Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think people tend to talk past each other on this issue. I think it is simultaneously true that: 1. Open marriages work very well for a small group of people, who reasonably resent the social opprobrium against the practice and advocate for it because it works really well for them ; 2. Open marriages are a catastrophe for a much larger group of people; and 3. Normalizing open marriages will inevitably result in pressure on monogamous-preferring spouses who don’t want to open the marriage along the lines of “you are unreasonable not to open the marriage, it has gone mainstream and all the cool kids are doing it.” Yes they can say no, but it’s much harder to once the practice becomes widespread.
I’d say that this holds true for monogamous marriages as well - they work well for only a small group of people. Read the All or Nothing Marriage.
It's a lot easier for two unhappy people to maintain a partnership/union/whatever than it is for a chain of people.
I don't think many people are built for many years of monogamy. But I think far fewer are built for many years (or even months) of polyamory.
This is the truth. Monogamy is like democracy -- a terrible idea but better than the alternative.
At least as for as marriages with children are concerned. For people who don't have kids, and especially if they are both financially independent, I think a broader range of arrangements can work. With kids, monogamy is hard to beat.