SAT/ACT single most predictive factor at Yale

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where is California's antiracist test that's replacing the SAT?


As soon as they find one where white kids can score as high as Asians, I’m sure they’ll roll it right out.


Interestingly, CA has spent a lot of time looking into tests to replace the “racist” SAT and ACT. All of the tests they looked into had similar racial gaps. The only gaps CA cares about is between black/Hispanic students and white students though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:1. Why is that Dean Coffin so profoundly unlikable?

2. Our NYC private is now advising submit if it's over 25% cut off

3. I'd submit a 1500 to any school in America.


Chicago private. CC also advising to submit if over 25%

NP. Makes sense to me. Felt like I was saying this all last year when the professionals were saying 50%. Essentially, if the score shows the kid is in the ballpark of the enrolled class before test optional (CDS 2020-21), it helps them show they can handle the academics.

Does anyone suppose that high test score kids (1500+) might do better in admissions this year than the crapshoot results of the last three years? Asking for a friend...


I don't know about better, but I do feel like the days of unhooked kids in middle class or wealthier zip codes going TO is over. Submit it or forget it.


There are so many kids who score 1500+ (or the ACT equivalent) that there just aren't enough spaces for them at the top schools.

Someone on here once posted that according to the Common App 2022 report, 76,000+ applicants applied to universities/colleges with an SAT score >1500 or ACT equivalent. There are an additional 98,000 in the 1400-1490 range. That's a lot of smart kids to place.


Your > 1500 data is inaccurate. The number is substantially lower that 76K individuals.


Hmm..It is the top 5 percent out of about 2 million individuals...so about right, I think


https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/understanding-sat-scores.pdf

Where did you get 95th %ile ... ??? Review the data at the link above, and let me know if that changes your opinion.


The number of individuals in a given year scoring 1500 or higher on the SAT, or 34 or higher on the ACT, is probably close to 32,000 in total. I know there's a desperate narrative floating around that there are more qualified applicants for T20 schools than seats available, but that's simply untrue.


Yes but your analysis doesn’t account for super scoring where kids might not ever get over 1500 on a single test, but might when you only consider their best verbal and math score over several tests. Frankly, I think colleges should bring back the required testing but stop superscoring.


100% agree re: ending the super scoring practice - and I also think second, third, fourth, etc. administrations should also not be accepted by colleges and universities. One and done. That should also count for the PSAT. If you take the PSAT9 or PSAT10, you shouldn't be eligible to qualify for NMSQT recognition.

However, the individual making the case for the higher number referenced a %ile. There's no way a %ile could lead you to a number in this case since the practice of super scoring isn't universally utilized by all colleges and universities.


NP: 76k applicants >1500 (includes ACT equivalent) is correct according to the Common App.

It’s not a narrative/myth. The data is available. See appendix A page 11: https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ca.research.publish/Research_Briefs_2022/2022_12_09_Apps_Per_Applicant_ResearchBrief.pdf
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where is California's antiracist test that's replacing the SAT?


As soon as they find one where white kids can score as high as Asians, I’m sure they’ll roll it right out.



Don't think it's the whites that are complaining about test scores
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:1. Why is that Dean Coffin so profoundly unlikable?

2. Our NYC private is now advising submit if it's over 25% cut off

3. I'd submit a 1500 to any school in America.


Chicago private. CC also advising to submit if over 25%

NP. Makes sense to me. Felt like I was saying this all last year when the professionals were saying 50%. Essentially, if the score shows the kid is in the ballpark of the enrolled class before test optional (CDS 2020-21), it helps them show they can handle the academics.

Does anyone suppose that high test score kids (1500+) might do better in admissions this year than the crapshoot results of the last three years? Asking for a friend...


I don't know about better, but I do feel like the days of unhooked kids in middle class or wealthier zip codes going TO is over. Submit it or forget it.


There are so many kids who score 1500+ (or the ACT equivalent) that there just aren't enough spaces for them at the top schools.

Someone on here once posted that according to the Common App 2022 report, 76,000+ applicants applied to universities/colleges with an SAT score >1500 or ACT equivalent. There are an additional 98,000 in the 1400-1490 range. That's a lot of smart kids to place.


Your > 1500 data is inaccurate. The number is substantially lower that 76K individuals.


