Harris Walz interview w CNN

[Anonymous]

Walz is literally a bobble head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Walz is literally a bobble head.

🤣🤣🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She seems slightly drunk.

You're drunk!

I don’t drink nor do drugs.

[Anonymous]

Ha ha ha ha ha

[Anonymous]

From what I see it was a great interview

[Anonymous]

Thank you Dana Bash:

"Why did the Biden-Harris Administration wait 3 1/2 years to implement sweeping asylum restrictions?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ha ha ha ha ha

Shut up!

[Anonymous]

Kamala Harris is not fit for office. She might be worse than Biden.

[Anonymous]

Her day 1 was 3 1/2 years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha ha ha ha ha

Shut up!

Calm down Dougie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s with all the empty coffee mugs and soda bottles in the background? The table between Harris and the viewer is a bad optic, it makes her look gaurded/insecure. To date her advance team has done well, but this interview setting is a failure.

Agree on the optics. I say this as a huge fan otherwise. I also think she would have come across stringer on her own (with Walz doing a separate interview if needed).

The clip on Trump's race comments also seemed like a missed opportunity - it was a very sympathetic question for her. Odd.

[Anonymous]

Man, that fracking answer was painful.

Kamala: I never said I would ban fracking.

Bash: In 2019 you said you would ban fracking.

Kamala: And then in 2020 I said I wouldn’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris is not fit for office. She might be worse than Biden.

Troll fail...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thank you Dana Bash:

"Why did the Biden-Harris Administration wait 3 1/2 years to implement sweeping asylum restrictions?"

Of course, she totally deflected to the border bill and never answered this very simple question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s with all the empty coffee mugs and soda bottles in the background? The table between Harris and the viewer is a bad optic, it makes her look gaurded/insecure. To date her advance team has done well, but this interview setting is a failure.

Agree on the optics. I say this as a huge fan otherwise. I also think she would have come across stringer on her own (with Walz doing a separate interview if needed).

The clip on Trump's race comments also seemed like a missed opportunity - it was a very sympathetic question for her. Odd.

Maybe she doesn’t need to rely on identity politics at this point.