MCPS Hires Nancy Navarro to Clean Up Its Messes and Fix Its Relationship Problems

[Anonymous]

Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

According to whom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

According to whom?

The turfers who post all these mcps conspiracy theories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

According to whom?

What organization hires people without some form of an employment agreement? How would you memorialize the salary or the job duties? There are organizations that do this. They all have weak governance, which small businesses can get away with but big organizations can’t. Not having an employment agreement would be worse than not disclosing the terms of an employment agreement that actually exists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

According to whom?

What organization hires people without some form of an employment agreement? How would you memorialize the salary or the job duties? There are organizations that do this. They all have weak governance, which small businesses can get away with but big organizations can’t. Not having an employment agreement would be worse than not disclosing the terms of an employment agreement that actually exists.

Of course, they have an agreement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

That seems more plausible than these wacky conspiracy theories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

That seems more plausible than these wacky conspiracy theories.

Except, with MCPS, there's so little transparency that conspiracy theories often prove to be true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

Or she’s working month to month for less than 25k so no single contract is more than $25k.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

That seems more plausible than these wacky conspiracy theories.

Except, with MCPS, there's so little transparency that conspiracy theories often prove to be true.

Not really but some people are dumb enough to fall for the constant barrage of gossip and false allegations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

Or she’s working month to month for less than 25k so no single contract is more than $25k.

LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

Or she’s working month to month for less than 25k so no single contract is more than $25k.

I heard she is getting $24,999/month!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

Or she’s working month to month for less than 25k so no single contract is more than $25k.

I heard she is getting $24,999/month!

You’re lying but it’s not out of the question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

Or she’s working month to month for less than 25k so no single contract is more than $25k.

I heard she is getting $24,999/month!

You’re lying but it’s not out of the question.

And requires BOE approval.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Navarro is supposedly hired under a contract. Policy is that the Board is supposed to approve contracts over $25k. So we need to look for her contract to show up in a BOE meeting.

But they also never voted on the JL contract for the Beidleman investigation and if you look at the legal fees report, they paid well over $100k in August to Jackson Lewis. So they don't care.

I think she is working for less than 25k then.

Or she’s working month to month for less than 25k so no single contract is more than $25k.

I heard she is getting $24,999/month!

You’re lying but it’s not out of the question.

And requires BOE approval.

They just stated that anything under $25k does not.