Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's only been two days of FBI investigation. Imagine what else is going to come out.

Your guy is TOAST. Trump hates drunks!

The FBI is wrapping up. They're just about done.

Highly unlikely. But in any event, The New York Times and other investigative media outlets are still very busy and keep exposing him as a liar - forget the sexual assault charges. The country is finding out he is unfit and he now has the lowest public approval rating of any SC nominee ever.

I read the NY Times every day and am truly shocked that such an unbiased news source would continue to stay busy trying to find anything they can that might possibly bring him down. Shocked!

+1
They are gleefully looking under any and every stone, trying to manufacture something where there is nothing. I knew NYT was left-leaning, but this is absurd. Really detracts from whatever credibility they had left.

Looking under every stone is their job. The Senate Committee sure as hell doesn’t want to.

Manufacturing incidents that are either irrelevant or didn't occur is not their job. They need to stand down until the FBI finishes their investigation, and then only publish verifiable FACTS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's only been two days of FBI investigation. Imagine what else is going to come out.

Your guy is TOAST. Trump hates drunks!

The FBI is wrapping up. They're just about done.

Highly unlikely. But in any event, The New York Times and other investigative media outlets are still very busy and keep exposing him as a liar - forget the sexual assault charges. The country is finding out he is unfit and he now has the lowest public approval rating of any SC nominee ever.

I read the NY Times every day and am truly shocked that such an unbiased news source would continue to stay busy trying to find anything they can that might possibly bring him down. Shocked!

+1
They are gleefully looking under any and every stone, trying to manufacture something where there is nothing. I knew NYT was left-leaning, but this is absurd. Really detracts from whatever credibility they had left.

Looking under every stone is their job. The Senate Committee sure as hell doesn’t want to.

Manufacturing incidents that are either irrelevant or didn't occur is not their job. They need to stand down until the FBI finishes their investigation, and then only publish verifiable FACTS.

The letter is verified. It's fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Letter from Ford’s former boyfriend. It’s pretty damning.

They dated for 6 yrs, never told of sex assault, Ford coached friend on taking polygraph, flew frequently w/o expressing any fear of flying/tight spaces/limited exits. Doesn’t want to b/c “involved”.

Very interesting. And a lot more relevant than some stupid beach week letter, which so far, has no source.

What are you talking about? The beach week letter directly contradicts his testimony. That is very relevant.

In what way does it contradict his testimony??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s Bart after all!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After all that has come out in the past couple weeks, I have changed my mind about Dr. Ford and her testimony.

I have thought all along that she had a case of mistaken identify because of trauma she suffered as a youth.

I don’t believe that any longer. I now believe she is making it all up. Why did she do this? I don’t know. But, because she first revealed this in couple’s therapy, she may have been desperate for an reason to attribute her behavior to, and this was an easy explanation. And, as the lie went on, it became more complicated, but she went with the lie to save her marriage.

Just my thoughts.

From the moment her redacted letter was published, you thought she was mistaken about Kavanaugh but was right about Mark Judge? Or did you only think this after Kavanaugh began to float the idea of mistaken identity, after Whalen came up with the elaborate doppelganger theory?

I thought it from the moment she made her allegations and Kavanaugh proclaimed his innocence. Even before Kavanaugh said anything about mistaken identity. The Whelan stuff is crap.

But, not any more. I think she is lying. And, really good at it. I think her psychology training has helped with that.

DP. I don't know if she's lying or not, but I've certainly been giving her psychology background some thought. It seems her expertise is in exactly the kinds of situations she claims to be in - sexual assault trauma. She was eager to offer her professional thoughts on why some memories are buried, etc. It's almost as if she has created the perfect, textbook case of sexual assault/suppressed memories, etc. I'd find her more credible if her background was in something completely irrelevant, like accounting or IT, etc. Just something that doesn't look like she's spouting from a psychology textbook about her own situation.

You don't know too many people with Psych PhDs do you? I am one. This stuff is taught in multiple courses at the grad and undergrad levels. Most people who earn PhDs teach at some point in their career (either as a grad school TA or afterward as a professor) and have to teach this to others. When we talk about this stuff to other people we sound like we're spouting from a textbook because we are! We know this stuff like the back of our hand from years of being immersed in the field... teaching courses, reading research, talking to colleagues, going to conferences. You don't have to be an expert in trauma memory to know about the things she's talked about. I'm not an expert on that topic and I could have told you all of what she said if some random person had asked me about trauma memories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After all that has come out in the past couple weeks, I have changed my mind about Dr. Ford and her testimony.

I have thought all along that she had a case of mistaken identify because of trauma she suffered as a youth.

I don’t believe that any longer. I now believe she is making it all up. Why did she do this? I don’t know. But, because she first revealed this in couple’s therapy, she may have been desperate for an reason to attribute her behavior to, and this was an easy explanation. And, as the lie went on, it became more complicated, but she went with the lie to save her marriage.

Just my thoughts.

there is literally more evidence that brett kavanaugh snorted cocaine with hookers then there is for that.

[Anonymous]

The investigation is a waste of time because the Republicans are going to vote to confirm, they don’t care that he lied unde oath, they don’t care if he attacked a woman, they only care that he is not only conservative but that he will be partisan. We simply need to vote the Republicans out.

[Anonymous]

He did a better job of it than Ketterer, that's for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

THE BEACH WEEK LETTER HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY NONE OTHER THAN BRETT KAVANAUGH.

"Through his lawyers, Judge Kavanaugh declined to comment for this article, other than to say of his letter: “This is a note I wrote to organize ‘Beach Week’ in the summer of 1983.” "

Excerpt from underground newspaper at Georgetown Prep, written by BK's friend MJ:

Well I’ll be....

