting. I’m fascinated, which company is this? And why are black people ugly?

The stock market’s performance has nothing to do with DEI.

I'm pretty sure he's mostly talking about fat people. But it's interesting you immediately thought he was talking about black people.

Lol! I wrote that bit about ugly people and just saw this thing where a liberal immediately interpreted that to mean "black people." Wtf! Man, that's really gross to think black = ugly. The left is crazy racist.

That’s because the comment was made within the context of a discussion of race and DEI (reminder: this is a thread about DEI, which does not include fat people or ugly people), so it came across as “so glad I no longer have to look at black people in ads”.

The right loves to say vague shit like this, then try to weasel their way out by claiming “oh no, that’s not what I meant”. God forbid you ever actually say what you mean.

It would never have even occurred to me that people would equate black with ugly. We live in an age where Beyonce and Zendaya are A listers. It is just not a natural conclusion, even in the context of DEI.

DEI in ads was absolutely all about an androgynous aesthetic in which body hair was prominently featured and other items, like colostomy bags, were front and center. Look at Ella Emhoff's modeling work. Half the time she had visible, pus filled zits, usually had her eyebrows grown together like Frida, and wore her hair in an unfeminine way. This is all unnecessary. Normally people would do something about the giant zits before the photo shoot. But the woke agenda is to make us pretend this is the preferred, most attractive look. It's not.

It's not making fun of people with disabilities to say you dont want to look at colostomy bags while shopping for jeans. In normal life, I've never seen someone just letting it all hang out there. This "look at my armpit hair" "look at my poop bag" "it's all as beautiful as Sydney Sweeney" is just gas lighting and gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, OP, I'm mostly just happy that I don't have to look at ads with ugly people, spend every day of pride month being re-educated, or explain why I won't announce my pronouns at the start of a meeting.

Stock market is doing awesome. Everything is great. No complaints.

In other words, you think black people are ugly, you’re happy inside your bubble, and you work for a fictional company where everyone is required to recite their pronouns at the start of each and every meeting. I’m fascinated, which company is this? And why are black people ugly?

The stock market’s performance has nothing to do with DEI.

I'm pretty sure he's mostly talking about fat people. But it's interesting you immediately thought he was talking about black people.

Lol! I wrote that bit about ugly people and just saw this thing where a liberal immediately interpreted that to mean "black people." Wtf! Man, that's really gross to think black = ugly. The left is crazy racist.

That’s because the comment was made within the context of a discussion of race and DEI (reminder: this is a thread about DEI, which does not include fat people or ugly people), so it came across as “so glad I no longer have to look at black people in ads”.

The right loves to say vague shit like this, then try to weasel their way out by claiming “oh no, that’s not what I meant”. God forbid you ever actually say what you mean.

It would never have even occurred to me that people would equate black with ugly. We live in an age where Beyonce and Zendaya are A listers. It is just not a natural conclusion, even in the context of DEI.

DEI in ads was absolutely all about an androgynous aesthetic in which body hair was prominently featured and other items, like colostomy bags, were front and center. Look at Ella Emhoff's modeling work. Half the time she had visible, pus filled zits, usually had her eyebrows grown together like Frida, and wore her hair in an unfeminine way. This is all unnecessary. Normally people would do something about the giant zits before the photo shoot. But the woke agenda is to make us pretend this is the preferred, most attractive look. It's not.

It's not making fun of people with disabilities to say you dont want to look at colostomy bags while shopping for jeans. In normal life, I've never seen someone just letting it all hang out there. This "look at my armpit hair" "look at my poop bag" "it's all as beautiful as Sydney Sweeney" is just gas lighting and gross.

And maybe some of us don’t want to look at airbrushed, underweight models and be gaslit into thinking we’re inadequate because we don’t measure up to a fake ideal of Photoshopped perfection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has been able to list a single thing that the elimination of DEI and woke has benefited them personally. Not talking about owning the libs or feeling smug about the country in general. Have you been promoted at work now that the pesky females and black folk are out of the way? Has your child decided they are in fact not gay now that they aren’t being “programmed” at school? Has your business thrived more now that there are no migrants? I want real examples.

You didn't seem to appreciate how important owning the libs was in all of this. How much the rest of the country wanted you to just shut up.

And even after all this you can't shut your mouth. Not a hint of self reflection. Not a whiff of humility in your loss. Well, I guess we'll have to do it again in 2028 until you're fellow travelers are the ones screaming at you to just shut the fook up.

