Israel is trying to drag America into a war w/ Iran

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Tell us more about your secret cult definition of Zionism.

Most Americans believe Israel has the right to exist. They also believe it is a successful, well educated democracy with excellent women’s rights and technology.

[Anonymous]

And fun beaches, good food and music.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And fun beaches, good food and music.

Good food? Now I know this is satire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Tell us more about your secret cult definition of Zionism.

Most Americans believe Israel has the right to exist. They also believe it is a successful, well educated democracy with excellent women’s rights and technology.

No nation has a right to exist. Not Israel, not Iran, not even the U.S.

The entitlement is derangement-level … right to exist? Who bestowed this right you speak of?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Always with the vague threats about how rough things are going to get for Jews.

And FWIW, your definition of Zionism is yours alone. When I say that most Jews are Zionists, I mean that most Jews believe in a Jewish homeland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Tell us more about your secret cult definition of Zionism.

Most Americans believe Israel has the right to exist. They also believe it is a successful, well educated democracy with excellent women’s rights and technology.

DP

Can we really call it successful if it has only proven that it can exist as a welfare queen, sucking at Uncle Sam’s teet to survive?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Tell us more about your secret cult definition of Zionism.

Most Americans believe Israel has the right to exist. They also believe it is a successful, well educated democracy with excellent women’s rights and technology.

No nation has a right to exist. Not Israel, not Iran, not even the U.S.

The entitlement is derangement-level … right to exist? Who bestowed this right you speak of?

The UN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Tell us more about your secret cult definition of Zionism.

Most Americans believe Israel has the right to exist. They also believe it is a successful, well educated democracy with excellent women’s rights and technology.

No nation has a right to exist. Not Israel, not Iran, not even the U.S.

The entitlement is derangement-level … right to exist? Who bestowed this right you speak of?

The UN.

Wait - you’re now back to pointing to the U.N. For legitimacy?

[Anonymous]

Iran, if pushed, will have no prob throwing out all the gatekeepers and watchful eyes on them to not get nuclear arsenal. The US is not going to want escalation by Israel to drive Iran to this point. Once that happens, it's a lot more dangerous for everyone. I suspect Iran is really not wanting to fight the US at all. Who in their right minds wants a war except fools like Putin and Bibi? There's status quo squabbles and killings but then there's all out devastating war. The Israelis are leveraging their opportunity to go as far as they can given that Biden in this election year has not at all drawn any line to help militarily. It's a smart move by Bibi to destroy as much of his enemy as possible as he has the opportunity but in the long run it's not a good thing for anyone to make this a nonstop drama. The IS has handled things badly. Kinda like an easy parent who never disciplined their kids and now in trouble as the kids pay no mind to them anymore. We are in for some bad times in the ME saga.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Always with the vague threats about how rough things are going to get for Jews.

And FWIW, your definition of Zionism is yours alone. When I say that most Jews are Zionists, I mean that most Jews believe in a Jewish homeland.

Stop misusing the term “threat”, amigo. Is your local weatherman “threatening” the suburbs around Baltimore when he forecasts more precipitation than usual this time of year over the next two weeks? Are those threats?

How is that different than predicting that there will be an era of accountability, and that people like you will be disheartened to see the lack of accountability you’ve thrived under for the past 80 years fade away? Do you have a problem with accountability? I mean, I know you do … but care to admit it here?

I know your ilk is obsessed with vengeance and trying to silence others by suggesting that they are doing something wrong, but waste someone else’s time with your cartoonish accusations of threats and supporting terrorism and whatever else you care to toss into the wind - those paying attention know it’s just a confession of your own sins anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I honestly think the missile launch by Iran was a sign of weakness. They have to look strong given Israel is decimating their terrorist proxies and related networks along with the direction killing of the Hamas leader in Iran. Unless Iran is planning a ground invasion or upping their nuclear efforts, it seems like a lot of bluster.

