Second Gentleman scandal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emhoff had a position of power relative to the nanny, and he abused it.

Was the pregnancy terminated?

The gossip mill says maybe.

None of the rest of the world cares.

I care. The first guy sounds like a loose cannon sex pest who can be blackmailed and extorted. .

[Anonymous]

I mean is Harris going to pull Trump move and put Emhoff in charge of official business a la Ivanka?

If not, I'm not interested. It's her, I'm voting for.

[Anonymous]

Who cares? Trump is running for President. He cheated and had affairs on all three of his wives, bragged about being able to commit sexual assault on a microphone and get away with it because he's a celebrity, and was found liable for sexual abuse this year.

Doug Emhoff is running for ... nothing lol. He isn't on the ballot. He is the husband of the person running for President. If first marriage ended decades ago because he cheated, it's irrelevant because it was not in his current relationship and decades before he met Harris.

Would we care if Melania cheated on previous relationship decades before she even met Donald Trump? No. We only should focus on Donald Trump having cheated on her and all his other wives instead since he (not Melania) is on the ballot.

This weak story makes me realize we should talk more about Trump cheating on all of his wives and being found liable for sexual abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And as usual reality check.

Doug Emhoff goes on to have a successful law career and another happy marriage to a very successful woman who was deeply involved in raising his children. The ex wife forgives him to some extent and co-parents. He has a shot at becoming out country’s First Gentleman, after spending 4 years as a Second Gentleman.

The nanny loses her school job, moves across the country, and finds herself going into service for another rich family. She is unable to resume her teaching career and is still working with other people’s infants many years later, now obese and likely with a bad back. She keeps her peace all of these years.

Real world, folks. Real world.

So which one is it? The nanny's life was ruined, or there's an NDA and she was paid millions of dollars?

Emhoff has admitted to cheating on his Ex-Wife, and ruining his marriage. And telling Harris about what he did before they got married. I have lost respect for Emhoff, and will not be voting for him, ever.

[Anonymous]

What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

These two sentences from the Daily Mail article suggest Naylor did not have/keep the baby.

"Another friend with intimate knowledge of the scandal, confirmed the affair with Emhoff, but told DailyMail.com that Naylor did not keep the baby."

"A search of Los Angeles County birth records showed no registrations for a ‘Brook Naylor’ born in 2008 or 2009. There were no babies born with the last name ‘Emhoff’ in the county in those two years either."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13703933/Kamala-Harris-Doug-Emhoff-cheated-nanny-Najen-Nayler.html

[Anonymous]

So here is the issue when you spend 10 years attacking women for anything and everything… it stops sticking. Let’s look at Trump’s history of remarks on women:

She’s ugly/has a weird laugh/whatever: every woman he’s ever met
Her ethnic identity is fake: Elizabeth Warren
Her husband is a dog: Hillary Clinton

It’s old. Even though it didn’t happen to Kamala Harris before, we’ve heard it before.

I can’t see this sticking. Ordinarily it would, but we’re not in ordinary times. Remember when he said Mika Brezinski was bleeding from her face from plastic surgery? Like how do you not tune that out eventually??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

I absolutely agree that it's a vile thing to do. I won't support someone like this, if they run for office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

No doubt, but they would probably be more concerned about voting for a man who has had at least 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#karen-johnson-12

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emhoff had a position of power relative to the nanny, and he abused it.

Was the pregnancy terminated?

The gossip mill says maybe.

None of the rest of the world cares.

I care. The first guy sounds like a loose cannon sex pest who can be blackmailed and extorted. .

Well good thing he doesn’t have any access to classified materials or any sensitive responsibilities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

No doubt, but they would probably be more concerned about voting for a man who has had at least 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#karen-johnson-12

You think this is the only time Doug has been a creep? Oh, sweetie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?


Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.


A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

Feminist here. I don't care for several reasons.

1) He is not running for public office.

2) We don't know what the situation was regarding employment and "taking advantage". Maybe it was consensual. Maybe
she was no longer employed. We don't know exactly what happened. Heck, we don't know definitively if she was
pregnant.

3) If Harris knew about this and has a good relationship with him, who cares? It's their private life to live.

4) I am more angry that someone intruded on this woman's life by writing about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

No doubt, but they would probably be more concerned about voting for a man who has had at least 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#karen-johnson-12

You think this is the only time Doug has been a creep? Oh, sweetie.

Lest we forget when he locked lips with Dr. Biden at SOTU. Bad judgment on display.