DCI takes the kids from its feeder immersion schools. They might take a handful of kids not in feeders and that handful will be more competitive each year. Most CH families who don’t get into Basis or Latin are not getting into DCI. In fact, you have a much higher probability of getting into Latin and Basis than DCI. |
Also want to add, if you want any chance at DCI, you need to look at getting your kid in at the charter immersion schools. BTW there is a good contingency of CH families who go to Mundo Verde because they have a shuttle to the school from CH. |
In theory, but not true this year. We got off the DCI wait list late this past summer with a number we never thought would work in the spring. DCI went deep into wait lists for all three languages this year. No idea if it will happen again though. We didn't get off the BASIS wait list last year or this year. |
I don’t see how academics will improve without a lot of UMC Asians/Jews moving into the area. The academic standards of the whites on the Hill is shockingly low. |
I am PP that is OOB for Maury. I’m not talking about the building. I’m talking about the school culture. The expectations of students, the behavior of the teachers, the attitude of the administration, the behavior of parents toward each other, etc. If you think you can move heaven and earth and change all of these things in the limited time your kid is at the school, good luck to you. |
School culture isn’t imported into the school via the student body. My family is the same as it always was. However, the experience we have now that we moved schools is completely different. |
Yes, but did all of the rest of your old school move along with you? That's the point. You're dropping into a new school culture, so it's different even though you alone are the same. Maury "culture" was still basically the same during the temporary relocation to E-H during construction, because the students and families were the same. |
|
Strongly disagree. I’m a teacher and have spent time in many educational settings. School culture is SET and MODELED by the adults in the building in explicit and nuanced ways. It is malleable and can change ( for better or worse ) in short order. School culture is created through expectations and behaviors within the school, it is not dependent on the individual families or students coming to the school. It’s the same way your office or workplace sets a tone or creates a culture no matter who the individual employees are. |
In theory. Here on a Capitol Hill, in public schools with strong UMC buy-in by all races, school cultures are invariably acceptable, if not good or great. In schools without strong UMC buy-in, school cultures are all over the map and a happy atmosphere can't compensate for weak or middling academics due to demographics/DCPS' aversion to test-in middle school programs. I don't doubt that Jefferson's school culture is good, because the school's leadership seems to be first-rate. Even so, UMC buy-in remains weak. |
Yes, in terms of the lottery, BASIS is getting tougher to get into every year. Latin is hard to to get into but for different reasons, and will be even harder now for non-at-risk. DCI seems a lot easier to get into. |
Talk about moving the goal posts. Now Jefferson is a "bad" school because of Eastern. Ok... |
I don't disagree that the adults working in the building are important, but it seems insane to me to dismiss the role of parents--and students' home lives more broadly--on the way things are at school. But I'm happy to have a teacher say that, because frankly it seems that many administrators (and some educators) tend to blame students and parents when things aren't good. "We can only do so much inside the school!" |
IME, UMC families bring a strong customer service attitude that affects school culture in negative ways. This is evident at schools across the city, not just CH, but it’s very strong at schools like Brent and Maury.
As individual families we have not done enough to demand that DCPS stop funding their bloated central office in favor of providing resources to schools that really need it—resources like librarians and social workers and buildings that have functioning HVAC. Getting rid of IMPACT which penalizes teachers who work in Title I schools. I get that it’s hard to see the forest for the trees or what an individual can do to make a difference—especially when you have to make a choice for your kid. But the idea that we bear no responsibility when our choices clearly perpetuate privilege is just wrong. |
interesting perspective. but I don’t think it’s realistic to expect parents to do anything that isn’t in their perceived self interest, unfortunately. I almost think all the demanding parents should be required to take a turn on the LSAT so they can get some degree of insight into all the different factors that go into running a school - and understand why the admins can’t just drop everything for the parents’ pet project or pet peeve. |