Second Gentleman scandal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

No doubt, but they would probably be more concerned about voting for a man who has had at least 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#karen-johnson-12

You think this is the only time Doug has been a creep? Oh, sweetie.

Lest we forget when he locked lips with Dr. Biden at SOTU. Bad judgment on display.

He’s a loose cannon. He can’t control himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is hilarious. So much spluttering from Democrats who clearly can dish it out (in spades) but can’t take a dose of their own medicine. Oh, and here’s CNN reporting on it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/03/politics/doug-emhoff-acknowledges-affair-during-first-marriage/index.html

What's hilarious is how dumb it is for the GOP attack Harris on this given she hadn't even met Emhoff at the time and given who the GOP candidate is. I mean you definitely can try, it just probably won't work out the way you want it to.

We can certainly mock him about this. It makes you so, so upset - even though you had no trouble mocking Melania and other Trump family members. You seem to have conveniently forgotten that while you play the victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is hilarious. So much spluttering from Democrats who clearly can dish it out (in spades) but can’t take a dose of their own medicine. Oh, and here’s CNN reporting on it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/03/politics/doug-emhoff-acknowledges-affair-during-first-marriage/index.html

What's hilarious is how dumb it is for the GOP attack Harris on this given she hadn't even met Emhoff at the time and given who the GOP candidate is. I mean you definitely can try, it just probably won't work out the way you want it to.

We can certainly mock him about this. It makes you so, so upset - even though you had no trouble mocking Melania and other Trump family members. You seem to have conveniently forgotten that while you play the victim.

I don’t really care, do you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? Trump is running for President. He cheated and had affairs on all three of his wives, bragged about being able to commit sexual assault on a microphone and get away with it because he's a celebrity, and was found liable for sexual abuse this year.

Doug Emhoff is running for ... nothing lol. He isn't on the ballot. He is the husband of the person running for President. If first marriage ended decades ago because he cheated, it's irrelevant because it was not in his current relationship and decades before he met Harris.

Would we care if Melania cheated on previous relationship decades before she even met Donald Trump? No. We only should focus on Donald Trump having cheated on her and all his other wives instead since he (not Melania) is on the ballot.

This weak story makes me realize we should talk more about Trump cheating on all of his wives and being found liable for sexual abuse.

Of COURSE you would care and if that were the case, you would have used it as a bludgeon for the past 8 years. How laughable to pretend that you would simply have risen above. When has that ever happened?

As it is, I really couldn’t care less - but it sure is entertaining watching you twist yourself up in a pretzel because you can’t stand any negative press of any Democrat - or their spouse. Hypocrisy abounds on the left, as usual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is hilarious. So much spluttering from Democrats who clearly can dish it out (in spades) but can’t take a dose of their own medicine. Oh, and here’s CNN reporting on it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/03/politics/doug-emhoff-acknowledges-affair-during-first-marriage/index.html

What's hilarious is how dumb it is for the GOP attack Harris on this given she hadn't even met Emhoff at the time and given who the GOP candidate is. I mean you definitely can try, it just probably won't work out the way you want it to.

We can certainly mock him about this. It makes you so, so upset - even though you had no trouble mocking Melania and other Trump family members. You seem to have conveniently forgotten that while you play the victim.

Huh? Who cares?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

Well… they would certainly care about it if the man in question was a Republican. But since he’s not, no biggie.
DP

[Anonymous]

I just love the irony of MAGA trying to make a big deal out of this non-story about a non-candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?


Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.


A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

Feminist here. I don't care for several reasons.

1) He is not running for public office.

2) We don't know what the situation was regarding employment and "taking advantage". Maybe it was consensual. Maybe
she was no longer employed. We don't know exactly what happened. Heck, we don't know definitively if she was
pregnant.

3) If Harris knew about this and has a good relationship with him, who cares? It's their private life to live.

4) I am more angry that someone intruded on this woman's life by writing about this.

He is a domestic and foreign blackmail target, you dolt.

Is Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is hilarious. So much spluttering from Democrats who clearly can dish it out (in spades) but can’t take a dose of their own medicine. Oh, and here’s CNN reporting on it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/03/politics/doug-emhoff-acknowledges-affair-during-first-marriage/index.html

What's hilarious is how dumb it is for the GOP attack Harris on this given she hadn't even met Emhoff at the time and given who the GOP candidate is. I mean you definitely can try, it just probably won't work out the way you want it to.

We can certainly mock him about this. It makes you so, so upset - even though you had no trouble mocking Melania and other Trump family members. You seem to have conveniently forgotten that while you play the victim.

I don’t really care, do you?

The hypocrisy is the only reason I care. And the absolute fury coming from some of you hypocrites is also a sight to behold.

[Anonymous]

Story was circulating in elite circles in the District for years but never reported in the MSM. Daily Mail doing God’s work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

Well… they would certainly care about it if the man in question was a Republican. But since he’s not, no biggie.
DP

I am DEFINITELY never voting for him for office!! —Democrat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is hilarious. So much spluttering from Democrats who clearly can dish it out (in spades) but can’t take a dose of their own medicine. Oh, and here’s CNN reporting on it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/03/politics/doug-emhoff-acknowledges-affair-during-first-marriage/index.html

What's hilarious is how dumb it is for the GOP attack Harris on this given she hadn't even met Emhoff at the time and given who the GOP candidate is. I mean you definitely can try, it just probably won't work out the way you want it to.

We can certainly mock him about this. It makes you so, so upset - even though you had no trouble mocking Melania and other Trump family members. You seem to have conveniently forgotten that while you play the victim.

Huh? Who cares?

Those of you desperately writing long, overly earnest, hysterical screeds about how much this doesn’t matter certainly care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is a statement, Emhoff says he “took responsibility.”

What does that mean? Paid for an abortion? Paid off the mother?

Sounds like she had the kid. So I’d assume an NDA and multi-million settlement.

Wrong. There is no Doug Emhoff love child out there. Keep up.

Are you saying the child was killed/aborted — presumably he pressured her to do so? That’s troubling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is a statement, Emhoff says he “took responsibility.”

What does that mean? Paid for an abortion? Paid off the mother?

Sounds like she had the kid. So I’d assume an NDA and multi-million settlement.

Wrong. There is no Doug Emhoff love child out there. Keep up.

DP. And you know this how? All reports say she “didn’t keep the child.” That could mean a few different things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is hilarious. So much spluttering from Democrats who clearly can dish it out (in spades) but can’t take a dose of their own medicine. Oh, and here’s CNN reporting on it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/03/politics/doug-emhoff-acknowledges-affair-during-first-marriage/index.html

What's hilarious is how dumb it is for the GOP attack Harris on this given she hadn't even met Emhoff at the time and given who the GOP candidate is. I mean you definitely can try, it just probably won't work out the way you want it to.

We can certainly mock him about this. It makes you so, so upset - even though you had no trouble mocking Melania and other Trump family members. You seem to have conveniently forgotten that while you play the victim.

Huh? Who cares?

Those of you desperately writing long, overly earnest, hysterical screeds about how much this doesn’t matter certainly care.

You mean the guy who wrote the long thing about poor Melania and how she’s been persecuted? 🤣