Is it not clear to you that your comment is easily taken to suggest else? You made it sound like they wouldn't need to rely on skills and professional performance. |
So start pushing if you're so sure. No one is stopping you. |
Never, ever did I shit on a woman so stop characterizing my words as such. What I am is not delusional that some of these things still matter. Like I said, lead the way. Be brave, support the women as you say but leading by example. Go ahead. |
Most older women of the upper management level age today were not of a generation that eschewed leg and armpit shaving - so of course you are not likely to see them. Whereas, the younger generation is making its way up - a generation more open minded and less sexist, facilitating more hairy legged women up the career ladder. Women were wearing pants because of the projection of more masculine authority and "credibility" - not because they were hiding hairy legs. And if one isn't looking and scrutinizing women's visible legs, one doesn't see any hairy ones there may be. Maybe in your professional world you don't see any because there aren't any - which brings me back to my original points. If you can't follow the logic, I hope you're not upper management. |
| We had a presentation by a colleague at work. She wore a skirt, and her legs were very hairy. Clearly, this is a personal choice. I am not proud to say that I could not stop looking at the extremely hairy legs. |
I'm 57, no longer wear pantyhose but am in skirts all summer. Team DD! |
I’m tired and I like my smooth legs. But my DD doesn’t care about shaving and I support her. I like seeing young people in the office bucking the norms. Seriously. It makes me smile. Traditional corporate dress codes are relics from another era. |
You said that any woman who doesn’t shave her legs doesn’t deserve to be promoted to upper management. You’re 100% sh!tting on women, progress and equal rights. You’re kind of a nasty gross human being in total, really. |
PP here. It didn't occur to me when I was younger that I needed to. I didn't care. I didn't question. I took shaving legs as what you do. But I'm older and wiser now. Even though shaved legs and armpits are still MY preference both physically feeling wise and appearance wise, I have a broader perspective. The younger generation is more pushback, more questioning. Good for them. I don't need to be brave. They don't have to be brave - but if they want to show their confidence and courage, kudos to them. I'm not "expecting" the young generation to break ceilings or social norms .... but I expect that they will. |
I am a millennial and I shave my legs but I would never care if one of my employees wore a dress and hadn't shaved her legs. It is literally none of my business. |
DP. I've done the pushing I've felt compelled to do for my life. I continue to "push" by supporting and encouraging my children to do the same, especially my daughter. What is it you expect me to do to "push" now? I don't care whether the next generations of girls shave their legs or not, it no longer impacts me directly, but I support the continued efforts by those who come after me. |
You’re so insecure and full of internalized misogyny that you can’t even accept young women not shaving their legs? Why do you need to control the body hair of other women? What pride does that give you? All you’ve done on this thread is talk about how awful that would be, how no one in management/c suite does this, and when people DO say they do it, you talk down to them as well. You are not encouraging of women. You are a roadblock to be manoeuvred around so women can feel comfortable and confident in the workplace. Instead of quipping back with whatever catty remark you’re likely to make, you should really try some internal reflection. Why are you so opposed to young women (or any women) doing something different than you? Why are you so quick to judge someone who does something different than you as lower class, dumber or less successful? If you truly want to advocate for women and women’s rights in the workplace, starting with NOT rabidly hating women who choose different leg hair removal methodologies would be a good start. |
Good for you! This is merely recognizing our own discomforts and respecting the choices of others. When faced with something unusual that goes against all "norms" we've held our entire lives, we are merely uncomfortable - or revolted or turned off by - those things. But it doesn't make them WRONG. Greater comfort comes with greater exposure as new norms evolve. Eventually, nobody will give two hoots (literally and figuratively) about what hair is or isn't on a woman's legs in the workplace. |
Agree. I'm "old-fashioned" and still prefer women shave their pits and legs. I also prefer people dressing for work, not going to school in their pajamas, etc. The "norms" are changing and all things considered, so what? I will always believe people should dress differently and appropriately for different situations - that how you dress reflects self-respect and your respect for others/the occasion. But if jacket and khakis instead of business suit and tie is that new level of appropriateness and respect, so what? I may mourn what I perceive the "losses" to be, but that doesn't necessarily make me right. |
Well, and I wouldn’t say this is a sexist thing. Because I don’t see men’s hairy legs either. If they were showing up to work in that way, I would be team DD. |