Agreed. Remember it's Israel that actually has nuclear-weapons power. Iran has made progress and has enriched uranium but does not have weapons yet. All of these stories are circulating that Iran is a great mastermind and in control of Hamas and Hezbollah. I don't doubt that they all have a common enemy (Israel, now more so than ever, the US) and I am sure Iran sold them weapons, but I am doubtful that the coordination is all that centralized. Also Persians are ethnically and linguistically different from Arabs. I am sure we and the western European Israelis view them as people descend from the Arab hoards that swept in and kicked them out thousands of years ago but that is just not true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Always with the vague threats about how rough things are going to get for Jews.

And FWIW, your definition of Zionism is yours alone. When I say that most Jews are Zionists, I mean that most Jews believe in a Jewish homeland.

That’s not Zionism. FFS, I don’t oppose the existence of a Jewish homeland (assuming it reforms from the catastrophe that Israel is at present).

Does that make me a Zionist? No, because I don’t believe in violently displacing others to expand Israel, I don’t believe that Jews are better than everyone else, and I don’t believe in dehumanizing indigenous people in a craven effort to blame them for the atrocities that Israel has visited upon them for decades.

That … ^^^ … that’s the true mission of Zionism. It’s a hideous mission hiding behind a Jewish homeland charade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Tell us more about your secret cult definition of Zionism.

Most Americans believe Israel has the right to exist. They also believe it is a successful, well educated democracy with excellent women’s rights and technology.

DP

Can we really call it successful if it has only proven that it can exist as a welfare queen, sucking at Uncle Sam’s teet to survive?

Like every other European country?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know why the news coverage is so asymmetric? The bombs dropped in Israel are so full of empathetic videos of "oh no." "Oh this is just so tragic. I hope everyone is safe and ok..."

On the other hand, the coverage of bombings anywhere outside of Israel by Israel is presented in a cold/calculated manner or is completely victorious sounding... anyone else see this dichotomy?

Look at the makeup of the lead anchors, Tapper, Bash, Blitzer, etc. and you have your answer.

And then they tell you "You're 'antisemitic!' because they stupidly think it's about them simply being Jewish rather than literal Zionists. Wolf Blitzer *directly* worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post. Jonah Goldberg was a damned prison guard in Israel. David Brooks' son was in the IDF, Bret Stephens wrote an article about the "diseased Arab Mind" and THEN got hired by the NYT. Dana Bash and Jake Tapper are outright lying and spreading Israeli propaganda.

You think this glaring Zionism having tainted US media coverage for a very long time, hasn't been precisely what has brainwashed Americans into believing every Arab and Muslim is some nefarious, inhuman caricature when these are just some of the people who get to DEFINE the conflict in US media? I can go even further with the list of people who've so profoundly failed the American people when it comes to journalistic integrity in covering this *occupation*

Most Jews are Zionists. So you kind of are talking about them.

Most Americans are Zionists.

The percentage of Americans that think Israel has no right to exist is vanishingly small. Zionist is not the insult that progressives seem to think it is. It's like denouncing Air Breathers.

Not sure what’s more astonishing - the fact that you actually expect others to believe that Zionism isn’t far more insidious than your “right to exist” blather, or the fact that just 80 years later, you actually believe that it’s all sewn up, that the sides have been set, and that the pendulum will never again swing against you.

I only regret that I won’t be able to see your face when the moment of realization arrives. That moment when accountability comes calling will be a rough one for you and those like you.

Always with the vague threats about how rough things are going to get for Jews.

And FWIW, your definition of Zionism is yours alone. When I say that most Jews are Zionists, I mean that most Jews believe in a Jewish homeland.

Stop misusing the term “threat”, amigo. Is your local weatherman “threatening” the suburbs around Baltimore when he forecasts more precipitation than usual this time of year over the next two weeks? Are those threats?

How is that different than predicting that there will be an era of accountability, and that people like you will be disheartened to see the lack of accountability you’ve thrived under for the past 80 years fade away? Do you have a problem with accountability? I mean, I know you do … but care to admit it here?

I know your ilk is obsessed with vengeance and trying to silence others by suggesting that they are doing something wrong, but waste someone else’s time with your cartoonish accusations of threats and supporting terrorism and whatever else you care to toss into the wind - those paying attention know it’s just a confession of your own sins anyway.

lol
These posts are ridiculous.