Hmm..It is the top 5 percent out of about 2 million individuals...so about right, I think


https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/understanding-sat-scores.pdf

Where did you get 95th %ile ... ??? Review the data at the link above, and let me know if that changes your opinion.


The number of individuals in a given year scoring 1500 or higher on the SAT, or 34 or higher on the ACT, is probably close to 32,000 in total. I know there's a desperate narrative floating around that there are more qualified applicants for T20 schools than seats available, but that's simply untrue.


Yes but your analysis doesn’t account for super scoring where kids might not ever get over 1500 on a single test, but might when you only consider their best verbal and math score over several tests. Frankly, I think colleges should bring back the required testing but stop superscoring.


100% agree re: ending the super scoring practice - and I also think second, third, fourth, etc. administrations should also not be accepted by colleges and universities. One and done. That should also count for the PSAT. If you take the PSAT9 or PSAT10, you shouldn't be eligible to qualify for NMSQT recognition.

However, the individual making the case for the higher number referenced a %ile. There's no way a %ile could lead you to a number in this case since the practice of super scoring isn't universally utilized by all colleges and universities.


NP: 76k applicants >1500 (includes ACT equivalent) is correct according to the Common App.

It’s not a narrative/myth. The data is available. See appendix A page 11: https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ca.research.publish/Research_Briefs_2022/2022_12_09_Apps_Per_Applicant_ResearchBrief.pdf


I don’t believe that a superscored 1500 / 34 is the same as a composite 1500 / 34. I also don’t think a 1500 / 34 on any administration after the first one is the same as a one-and-done 1500 / 34. And, yes, I understand that many colleges and universities seem not to agree with those views - at this time, anyway.
Anonymous
It’s GPAs Not Standardized Tests That Predict College Success

High school GPAs were found to be five times stronger than ACT scores at predicting graduation rates, and that the effect of GPAs was consistent across schools, unlike ACT scores.Jan 29, 2020

The findings overturn the conventional wisdom that, while GPAs vary widely between high schools, standardized test results are a more objective indicator of whether a student is ready for college

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2020/01/29/its-gpas-not-standardized-tests-that-predict-college-success/?sh=4bcafc9932bd



WHAT ACTUALLY PREDICTS COLLEGE SUCCESS?
by Bettina Weil | Mar 16, 2021 | 0 comments

In nearly all the research that's been done on student success in college, the most predictive indicator, time and again, is a student's high school GPA.Mar 16, 2021

https://weilcollegeadvising.com/what-actually-predicts-college-success/#:~:text=In%20nearly%20all%20the%20research,a%20student's%20high%20school%20GPA.



Research Finds that High School GPAs Are Stronger Predictors of College Graduation than ACT Scores

Research Finds that High School GPAs Are Stronger Predictors
of College Graduation than ACT Scores
WASHINGTON, D.C., January 28, 2020—

Students’ high school grade point averages are five times stronger than their ACT scores at predicting college graduation, according to a new study published today in Educational Researcher, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Educational Research Association.

The authors of the new study, Elaine M. Allensworth and Kallie Clark, both of the University of Chicago, also found that the predictive power of GPAs is consistent across high schools. The relationship between ACT scores and college graduation depends on which high school a student attends; at many high schools there is no connection between students’ ACT scores and eventual college graduation.

“It was surprising not only to see that there was no relationship between ACT scores and college graduation at some high schools, but also to see that at many high schools the relationship was negative among students with the highest test scores,” said Allensworth, who is the director of the University of Chicago Consortium on School Research.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:1. Why is that Dean Coffin so profoundly unlikable?

2. Our NYC private is now advising submit if it's over 25% cut off

3. I'd submit a 1500 to any school in America.


Chicago private. CC also advising to submit if over 25%

NP. Makes sense to me. Felt like I was saying this all last year when the professionals were saying 50%. Essentially, if the score shows the kid is in the ballpark of the enrolled class before test optional (CDS 2020-21), it helps them show they can handle the academics.

Does anyone suppose that high test score kids (1500+) might do better in admissions this year than the crapshoot results of the last three years? Asking for a friend...


I don't know about better, but I do feel like the days of unhooked kids in middle class or wealthier zip codes going TO is over. Submit it or forget it.


