Harris Walz interview w CNN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Aaaaah, I thought she was going to launch into the "significance of the passage of time" when she said "the significance..."

My heart skipped a beat….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is saying exactly what she thinks the voters want to hear - even if it's a total 180 from what she used to say.

Right. Now it’s secure the border from criminals and traffickers? She sounds like Trump 2016.

Is she going to say grab em by the pussy next?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you're explaining, you're losing. Kamala is losing in this interview.

It's a prerecorded, heavily edited interview with friendly media which refuses to release the full interview and transcript. How bad is the rest of it? I can't imagine her in a room with Putin or Xi. Ooof.

There's no such thing as Democrat-friendly media. There's only corporate media which only cares about clicks and views, and right wing media, neither of which are friendly to Democrats.

And we've known that ever since the corporate media took Hillary down with that "Butter Emails" bullshit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She can’t stand alone. She’s weak and knows she’s not capable to be president. Is she going to add Walz chair to the Oval Office as well? Maybe get herself a booster seat so she can sit in the back and babble and laugh with joy?

Donald, is that you?

Donald is finishing a Town Hall in Wisconsin right now. Where is Kamala doing her Town Hall tonight?

[Anonymous]

Her hair is too long and dragging down her face. She’d look much better w a fresh haircut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi was correct when she said Kamala lacks confidence and nervously laughs because she doesn’t know what she stands for or what to say

Tulsi confidently serves as Putin's spokesperson.

[Anonymous]

This is bad

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But is she making the Govt pay for IVF?

Not until next week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She can’t stand alone. She’s weak and knows she’s not capable to be president. Is she going to add Walz chair to the Oval Office as well? Maybe get herself a booster seat so she can sit in the back and babble and laugh with joy?

Donald, is that you?

Donald is finishing a Town Hall in Wisconsin right now. Where is Kamala doing her Town Hall tonight?

Town halls,
We love town halls.
So many towns,
Lotta towns.

I’m pro-choice, ok?
They call it pro-choice.
Everybody likes choice.
Gotta have choice.

So we’ll have to see,
We’ll have to see what happens.

[Anonymous]

I would love to be a fly on the wall at Obama household right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is saying exactly what she thinks the voters want to hear - even if it's a total 180 from what she used to say.

Maybe she's trying to troll Trump into being against border security. Trump's whole platform these days seems to be nothing but knee jerk 180 from whatever "the other side" says and nothing more.

Either way it's pretty funny that the MAGAs are now trying to trash her for being pro border security. Make up your minds, people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you're explaining, you're losing. Kamala is losing in this interview.

It's a prerecorded, heavily edited interview with friendly media which refuses to release the full interview and transcript. How bad is the rest of it? I can't imagine her in a room with Putin or Xi. Ooof.

There's no such thing as Democrat-friendly media. There's only corporate media which only cares about clicks and views, and right wing media, neither of which are friendly to Democrats.

And we've known that ever since the corporate media took Hillary down with that "Butter Emails" bullshit.

You can't be serious. Bash just interviewed Vance a couple of weeks ago. The tone was completely different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you're explaining, you're losing. Kamala is losing in this interview.

It's a prerecorded, heavily edited interview with friendly media which refuses to release the full interview and transcript. How bad is the rest of it? I can't imagine her in a room with Putin or Xi. Ooof.

At the very beginning, Dana Bash said the interview was being shown in its entirety. Yall also said it was only 18 minutes, well we are already more than 30 minutes in, and last time I checked, 30 was more than 18. What lies will you trumpers sprout next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Walz cannot answer directly either.

+1
Dana Bash asked him two very pointed questions and he deflected each time to his (obviously rehearsed) talking points. I'm not a huge Dana Bash fan, but she's doing an excellent job of asking the hard questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is saying exactly what she thinks the voters want to hear - even if it's a total 180 from what she used to say.

Maybe she's trying to troll Trump into being against border security. Trump's whole platform these days seems to be nothing but knee jerk 180 from whatever "the other side" says and nothing more.

Either way it's pretty funny that the MAGAs are now trying to trash her for being pro border security. Make up your minds, people.

SHE IS IN CHARGE OF THE BORDER RIGHT NOW DUMBASS.