
Well, then historically in context, this doesn’t work. You are still mad about it (from 16 years ago) and perhaps it is time to try something else for that school and for FCPS rather than disturbing the lives of kids. WSHS has empty classrooms, Lewis is dwindling in its population. Why reach for the same solutions you didn’t like? It sounds like you want to punish people for something you had to do. |
What other high school shares a large boundary with Lewis and is projected to have over 2900 kids in five years? |
It’s not about punishment but even-handedness and fairness. |
The FCPS Governance Committee is proposing changes to boundary adjustments policy 8130 - which will enable expedited adjustments and more leeway for Super and school board to implement boundary adjustments. The public meeting is May 28th. |
That projection is NOT accurate. It does not match any of the published enrollment numbers for any of the WSHS feeders, including Irving. WSHS should decrease enrollment slightly over the next two years, then by a couple hundred once the class of 2026 graduates. Something is very off with that 2900 estimate. |
You are making wildly false assumptions. I’m not complaining about past boundary changes, but noting they have ample precedent in FCPS. In some cases they have been successful and achieved their intended results. |
Then you should FOIA the projection methodology and challenge it. Simply claiming they are getting it wrong will get you nowhere. WS parents have a history of making statements about impending enrollment drops that have proven incorrect. |
You know the SB would bury PP in cost and paper. The SB and its staff think that they are above public scrutiny. Lewis parents have a history of lying all the time. |
Lolz so now everyone is out to get WS students? And please, point me to posts from the “lying all the time” Lewis parents. You’re just gonna keep throwing crap at the wall to see what sticks, eh? |
Which cases have been successful and what are the intended results? There is not an achievement gap that has been closed because of this. The only result is school average test scores go up because the school composition changes. This doesn’t mean the individual kids do better. It means nothing to the individual kids who were moved except they get moved away from the community they know. When do we start helping the KIDS and stop looking at data averages as measures of success? |
That’s a cop out. If you’re going to claim the FCPS projections are wrong and that it would be such an affront to move to Lewis, you should be more than willing to foot the bill to point out what FCPS staff is getting wrong. |
You can’t seriously contend Lewis kids have the same opportunities as West Springfield kids. This needs to change. |
There are plenty of ways to change this that doesn’t involve moving WSHS kids to Lewis. The school board hasn’t historically cared about Lewis the way some posters on this board would like to believe. If it did, Lewis wouldn’t have that stupid Academy and crappy AP selections. |
I haven’t seen a single alternative offered by WS parents that hasn’t involved either closing or eviscerating Lewis or delays that would continue to leave Lewis students with inferior opportunities compared to their peers just a few miles away. |
This is accurate. |