It just feels so good to own the libs.

We’re not owned yet. Maybe if you close some more rural hospitals and teach your kids more fake history and shoot yourselves in the foot a few more times.

This is the social compact breaking down. We need urgency to restore it:

1 - Mass [twitter]deportations
2 - Stop the H-1B scam
3 - Dramatically reduce LEGAL Immigration
4 - End chain migration and the Visa Lottery
5 - Build 10 million homes for Americans
6 - Crush the College Cartel

[twitter] https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1956044288573497681?s=46[/twitter]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has been able to list a single thing that the elimination of DEI and woke has benefited them personally. Not talking about owning the libs or feeling smug about the country in general. Have you been promoted at work now that the pesky females and black folk are out of the way? Has your child decided they are in fact not gay now that they aren’t being “programmed” at school? Has your business thrived more now that there are no migrants? I want real examples.

You didn't seem to appreciate how important owning the libs was in all of this. How much the rest of the country wanted you to just shut up.

And even after all this you can't shut your mouth. Not a hint of self reflection. Not a whiff of humility in your loss. Well, I guess we'll have to do it again in 2028 until you're fellow travelers are the ones screaming at you to just shut the fook up.

It just feels so good to own the libs.

We’re not owned yet. Maybe if you close some more rural hospitals and teach your kids more fake history and shoot yourselves in the foot a few more times.

This is the social compact breaking down. We need urgency to restore it:

1 - Mass [twitter]deportations
2 - Stop the H-1B scam
3 - Dramatically reduce LEGAL Immigration
4 - End chain migration and the Visa Lottery
5 - Build 10 million homes for Americans
6 - Crush the College Cartel

[twitter] https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1956044288573497681?s=46[/twitter]

[twitter] https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1956044288573497681?s=46[/twitter]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has been able to list a single thing that the elimination of DEI and woke has benefited them personally. Not talking about owning the libs or feeling smug about the country in general. Have you been promoted at work now that the pesky females and black folk are out of the way? Has your child decided they are in fact not gay now that they aren’t being “programmed” at school? Has your business thrived more now that there are no migrants? I want real examples.

You didn't seem to appreciate how important owning the libs was in all of this. How much the rest of the country wanted you to just shut up.

And even after all this you can't shut your mouth. Not a hint of self reflection. Not a whiff of humility in your loss. Well, I guess we'll have to do it again in 2028 until you're fellow travelers are the ones screaming at you to just shut the fook up.

It just feels so good to own the libs.

We’re not owned yet. Maybe if you close some more rural hospitals and teach your kids more fake history and shoot yourselves in the foot a few more times.

This is the social compact breaking down. We need urgency to restore it:

1 - Mass [twitter]deportations
2 - Stop the H-1B scam
3 - Dramatically reduce LEGAL Immigration
4 - End chain migration and the Visa Lottery
5 - Build 10 million homes for Americans
6 - Crush the College Cartel

[twitter] https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1956044288573497681?s=46[/twitter]

No, we need people to start honoring the social compact again and stop voting for people to burn it all down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, OP, I'm mostly just happy that I don't have to look at ads with ugly people, spend every day of pride month being re-educated, or explain why I won't announce my pronouns at the start of a meeting.

Stock market is doing awesome. Everything is great. No complaints.

In other words, you think black people are ugly, you’re happy inside your bubble, and you work for a fictional company where everyone is required to recite their pronouns at the start of each and every meeting. I’m fascinated, which company is this? And why are black people ugly?

The stock market’s performance has nothing to do with DEI.

I'm pretty sure he's mostly talking about fat people. But it's interesting you immediately thought he was talking about black people.

Lol! I wrote that bit about ugly people and just saw this thing where a liberal immediately interpreted that to mean "black people." Wtf! Man, that's really gross to think black = ugly. The left is crazy racist.

That’s because the comment was made within the context of a discussion of race and DEI (reminder: this is a thread about DEI, which does not include fat people or ugly people), so it came across as “so glad I no longer have to look at black people in ads”.

The right loves to say vague shit like this, then try to weasel their way out by claiming “oh no, that’s not what I meant”. God forbid you ever actually say what you mean.

NP. DEI absolutely includes fat people. Where have you been? Did you miss the entire size inclusivity movement?

I agree that the immediate jump to Black people was insanely racist.