Harris Walz interview w CNN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"my values have not changed" but positions have.

She just called the interviewer the wrong name. A Biden moment!

Trump and MAGAs like Nancy Mace deliberately mangle Harris’s first name. Didn’t hear you squawking about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Man, that fracking answer was painful.

Kamala: I never said I would ban fracking.

Bash: In 2019 you said you would ban fracking.

Kamala: And then in 2020 I said I wouldn’t.

+1
Same with being in favor of decriminalizing border crossings in 2019 - but insisting she "recognizes the problem" now. Okaaaaay...

[Anonymous]

She kind of looks teary eyed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you're explaining, you're losing. Kamala is losing in this interview.

It's a prerecorded, heavily edited interview with friendly media which refuses to release the full interview and transcript. How bad is the rest of it? I can't imagine her in a room with Putin or Xi. Ooof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris is not fit for office. She might be worse than Biden.

Might be? Oh no, she’s straight up way worse!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Walz is literally a bobble head.

He has a look on his face that is simultaneously contrite and embarrassed.

[Anonymous]

Ugh. I could not figure out a way to stream this as a cord-cutter. Can’t even get it on Hulu without a $70 upgrade - not paying it. I tried to create an account for a free trial but no, only available through TV providers.

Will this be released on YouTube?

[Anonymous]

She looks down wayyyyy too much.

[Anonymous]

She can’t stand alone. She’s weak and knows she’s not capable to be president. Is she going to add Walz chair to the Oval Office as well? Maybe get herself a booster seat so she can sit in the back and babble and laugh with joy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris is not fit for office. She might be worse than Biden.

Troll fail...

She’s wasted and mumbling through a pre-recorded interview that lasts under 20 minutes and she has to bring her daddy.

She cannot remember her position from one day to the next. Her only platform is anti- Trump.

She’s weak, she’s an embarrassment, she’s low energy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She can’t stand alone. She’s weak and knows she’s not capable to be president. Is she going to add Walz chair to the Oval Office as well? Maybe get herself a booster seat so she can sit in the back and babble and laugh with joy?

Donald, is that you?

[Anonymous]

Walz cannot answer directly either.

[Anonymous]

She is saying exactly what she thinks the voters want to hear - even if it's a total 180 from what she used to say.

[Anonymous]

But is she making the Govt pay for IVF?

[Anonymous]

Aaaaah, I thought she was going to launch into the "significance of the passage of time" when she said "the significance..."