There are so many kids who score 1500+ (or the ACT equivalent) that there just aren't enough spaces for them at the top schools.

Someone on here once posted that according to the Common App 2022 report, 76,000+ applicants applied to universities/colleges with an SAT score >1500 or ACT equivalent. There are an additional 98,000 in the 1400-1490 range. That's a lot of smart kids to place.


Your > 1500 data is inaccurate. The number is substantially lower that 76K individuals.


Hmm..It is the top 5 percent out of about 2 million individuals...so about right, I think


https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/understanding-sat-scores.pdf

Where did you get 95th %ile ... ??? Review the data at the link above, and let me know if that changes your opinion.


The number of individuals in a given year scoring 1500 or higher on the SAT, or 34 or higher on the ACT, is probably close to 32,000 in total. I know there's a desperate narrative floating around that there are more qualified applicants for T20 schools than seats available, but that's simply untrue.


Yes but your analysis doesn’t account for super scoring where kids might not ever get over 1500 on a single test, but might when you only consider their best verbal and math score over several tests. Frankly, I think colleges should bring back the required testing but stop superscoring.


100% agree re: ending the super scoring practice - and I also think second, third, fourth, etc. administrations should also not be accepted by colleges and universities. One and done. That should also count for the PSAT. If you take the PSAT9 or PSAT10, you shouldn't be eligible to qualify for NMSQT recognition.

However, the individual making the case for the higher number referenced a %ile. There's no way a %ile could lead you to a number in this case since the practice of super scoring isn't universally utilized by all colleges and universities.


NP: 76k applicants >1500 (includes ACT equivalent) is correct according to the Common App.

It’s not a narrative/myth. The data is available. See appendix A page 11: https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ca.research.publish/Research_Briefs_2022/2022_12_09_Apps_Per_Applicant_ResearchBrief.pdf


I don’t believe that a superscored 1500 / 34 is the same as a composite 1500 / 34. I also don’t think a 1500 / 34 on any administration after the first one is the same as a one-and-done 1500 / 34. And, yes, I understand that many colleges and universities seem not to agree with those views - at this time, anyway.


I also think superscoring should end. However, the majority of T200 schools and many schools that use the Common App disagree. Only a handful of schools discussed on this board don’t superscore. College Board certainly loves the revenue! Don’t see any incentive for colleges to change.

For now that means approximately 76k students are competing for seats at T20/30 schools and 98k additional students in the broader pool of top schools PLUS TO applicants.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:More evidence says high school performance is the strongest indicator.


Agree - very credible research suggests GPA is x5 times more important than test scores in predicting future college success.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2020/01/29/its-gpas-not-standardized-tests-that-predict-college-success/?sh=4bcafc9932bd



https://weilcollegeadvising.com/what-actually-predicts-college-success/#:~:text=In%20nearly%20all%20the%20research,a%20student's%20high%20school%20GPA.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More evidence says high school performance is the strongest indicator.


Says the parent whose kid has a 4.4 GPA and is a “bad test taker.” LOL


Yep. The "bad test taker" crowd will be out in full force dissing that dean fella! That's the only outcome they can't buy their way to, so they don't want it but pretend it helps the 'underprivileged' they pretend to care about.



DP

Nope - My DC had both very high test scores and GPA that they worked very hard for. They won awards in STEM field at undergrad and post grad level but their supervisor pointed out it was their work ethic that set them apart.

I place much more store by consistent hard work ethic: Unsurprisingly, credible studies support that GPA is much more important than test scores for predicting future college success.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More evidence says high school performance is the strongest indicator.


Says the parent whose kid has a 4.4 GPA and is a “bad test taker.” LOL


Yep. The "bad test taker" crowd will be out in full force dissing that dean fella! That's the only outcome they can't buy their way to, so they don't want it but pretend it helps the 'underprivileged' they pretend to care about.


I’m a parent of a good student bad test taker. Glad you’re amused . Why do you care so much??
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More evidence says high school performance is the strongest indicator.


Agree - very credible research suggests GPA is x5 times more important than test scores in predicting future college success.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2020/01/29/its-gpas-not-standardized-tests-that-predict-college-success/?sh=4bcafc9932bd



https://weilcollegeadvising.com/what-actually-predicts-college-success/#:~:text=In%20nearly%20all%20the%20research,a%20student's%20high%20school%20GPA.