All of these letters from high school are amusing, but they have little to do with someone being appointed to a position such as a scj.
Sure, if someone lies you won’t even pass a security clearance and that disqualifies you.
But being an irresponsible imbecile - within the bounds of our laws - doesn’t disqualify you and it’s not terribly shocking.
These letters are just dumb kid stuff.

I’m gonna go burn my teen letters that were filled with incredible stupidity, irresponsibility and really bad mean jokes.
Burn baby burn!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The investigation is a waste of time because the Republicans are going to vote to confirm, they don’t care that he lied unde oath, they don’t care if he attacked a woman, they only care that he is not only conservative but that he will be partisan. We simply need to vote the Republicans out.

I'm just sure you mean, ALLEGEDY attacked a woman. Funny how that one little word changes things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After all that has come out in the past couple weeks, I have changed my mind about Dr. Ford and her testimony.

I have thought all along that she had a case of mistaken identify because of trauma she suffered as a youth.

I don’t believe that any longer. I now believe she is making it all up. Why did she do this? I don’t know. But, because she first revealed this in couple’s therapy, she may have been desperate for an reason to attribute her behavior to, and this was an easy explanation. And, as the lie went on, it became more complicated, but she went with the lie to save her marriage.

Just my thoughts.

From the moment her redacted letter was published, you thought she was mistaken about Kavanaugh but was right about Mark Judge? Or did you only think this after Kavanaugh began to float the idea of mistaken identity, after Whalen came up with the elaborate doppelganger theory?

I thought it from the moment she made her allegations and Kavanaugh proclaimed his innocence. Even before Kavanaugh said anything about mistaken identity. The Whelan stuff is crap.

But, not any more. I think she is lying. And, really good at it. I think her psychology training has helped with that.

DP. I don't know if she's lying or not, but I've certainly been giving her psychology background some thought. It seems her expertise is in exactly the kinds of situations she claims to be in - sexual assault trauma. She was eager to offer her professional thoughts on why some memories are buried, etc. It's almost as if she has created the perfect, textbook case of sexual assault/suppressed memories, etc. I'd find her more credible if her background was in something completely irrelevant, like accounting or IT, etc. Just something that doesn't look like she's spouting from a psychology textbook about her own situation.

You don't know too many people with Psych PhDs do you? I am one. This stuff is taught in multiple courses at the grad and undergrad levels. Most people who earn PhDs teach at some point in their career (either as a grad school TA or afterward as a professor) and have to teach this to others. When we talk about this stuff to other people we sound like we're spouting from a textbook because we are! We know this stuff like the back of our hand from years of being immersed in the field... teaching courses, reading research, talking to colleagues, going to conferences. You don't have to be an expert in trauma memory to know about the things she's talked about. I'm not an expert on that topic and I could have told you all of what she said if some random person had asked me about trauma memories.

My father has a psych phd. Agree with everything you wrote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

THE BEACH WEEK LETTER HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY NONE OTHER THAN BRETT KAVANAUGH.

"Through his lawyers, Judge Kavanaugh declined to comment for this article, other than to say of his letter: “This is a note I wrote to organize ‘Beach Week’ in the summer of 1983.” "

Excerpt from underground newspaper at Georgetown Prep, written by BK's friend MJ:

Well I’ll be....

All of these letters from high school are amusing, but they have little to do with someone being appointed to a position such as a scj.
Sure, if someone lies you won’t even pass a security clearance and that disqualifies you.
But being an irresponsible imbecile - within the bounds of our laws - doesn’t disqualify you and it’s not terribly shocking.
These letters are just dumb kid stuff.

I’m gonna go burn my teen letters that were filled with incredible stupidity, irresponsibility and really bad mean jokes.
Burn baby burn!!

+1
I remember looking through all my high school stuff years ago and being incredulous at the kinds of things we talked about, wrote notes about, drew pictures of (!). I threw all of that stuff away. I find it hard to take people seriously who place so much credence in someone's high school antics (beyond rape or murder, of course - neither of which we're talking about).

[Anonymous]

Inside Edition went to the Potomac Safeway?? Wow - exciting.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.insideedition.com/maryland-house-where-christine-blasey-ford-was-allegedly-assaulted-47249%3famp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

THE BEACH WEEK LETTER HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY NONE OTHER THAN BRETT KAVANAUGH.

"Through his lawyers, Judge Kavanaugh declined to comment for this article, other than to say of his letter: “This is a note I wrote to organize ‘Beach Week’ in the summer of 1983.” "

Excerpt from underground newspaper at Georgetown Prep, written by BK's friend MJ:

Well I’ll be....

All of these letters from high school are amusing, but they have little to do with someone being appointed to a position such as a scj.
Sure, if someone lies you won’t even pass a security clearance and that disqualifies you.
But being an irresponsible imbecile - within the bounds of our laws - doesn’t disqualify you and it’s not terribly shocking.
These letters are just dumb kid stuff.

I’m gonna go burn my teen letters that were filled with incredible stupidity, irresponsibility and really bad mean jokes.
Burn baby burn!!

+1
I remember looking through all my high school stuff years ago and being incredulous at the kinds of things we talked about, wrote notes about, drew pictures of (!). I threw all of that stuff away. I find it hard to take people seriously who place so much credence in someone's high school antics (beyond rape or murder, of course - neither of which we're talking about).

Attempted rape is a pass though?

[Anonymous]

I know Kavanaugh acknowledged the beach week letter was his, but where did it come from? Who produced it? And who on earth saves something like this from HIGH SCHOOL??