Definitely not. But my sarcasm detector is completely broken in this thread. What percentage of these posters are trolls mocking the medically anxious? I suspect many are serious, but presumably this AI poster is a troll. Right? |
No disagreement here. |
I'm not sure it's the medical anxiety that is being mocked. |
Presumably this post is a troll, but while there's a future in AI in medicine, it isn't in replacing PCPs. The signal-to-noise ratio from patients is far too low for these to be able to make diagnoses from what they get from patients. And various incentives in the medical and legal systems would push these systems to diagnostic testing to a wildly impractical degree. The real potential is computer vision becoming much, much better than radiologists. |
Phrase it how you want. "Medically anxious" seemed like the gentlest way to describe some of these posters. What term would you use? |
Probably the ones they use for themselves. Not being sarcastic or snide here -- the gestalt of this trend of posts is not one that is generally well served by other people putting labels on it. |
Sure, but to convey a relatively obvious point that would turn a two-word description of a group into a paragraph, when that's not even the main point to convey. |
Funny I only trust doctors now. |
Which is what, exactly? |
That it is very hard to tell which posters really have these mental health issues impacting their ability to seek medical care, and which posters are writing absurd things to mock that first group. In other words, Poe's law. |
Fair enough. Probably just shows that this situation is so complex and mired in both misunderstandings and bad faith that of course sarcasm is going to be unclear. |