Rank order these students (based on your belief that GPA is 5x more relevant than standardized testing, or otherwise).

A. 4.00 u/w GPA (5 APs) + 1400 / 32
B. 4.00 u/w GPA (8 APs) + T/O
C. 3.85 u/w GPA (10 APs) + 1500 / 34
D. 3.85 u/w GPA (12 APs) + T/O
E. 3.70 u/w GPA (15 APs) + 1600 / 36

For me, it’s C, E, A, D, B. I could also go with E, C, A, D, B.

Curious to see how you rank them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More evidence says high school performance is the strongest indicator.


Agree - very credible research suggests GPA is x5 times more important than test scores in predicting future college success.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2020/01/29/its-gpas-not-standardized-tests-that-predict-college-success/?sh=4bcafc9932bd



https://weilcollegeadvising.com/what-actually-predicts-college-success/#:~:text=In%20nearly%20all%20the%20research,a%20student's%20high%20school%20GPA.


Rank order these students (based on your belief that GPA is 5x more relevant than standardized testing, or otherwise).

A. 4.00 u/w GPA (5 APs) + 1400 / 32
B. 4.00 u/w GPA (8 APs) + T/O
C. 3.85 u/w GPA (10 APs) + 1500 / 34
D. 3.85 u/w GPA (12 APs) + T/O
E. 3.70 u/w GPA (15 APs) + 1600 / 36

For me, it’s C, E, A, D, B. I could also go with E, C, A, D, B.

Curious to see how you rank them.


Every piece of actual research about this issue accepts that there are SAT/ACT scores lower than 1400/32 and u/w GPAs lower than 3.7.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More evidence says high school performance is the strongest indicator.


Agree - very credible research suggests GPA is x5 times more important than test scores in predicting future college success.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2020/01/29/its-gpas-not-standardized-tests-that-predict-college-success/?sh=4bcafc9932bd



https://weilcollegeadvising.com/what-actually-predicts-college-success/#:~:text=In%20nearly%20all%20the%20research,a%20student's%20high%20school%20GPA.


Where is the credible research there? A Forbes puff piece with no link to an actual report or data or an opinion price from “weilcollegeadvising.com”?

Contrast this to the UC regents report (very carefully researched, using millions of student records) and all of the research coming from Kuncel and Sackett from UMN using data from millions of students across many schools.

The reality is the people saying that standardized test scores should be considered are the moderate/compromise position. If people were arguing that only test scores should count and we should ignore HS GPA despite ample evidence that it predicts college success people would think you were insane; that’s essentially the same position the “eliminate standardized testing” people are taking. Most rational people know that standardized testing isn’t the whole picture, but can add a very valuable data point in assessing college readiness.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More evidence says high school performance is the strongest indicator.


Agree - very credible research suggests GPA is x5 times more important than test scores in predicting future college success.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2020/01/29/its-gpas-not-standardized-tests-that-predict-college-success/?sh=4bcafc9932bd



https://weilcollegeadvising.com/what-actually-predicts-college-success/#:~:text=In%20nearly%20all%20the%20research,a%20student's%20high%20school%20GPA.


They’re both reporting on the same study. This study looked at ~17k kids who went to 4-year colleges. These 17k kids had an average ACT of 20 and a 2.7 HS GPA. They binned everyone with a 30+ ACT into the same bin, and there weren’t many students at any of the extremes. I also didn’t see anything in the paper that talked about statistical significance of the results, or error bars. They also didn’t look at major for the students. While this isn’t a worthless result, it’s a very small and underpowered study compared to some of the studies with millions of students, their actual GPSs and majors at the schools they went to vs. “percentage graduating in 6 years” like this study.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Problem is that GPA grading is inconsistent. A 4.0 W GPA from TJ is equivalent to a 4.5 W GPA from any other HS in NoVA.

Hence the SAT matters. If you score over 700 in Math, surely your Math skills are adequate for college level course work. I dont need to see anything else.


+1. Some high schools are more rigorous so the GPA can not be compared even in the same county.
Anonymous
What if instead of TO schools just had a minimum test score and then didn’t consider it further?
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: