Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids

[Anonymous]

Sarah Jessica Parker, Cameron Crow & Nancy Wilson, Sonia Kruger, Tina Malone, Naomi Campbell(she's a maybe), etc have all used egg donors. Jennifer could, too, if she wanted/decides to. Many agencies have facial recognition software to find donors who resemble the intended parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How brave of her to come forward with this story. Years of not good enough to be a real woman and the perception by most if you miscarriage or can’t have children you’re not a woman.

This incredible, beautiful, sexy, strong woman tells her story.

How much longer with this obsession with being "sexy", it's really ridiculous.

She might be asexual or frigid. Plenty of women lose their drive in their 40s.

She seems like a workaholic desperate to remain relevant.

If I had her money, I’d retire and dabble in charity.

She seems to prefer to be naked on magazine covers which is an obvious strategy to boost interest and preserve her brand. She’s clearly focused on making money through her various ventures. That’s fine. Her choice. But she’s neither a victim nor a martyr.

Ok that’s really cynical. She’s like: Let me tap into that failed ivf childless female demographic!! Come on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How brave of her to come forward with this story. Years of not good enough to be a real woman and the perception by most if you miscarriage or can’t have children you’re not a woman.

This incredible, beautiful, sexy, strong woman tells her story.

How much longer with this obsession with being "sexy", it's really ridiculous.

She might be asexual or frigid. Plenty of women lose their drive in their 40s.

She seems like a workaholic desperate to remain relevant.

If I had her money, I’d retire and dabble in charity.

She seems to prefer to be naked on magazine covers which is an obvious strategy to boost interest and preserve her brand. She’s clearly focused on making money through her various ventures. That’s fine. Her choice. But she’s neither a victim nor a martyr.

Please stop.

[Anonymous]

She's now come out and said she never adopted because she "wanted her own DNA." Comes across as kind of cold, thoughts?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15189415/Jennifer-Aniston-says-never-wanted-adopt-following-20-year-battle-baby-want-DNA.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's now come out and said she never adopted because she "wanted her own DNA." Comes across as kind of cold, thoughts?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15189415/Jennifer-Aniston-says-never-wanted-adopt-following-20-year-battle-baby-want-DNA.html

It rubs me the wrong way, especially since she has at least one close friend who's adopted (Sandy B), but I guess she's entitled to feel the way she feels?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's now come out and said she never adopted because she "wanted her own DNA." Comes across as kind of cold, thoughts?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15189415/Jennifer-Aniston-says-never-wanted-adopt-following-20-year-battle-baby-want-DNA.html

Plenty of men say this.

[Anonymous]

I'm not really sure what she's supposed to respond if people are going to keep asking why she didn't adopt, which is intrusive. If a person has money and wanted a child and didn't adopt then pretty much the reason is going to be that they wanted a child with their own DNA, that's normal. I respect her not going down the surrogacy route.

[Anonymous]

It became a thing because Brad Pitt went on to have all these kids why she did not. She did not comment on the topic for a very long time. We all have our breaking point and eventually she opened that door to talk about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's now come out and said she never adopted because she "wanted her own DNA." Comes across as kind of cold, thoughts?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15189415/Jennifer-Aniston-says-never-wanted-adopt-following-20-year-battle-baby-want-DNA.html

It rubs me the wrong way, especially since she has at least one close friend who's adopted (Sandy B), but I guess she's entitled to feel the way she feels?

Yes. The concept of one's own DNA is a little weird to me but parenthood is huge and people can want what they want.

[Anonymous]

I think adopting comes with many challenges and it's reasonable to decide you don't want it for whatever reason. She probably didn't feel comfortable saying that precisely because she has close friends with adopted kids. Not that bio kids can't be equally challenging!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think adopting comes with many challenges and it's reasonable to decide you don't want it for whatever reason. She probably didn't feel comfortable saying that precisely because she has close friends with adopted kids. Not that bio kids can't be equally challenging!

Maybe she read the court cases coming out of donors and that scared her off too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think adopting comes with many challenges and it's reasonable to decide you don't want it for whatever reason. She probably didn't feel comfortable saying that precisely because she has close friends with adopted kids. Not that bio kids can't be equally challenging!

Maybe she read the court cases coming out of donors and that scared her off too.

What are you referring to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think adopting comes with many challenges and it's reasonable to decide you don't want it for whatever reason. She probably didn't feel comfortable saying that precisely because she has close friends with adopted kids. Not that bio kids can't be equally challenging!

She also said more than once that she didn't want to parent alone. I would be worried about an adopted or egg donor child only having me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really sure what she's supposed to respond if people are going to keep asking why she didn't adopt, which is intrusive. If a person has money and wanted a child and didn't adopt then pretty much the reason is going to be that they wanted a child with their own DNA, that's normal. I respect her not going down the surrogacy route.

I suspect she never really wanted a baby.

The reality is any woman desperate to be a mother finds a way to become a mother. She has all the resources to get a baby. If she truly wanted one, she could have had one or gotten one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's now come out and said she never adopted because she "wanted her own DNA." Comes across as kind of cold, thoughts?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15189415/Jennifer-Aniston-says-never-wanted-adopt-following-20-year-battle-baby-want-DNA.html

Plenty of people feel this way. They just aren't pestered until they say it, or what they say is not reported in the press.

GMAFB.