I don't see why that's the preferable outcome versus having TJ continue to be a school where applicants are evaluated based on merit against standardized assessments. Sure there are preening narcissists, but just because a preening narcissist likes the taste of a banana, doesn't change the fact that bananas are delicious and healthy. There is a place in our society for merit-based identification and advancement of young scholars. There may be other goals that we as a society want to achieve and we can have those as additional programs. Let TJ remain doing what it has done so well as to earn the top rank among the nation's high schools. |
DP. The declining application numbers are an indicator that something needs improving at TJ, the "top HS in the nation". |
That's not a bad idea, for a different educational program. TJ's goal is to identify and educate the best students based on demonstrated capability. TJ is not a remedial learning center for under-served communities. |
It's okay for the best college systems in the country but not for TJ? |
I would start, by having some kind non preppable surprise test, then. |
Very strange post. You seem to agree that the numbers of Black and Latino students are very low at TJ but then you call efforts to address this "racist". I'm not sure what you're trying to argue. Just everything? |
Not really. TJ was seen as an option for many families who bought homes in neighborhoods served by less than stellar high schools. FCPS has gone to great lengths to strengthen the curriculum offered at base schools, expanding AAP services, to the point where many of those families no longer saw the need to apply to TJ. Also, Basis opened its school location in Tysons, offering a rigorous and challenging curriculum that has also earned Basis the distinction of being among the highest-ranked high schools in the nation. In other words, TJ got additional competition, and thus reduced application numbers. |
Not sure what you find strange. Efforts to address the achievement of black and Latino students are needed, but they cannot be based on racist policies. Or are you arguing that the only way we can help black and Latino students is to rely on racist discrimination aginst Asians? |
Numerically, any increase in admitted Black and Latino students will result in fewer admitted Asian students. They increased the class size so that the decrease was offset somewhat. You're saying that any change in numbers will be racist. That's very strange. |
We are not the ones who set the new rules and then texted that they seemed anti Asian. Ask Abrar what she meant. |
All tests are preparable. That's the definition of any meaningful test - which is to test relevant knowledge or ability, which in turn is a reflection of how one has gained such knowledge or ability through learning and practice. Reading a history book to study the subject that will be covered on an exam is prepping. Learning how to solve geometry problems is prepping for geometry tests. Reading a novel and writing a book report is prepping for tests of reading comprehension. There is no such thing as a non-preparable test of relevant knowledge or skill. |
Again, as has been said numerous times in this thread, disparate impact alone is not an issue. Without racist intent or explicitly racist policies, a new admission policy that resulted in lower Asian students would not have been challenged on racist grounds. |
Aptitude tests are not supposed to be prepped for (but people do it anyway). I'm pointing this out because your post is incomplete. |
That's not what PP is saying. You're putting words in her mouth, trying to make her sound sensible. |
Please outline the path for that to happen expeditiously and in a manner that, you know, actually allows the idiots on this School Board to pay some attention to the other 97% of kids in FCPS. |